UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AT&T INC. et al
Filing
67
MOTION to Quash Subpoena by SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Compliance with Rule 7(m), # 2 Certificate of Service, # 3 Declaration of Tara L. Reinhart with Exhibits, # 4 Text of Proposed Order)(Reinhart, Tara)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that, on October 28, 2011, I caused the foregoing Motion to Quash
Subpoena to be filed using the Court’s CM/ECF system. I also caused the foregoing document
to be mailed via electronic mail to:
The Honorable Richard A. Levie
JAMS
555 13th Street, NW, Suite 400 West
Washington, DC 20004
Tel. (202) 533-2056
ralevie@gmail.com; rlevie@jamsadr.com
*With two hard copies by hand-delivery
Matthew C. Hammond
202-305-8541
matthew.hammond@usdoj.gov
Katherine Celeste
U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division
450 Fifth Street, N.W., Suite 7000
Washington, DC 20001
202-532-4713
202-514-5381 (fax)
katherine.celeste@usdoj.gov
Counsel for the United States
Geralyn J. Trujillo
STATE OF NEW YORK
Office of the Attorney General
Antitrust Bureau
120 Broadway, 26th Floor
New York, NY 10271
Tel: 212-416-6677
Fax: 212-416-6015
Geralyn.Trujillo@ag.ny.gov
David M. Kerwin
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Office of Attorney General
Antitrust Division
800 Fifth Avenue, S. 2000
Seattle, WA 98104
Tel: 206-464-7030
Fax: 206-464-6338
davidk3@atg.wa.gov
Representative Counsel for the Plaintiff States
Michael K. Kellogg
Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C.
1615 M Street, N.W.
Suite 400
Washington, DC 20036
202-326-7902
mkellogg@khhte.com
Counsel for Defendant AT&T Inc.
Mark W. Nelson
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington DC 20006
202-974-1622
mnelson@cgsh.com
Counsel for Defendants T-Mobile USA, Inc., and Deutsche Telekom AG
/s/ Tara L. Reinhart
Tara L. Reinhart (D.C. Bar No. 462106)
Counsel for Sprint Nextel Corporation
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?