IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION

Filing 392

Memorandum in opposition to re 317 MOTION Partial and Temporary Relief from Court's July 11, 2008 Scheduling Order re (53 in 1:08-mc-00442-TFH) Scheduling Order, MOTION Partial and Temporary Relief from Court's July 11, 2008 Scheduling Order re (53 in 1:08-mc-00442-TFH) Scheduling Order, MOTION Partial and Temporary Relief from Court's July 11, 2008 Scheduling Order re (53 in 1:08-mc-00442-TFH) Scheduling Order, filed by GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Kauffman, Samuel)

Download PDF
IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION Doc. 392 CLEARED FOR PUBLIC FILING WITH CSO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE: Misc. No. 08-442 (TFH) GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION Civil Action No. 05-00247 (HHK) PETITIONERS' RESPONSE TO RESPONDENTS' MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM SCHEDULING ORDER Respondents request that they be excused from the requirement of the Court's July 11, 2008 Scheduling Order (Misc. No. 08-0442) (dkt. no. 53) that respondents produce 50 factual returns by August 29, 2008. Respondents further acknowledged at the time of filing, they intended to file 14 proposed amended factual returns. Petitioner's case is one of the 14 in which proposed amended returns and a corresponding motion for leave to file such return (document 93) was filed in compliance with the Court's scheduling order. Accordingly, the Court should deny respondents' motion for relief from scheduling order as moot. Respectfully submitted, GARVEY SCHUBERT BARER By s/ Robert C. Weaver Robert C. Weaver, Jr. OSB #80135 Samuel C. Kauffman, OSB #94352 GARVEY SCHUBERT BARER Eleventh Floor 121 SW Morrison St. Portland, OR 97204 Tel: (503) 228-3939 Fax: (503) 226-0259 rweaver@gsblaw.com skauffman@gsblaw.com jrothermich@gsblaw.com Attorneys for Petitioner Dated: September 8, 2008 PDX_DOCS:418287.1 [30185-00228] Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?