IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION
Filing
1529
MOTION to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Hold in Abeyance by GEORGE W. BUSH, JR, DONALD RUMSFELD, GORDON R. ENGLAND, JOHN D. ALTENBURG, JR, JAY HOOD, BRICE A. GYURISKO (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Wolfe, Kristina)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) IN RE: ) GUANTANAMO BAY ) Misc. No. 08-442 (TFH) DETAINEE LITIGATION ) ___________________________________ ) ) ) AL QOSI, ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 04-1937 (PLF) ) GEORGE W. BUSH, ) President of the United States, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ) [PROPOSED] ORDER Upon Respondents' Motion to Dismiss Habeas Petition Without Prejudice or, Alternatively, to Hold Petition in Abeyance Pending Completion of Military Commission Proceedings, it is hereby, ORDERED that petitioner Ibrahim Ahmed Mahmoud Al Qosi's habeas petition is dismissed without prejudice.
Date: ____________________
________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) IN RE: ) GUANTANAMO BAY ) Misc. No. 08-442 (TFH) DETAINEE LITIGATION ) ___________________________________ ) ) ) AL QOSI, ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 04-1937 (PLF) ) GEORGE W. BUSH, ) President of the United States, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ) [PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE] ORDER Upon Respondents' Motion to Dismiss Habeas Petition Without Prejudice or, Alternatively, to Hold Petition in Abeyance Pending Completion of Military Commission Proceedings, it is hereby, ORDERED that petitioner Ibrahim Ahmed Mahmoud Al Qosi's habeas petition is held in abeyance pending completion of military commission proceedings.
Date: ____________________
________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?