KLAYMAN v. OBAMA et al

Filing 25

Memorandum in opposition to re 13 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by KEITH B. ALEXANDER, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration (Declaration of James J. Gilligan), # 2 Exhibit (Exhibit A), # 3 Exhibit (Exhibit B), # 4 Exhibit (Exhibit C), # 5 Exhibit (Exhibit D), # 6 Exhibit (Exhibit E), # 7 Exhibit (Exhibit F), # 8 Exhibit (Exhibit G), # 9 Exhibit (Exhibit H), # 10 Exhibit (Exhibit I), # 11 Exhibit (Exhibit J), # 12 Exhibit (Exhibit K), # 13 Exhibit (Exhibit L), # 14 Exhibit (Exhibit M), # 15 Exhibit (Exhibit N), # 16 Exhibit (Exhibit O), # 17 Exhibit (Exhibit P), # 18 Exhibit (Exhibit Q), # 19 Exhibit (Exhibit R), # 20 Exhibit (Exhibit S), # 21 Exhibit (Exhibit T), # 22 Text of Proposed Order)(Gilligan, James)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ) LARRY KLAYMAN, et al., ) ) Civil Action No. Plaintiffs, ) 1:13-cv-00851-RJL ) v. ) ) BARACK OBAMA, President of the ) United States, et al., ) ) Defendants. ____________________________________) ) ) LARRY KLAYMAN, et al., ) ) Civil Action No. Plaintiffs, ) 1:13-cv-00881-RJL ) v. ) ) BARACK OBAMA, President of the ) United States, et al., ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) [PROPOSED] ORDER The above-captioned cases are before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ motions for preliminary injunctions (Dkt. No. 13 in action no. 13-cv-851; Dkt. No. 10 in action no. 13-cv-881). Upon consideration of the Plaintiffs’ submissions in support of their motions, and of the Government Defendants in opposition to Plaintiffs’ motions, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Plaintiffs’ motions for preliminary injunctions are hereby DENIED. So ORDERED this __________ day of _______________, 2013. __________________________________ HON. RICHARD J. LEON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?