UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AT&T INC. et al

Filing 69

Memorandum in opposition to re 67 MOTION to Quash Subpoena filed by AT&T INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B (Declaration of Steven F. Benz), # 3 Exhibit 1, # 4 Exhibit 2, # 5 Exhibit 3, # 6 Exhibit 4, # 7 Exhibit 5, # 8 Exhibit 6, # 9 Notice Regarding Filing of Sealed Material, # 10 Text of Proposed Order)(Benz, Steven) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/3/2011: # 11 Exhibit 4 (FILED UNDER SEAL), # 12 Exhibit 5 (FILED UNDER SEAL) , # 13 Exhibit 6 (FILED UNDER SEAL)) (jf, ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 1:11-cv-01560 (ESH)

v.
AT&T INC., et al.,
Defendants.

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SPRINT’S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA
Upon review and consideration of Sprint Nextel Corp.’s Motion To Quash Subpoena and
AT&T Inc.’s opposition thereto, it is this ______ day of ______________ 2011 hereby
ORDERED that the motion is DENIED; and it is further
ORDERED that Sprint Nextel Corp. comply with the terms of AT&T Inc.’s Rule 45
Subpoena and immediately provide AT&T Inc. with any and all information responsive to the
Subpoena requests, as those requests have been modified as delineated in the Table attached as
Exhibit A to AT&T’s opposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Hon. Richard A. Levie (Ret.)
Special Master

Copies served upon:
Electronic Service List