NEWDOW et al v. ROBERTS et al

Filing 16

REPLY to opposition to motion re 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by ROBERT SHERMAN, MARGARET DOWNEY, AUGUST BERKSHIRE, MARIE CASTLE, STUART BECHMAN, MICHAEL NEWDOW, HERB SILVERMAN, JASON TORPY, HARRY GREENBERGER, KIRK HORNBECK, JIM CORBETT, CATHERINE LAMM, RICHARD WINGROVE, CHRISTOPHER ARNTZEN, JOHN STOLTENBERG, KATHERINE LACLAIR, ELLERY SCHEMPP, LOUIS ALTMAN, PAUL CASE, JERRY SCHIFFELBEIN, ANNE PHILIP, JAY RICHARDSON, DAN DUGAN, ANNA MAE ANDREWS, ELIZA SUTTON, RICHARD RESSMAN, AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION, MEL LIPMAN, FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, MILITARY ASSOICAITON OF ATHEISTS & FREETHINKERS, MINESOTA ATHEISTS, ATHEISTS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, ATHEIST ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL, ATHEISTS UNITED, NEW ORLEANS SECULAR HUMANIST ASSN, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SECULAR STUDENT UNION, SEATTLE ATHEISTS, ATHEISTS OF FLORIDA, DAN BARKER, ANNIE-LAURIE GAYLOR. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix 2001 Objections to Magistrations Recommendations, # 2 Appendix 2005 Fed Def Memo in Opposition, # 3 Appendix Circuit Ct Dismissal)(Ritter, Robert)

Case: 05-5003

Document: 01219550

Page: 1

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No. 05-5003

September Term, 2004
04cv02208 Filed On: April 14, 2005 [889278]

Michael A. Newdow, Appellant v. George W. Bush, President of the United States, et al., Appellees

BEFORE:

Randolph, Rogers, and Roberts, Circuit Judges ORDER

Upon consideration of the motions to dismiss the appeal as moot and the response thereto, which includes a request for waiver of future appellate filing fees, it is ORDERED that the motions to dismiss be granted. See Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Shalala, 53 F.3d 363, 366 (D.C. Cir. 1995). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's motion for a waiver of future appellate filing fees be denied. Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to issue forthwith to the district court a certified copy of this order in lieu of formal mandate. Per Curiam