KLAYMAN v. OBAMA et al

Filing 56

ENTERED IN ERROR.....MOTION for Extension of Time by KEITH B. ALEXANDER, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(rdj) Modified on 12/17/2013 (rdj).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) LARRY KLAYMAN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action No. ) 1:13-cv-00851-RJL v. ) ) BARACK OBAMA, President of the ) United States, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) ) LARRY KLAYMAN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action No. ) 1:13-cv-00881-RJL ) v. ) ) BARACK OBAMA, President of the ) United States, et al., ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) [PROPOSED] ORDER This case is before the Court on the motion of defendants Barack Obama, President of the United States, Eric Holder, Attorney General of the United States, and General Keith B. Alexander, Director of the National Security Agency (NSA), insofar as they are sued in their official capacities, together with defendants NSA and the United States Department of Justice (collectively, the “Government Defendants”), for an extension of time, until January 10, 2014, to respond to the amended complaints in these cases, in light of the Memorandum Opinion issued by the Court today. The Court having considered Government Defendants’ submission in support of their motion and any submissions in opposition thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Government Defendants’ motion is hereby GRANTED. 2. Government Defendants’ deadline to respond to the amended complaints is January 10, 2014. So ORDERED this __________ day of _______________, 2013. __________________________________ HON. RICHARD J. LEON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?