IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION

Filing 665

NOTICE OF PETITIONER'S AUTHORIZATION OF REPRESENTATION by HASSAN BIN ATTASH (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Remes Declaration)(LeBlanc, Travis)

Download PDF
IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION Doc. 665 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) Misc. No. 08-442(TFH) Civil Action No. 05-CV-01592(UNA) NOTICE OF PETITIONER'S AUTHORIZATION OF REPRESENTATION Pursuant to the Court's July 29, 2008 Order, Misc. No. 08-442 Doc. 210, counsel for Petitioner Hassan Bin Attash herewith file the Declaration of David H. Remes Concerning Authorization to Represent Petitioner Hassan Bin Attash (ISN 1456), which states that Petitioner directly authorized counsel to pursue this action and explains why counsel were unable to secure a signed authorization. See Ex. 1. Respectfully submitted, Dated: October 7, 2008 /s/ Travis LeBlanc TRAVIS LEBLANC (D.C. Bar No. 496844) ASHOK RAMANI (Pursuant to LCvR 83.2(g)) KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 /s/ David H. Remes DAVID H. REMES Appeal for Justice 1106 Noyes Drive Silver Spring, MD 20910 Telephone: (202) 669-6508 Attorneys for Petitioner HASSAN BIN ATTASH 427119.01 Dockets.Justia.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on October 7, 2008, I caused the foregoing Notice of Petitioner's Authorization of Representation and Declaration of David H. Remes Concerning Authorization to Represent Petitioner Hassan Bin Attash (ISN 1456) to be delivered to the below-listed counsel of record in the above-captioned matters through the CM/ECF system: Alexander Kenneth Haas Terry Marcus Henry James J. Schwartz Judry Laeb Subar Andrew I. Warden United States Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20530 _/s/ Travis LeBlanc____________ 427119.01

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?