IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION

Filing 1529

MOTION to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Hold in Abeyance by GEORGE W. BUSH, JR, DONALD RUMSFELD, GORDON R. ENGLAND, JOHN D. ALTENBURG, JR, JAY HOOD, BRICE A. GYURISKO (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Wolfe, Kristina)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) IN RE: ) GUANTANAMO BAY ) Misc. No. 08-442 (TFH) DETAINEE LITIGATION ) ___________________________________ ) ) ) AL QOSI, ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 04-1937 (PLF) ) GEORGE W. BUSH, ) President of the United States, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ) [PROPOSED] ORDER Upon Respondents' Motion to Dismiss Habeas Petition Without Prejudice or, Alternatively, to Hold Petition in Abeyance Pending Completion of Military Commission Proceedings, it is hereby, ORDERED that petitioner Ibrahim Ahmed Mahmoud Al Qosi's habeas petition is dismissed without prejudice. Date: ____________________ ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) IN RE: ) GUANTANAMO BAY ) Misc. No. 08-442 (TFH) DETAINEE LITIGATION ) ___________________________________ ) ) ) AL QOSI, ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 04-1937 (PLF) ) GEORGE W. BUSH, ) President of the United States, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ) [PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE] ORDER Upon Respondents' Motion to Dismiss Habeas Petition Without Prejudice or, Alternatively, to Hold Petition in Abeyance Pending Completion of Military Commission Proceedings, it is hereby, ORDERED that petitioner Ibrahim Ahmed Mahmoud Al Qosi's habeas petition is held in abeyance pending completion of military commission proceedings. Date: ____________________ ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?