IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION

Filing 771

Memorandum in opposition to re (35 in 1:08-cv-01185-UNA, 670 in 1:08-mc-00442-TFH, 118 in 1:05-cv-02479-UNA, 268 in 1:04-cv-01194-UNA, 74 in 1:05-cv-00994-UNA, 119 in 1:05-cv-01353-UNA, 78 in 1:05-cv-00748-UNA, 170 in 1:05-cv-00280-UNA, 77 in 1:05-cv-01347-UNA, 20 in 1:08-cv-01221-UNA, 104 in 1:05-cv-01504-UNA, 96 in 1:05-cv-01505-UNA, 79 in 1:05-cv-02349-UNA, 76 in 1:06-cv-00618-UNA, 67 in 1:05-cv-02385-UNA, 617 in 1:05-cv-02386-UNA, 86 in 1:05-cv-00999-UNA) MOTION for Status Hearing filed by GEORGE W. BUSH, JR, DONALD RUMSFELD, JAY HOOD, NELSON J. CANNON, GEORGE W. BUSH, JAY HOOD, NELSON J. CANNON, JAY HOOD, BRICE GYURISKO, BRICE GYURISKO, JAY HOOD, GEORGE W. BUSH, MIKE BUMGARNER, BRICE GYURISKO, MIKE BUMGARNER, DONALD RUMSFELD, JAY HOOD, MIKE BUMGARNER, MIKE BUMGARNER, JAY HOOD, MIKE BUMGARNER, MIKE BUMGARNER, JAY HOOD, MIKE BUMGARNER, MIKE BUMGARNER, WADE F. DENNIS, HARRY B. HARRIS, JAY HOOD, MIKE BUMGARNER, ROBERT M. GATES, MARK H. BUZBY, BRUCE VARGO, ROBERT M. GATES, DAVID M. THOMAS, JR, BRUCE VARGO. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Mason, Kathryn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _______________________________ ) IN RE: ) Misc. No. 08-0442 (TFH) ) GUANTANAMO BAY ) Civil Action Nos. DETAINEE LITIGATION ) ) 04-cv-1194; 05-cv-0280; 05-cv-0748; 05-cv-0994; ) 05-cv-0999; 05-cv-1347; 05-cv-1353; 05-cv-1504; ) 05-cv-1505; 05-cv-2349; 05-cv-2385; 05-cv-2386; _______________________________ ) 05-cv-2479; 06-cv-0618; 08-cv-1185; 08-cv-1221 ORDER Upon consideration of Petitioners' Motion for Status Hearing, and Respondents' response thereto, it is hereby ordered that Petitioners' motion is DENIED. SO ORDERED. ______________________________ Thomas F. Hogan United States District Judge Dated: __________

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?