IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION

Filing 1868

MOTION for Order to Show Cause Why The Government Should Not Be Held In Contempt filed by The Associated Press, The New York Times Company and USA Today by GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of David A. Schulz in Support of Motion, # 2 Exhibit A to Schulz Declaration, # 3 Exhibit B to Schulz Declaration, # 4 Exhibit C-Part 1 to Schulz Declaration, # 5 Exhibit C-Part 2 to Schulz Declaration, # 6 Exhibit D to Schulz Declaration, # 7 Exhibit E to Schulz Declaration, # 8 Text of Proposed Order)(Bead, Jeanette)

Download PDF
IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION Doc. 1868 Att. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION Misc. No. 08-442 (TFH) ORDER Pending before the Court is Press Intervenors' Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why the Government Should Not Be Held in Contempt. Upon consideration of the Motion for an Order to Show Cause, the Court ORDERS that the motion is GRANTED. Within ten (10) days of the date of this Order Respondents shall file a memorandum explaining why the Government should not be held in contempt for violating the Court's June 1 Order. The Court further ORDERS that: (1) Respondents shall fully comply with the Court's June 1 Order by no later than ten (10) days of the date of this Order; (2) Respondents shall file affirm that, in every instance where they have filed documents in these proceedings from which unclassified information is being withheld, a motion for permission to seal has been filed, as required by Paragraphs 34-35 of the September 11, 2008 Protective Order; and (3) Respondents shall pay Press Intervenors' reasonable costs and attorneys' fees in bringing their motion. SO ORDERED. October __, 2009 Thomas F. Hogan United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?