UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AT&T INC. et al

Filing 55

NOTICE by AT&T INC., DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG, T-MOBILE USA, INC. re 53 Notice (Other) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Letter)(Hansen, Mark)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:11-cv-01560-ESH AT&T INC., et al., (Referred to Special Master Levie) Defendants. NOTICE OF FILING Defendants give notice of filing of a letter, attached hereto as Exhibit A, addressed to Judges Ellen S. Huvelle and Richard A. Levie concerning Google’s letter of October 12, 2011, regarding its motion to amend the Protective Order [ECF No. 34-2]. Dated: October 12, 2011 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Mark C. Hansen Mark C. Hansen, D.C. Bar # 425930 Michael K. Kellogg, D.C. Bar # 372049 Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C. 1615 M Street, NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 326-7900 Richard L. Rosen, D.C. Bar # 307231 Donna E. Patterson, D.C. Bar # 358701 Arnold & Porter LLP 555 Twelfth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004-1206 (202) 942-5000 Wm. Randolph Smith, D.C. Bar # 356402 Kathryn D. Kirmayer, D.C. Bar # 424699 Crowell & Moring, LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 (202) 624-2500 Counsel for AT&T Inc. George S. Cary, D.C. Bar # 285411 Mark W. Nelson, D.C. Bar # 442461 Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20006 (202) 974-1500 Richard G. Parker, D.C. Bar # 327544 O’Melveny & Myers LLP 1625 Eye Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 (202) 383-5300 Counsel for T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Deutsche Telekom AG CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on October 12, 2011, I caused the foregoing Notice of Filing to be filed using the Court’s CM/ECF system, which will send e-mail notification of such filings to counsel of record. This document is available for viewing and downloading on the CM/ECF system. /s/ Mark C. Hansen Mark C. Hansen

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?