IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION

Filing 874

NOTICE of Joinder by HASSAN BIN ATTASH re (872 in 1:08-mc-00442-TFH) Memorandum in Opposition, (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(LeBlanc, Travis)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) Misc. No. 08-442(TFH) Civil Action No. 05-CV-01592(UNA) NOTICE OF JOINDER Undersigned counsel notify the Court and counsel for Respondents that Petitioner Hassan Bin Attash in the above-captioned civil action joins in "Petitioners' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Respondents' `Motion to Dismiss Improper Respondents'" ("Response") filed in the miscellaneous docket on October 30, 2008. A notice and summary of the Response was filed as miscellaneous docket number 872. Undersigned counsel for Petitioner Attash also attach, as Exhibit A hereto, a true and correct copy of October 27, 2008 and October 29, 2008 email correspondence from Petitioner's counsel, Travis LeBlanc, to Respondents' counsel, Scott Marconda. Counsel for Respondents did not reply to either email. Respectfully submitted, Dated: October 30, 2008 /s/ Travis LeBlanc TRAVIS LEBLANC (D.C. Bar No. 496844) ASHOK RAMANI (Pursuant to LCvR 83.2(g)) KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 Attorneys for Petitioner HASSAN BIN ATTASH 430010.01 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on October 30, 2008, I caused the foregoing Notice of Joinder to be delivered to the below-listed counsel of record in the above-captioned matters through the CM/ECF system: Alexander Kenneth Haas Terry Marcus Henry James J. Schwartz Andrew I. Warden United States Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20530 _/s/ Travis LeBlanc____________ 430010.01

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?