NEWDOW et al v. ROBERTS et al
Memorandum in opposition to re 17 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Declaratiion of Plaintff Michael Newdow filed by JOHN ROBERTS, JR, JOINT CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE ON INAUGURAL CEREMONIES, DIANNE FEINSTEIN, ARMED FORCES INAUGURAL COMMITTEE, RICHARD J. ROWE. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Rosenberg, Brad)
Rosenberg, Brad (CIV)
From: Sent: To: Subject: Bob: Thank you for your e-mail. As we just discussed on the phone, and in light of Local Rule 65.1, the federal defendants do not consent to the filing of any declarations as part of your client's reply brief. To that end, the federal defendants reserve their rights to oppose and/or move to strike any such declarations. -Brad -----Original Message----From: Bob Ritter [mailto:BobRitter@verizon.net] Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 3:51 PM To: Rosenberg, Brad (CIV); email@example.com; EDHogan@HHLAW.com Subject: Request consent to file declarations of approx. 10 plaintiffs in Newdow v. Roberts To: Brad Rosenbert, U.S. Dept. of Justice Des Hogan, Hogan & Hartson LLP Rev. Rick Warren, Saddleback Church Request consent to file declarations of approx. 10 plaintiffs in Newdow v. Roberts. The declarations will state, among other things, that the plaintiffs intend to watch the 2009 Presidential Inauguration either in person or on the TV. Bob Ritter Attorney Appignani Humanist Legal Center American Humanist Association 202-238-9088 | 1-800-837-3792 firstname.lastname@example.org Rosenberg, Brad (CIV) Saturday, January 10, 2009 3:58 PM Bob Ritter; email@example.com; EDHogan@HHLAW.com RE: Request consent to file declarations of approx. 10 plaintiffs in Newdow v. Roberts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?