KLAYMAN v. OBAMA et al

Filing 52

MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative for Summary Judgment, Regarding Plaintiffs' Claims Against the Verizon Defendants by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Text of Proposed Order, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit)(Patton, Rodney). Added MOTION for Summary Judgment on 12/17/2013 (znmw, ).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) LARRY KLAYMAN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action No. ) 1:13-cv-00851-RJL v. ) ) BARACK OBAMA, President of the ) United States, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) [PROPOSED] ORDER Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding, Plaintiffs’ Claims Against the Verizon Defendants brought by Defendant United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”), pursuant to Section 802 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (“FISA”), 50 U.S.C. § 1885a. Based on Defendant DOJ’s motion, the public certification of the Deputy Attorney General of the United States, the classified supplement to the DOJ motion, and any response thereto, it is ordered, that the motion by DOJ shall be and hereby is granted. The Court finds that the Deputy Attorney General of the United States has properly certified, pursuant to FISA Section 802, that a cause or action may not lie or be maintained against defendants Verizon Communications and its Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Lowell C. McAdam. Accordingly, given that there is substantial evidence to support the Deputy Attorney General’s conclusion, Plaintiffs’ claims against both Verizon Communications and CEO McAdam shall be and hereby are dismissed. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Honorable Richard J. Leon U.S. District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?