AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS et al v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.
Filing
104
NOTICE of Proposed Order to Set Schedule for Expert Discovery by NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, INC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Setting Schedule for Expert Discovery, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A to Notice of Filing, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B to Notice of Filing)(Rehn, Nathan)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING
AND MATERIALS d/b/a/ ASTM
INTERNATIONAL;
NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION
ASSOCIATION, INC.; and
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEATING,
REFRIGERATING, AND AIR
CONDITIONING ENGINEERS,
Case No. 1:13-cv-01215-TSC-DAR
Plaintiffs/
Counter-Defendants,
v.
PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.,
Defendant/
Counter-Plaintiff.
[PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR EXPERT DISCOVERY
Having fully considered the parties’ submissions, and for good cause shown, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Court sets the schedule for expert discovery as follows.
Previous Date
New Date
Opening Expert Disclosures on issues for which
disclosing party bears the burden of proof
March 2, 2015
June 5, 2015
Rebuttal expert disclosures or opening expert disclosures
on issues for which disclosing party does not bear the
burden of proof
April 13, 2015
July 2, 2015
Rebuttal expert disclosures or replies to rebuttal
disclosures on issues for which disclosing party bears the
burden of proof
June 1, 2015
July 17, 2015
1:13-cv-01215-TSC-DAR
PROPOSED ORDER
Reply expert disclosures on issues for which disclosing
party does not bear the burden of proof
June 15, 2015
July 31, 2015
Close of Expert Discovery
July 14, 2015
August 14, 2015
Joint Status Report
July 21, 2015
August 21, 2015
Status Conference
July 28, 2015
August 28, 2015
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
The Honorable Deborah A. Robinson
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
-2PROPOSED ORDER
1:13-cv-01215-TSC-DAR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?