AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS et al v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.
Filing
152
Consent MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Sebastian E. Kaplan, :Firm- Fenwick & West LLP, :Address- 555 California Street, 12th Fl., San Francisco, CA 94104. Phone No. - (415) 875-2300. Fax No. - (415) 281-1350 Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0090-4377635. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Sebastian Kaplan, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Stoltz, Mitchell)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND
MATERIALS, d/b/a ASTM INTERNATIONAL,
et al.,
Case No. 1:13-cv-01215-TSC-DAR
Plaintiffs,
v.
PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.,
Defendant.
MOTION TO ADMIT SEBASTIAN E. KAPLAN PRO HAC VICE
Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.2(d), MITCHELL L. STOLTZ, counsel for Defendant
Public.Resource.org in this matter, and a member in good standing of the bar of this Court,
respectfully moves this Court for an Order admitting Sebastian E. Kaplan as counsel pro hac
vice. Mr. Kaplan is a member in good standing of the Bar of California and an Associate at
Fenwick & West LLP, located at 555 California Street, 12th Floor, San Francisco, California
94104.
Accompanying this Motion is Mr. Kaplan’s declaration containing the information
required for pro hac vice motions pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.2(d). Counsel for Defendant
has conferred with counsel for the Plaintiffs concerning this motion as required by Local Civil
Rule 7(m). Plaintiffs consent to the pro hac vice motion. In accordance with Local Civil
Rule 7(c), a proposed order is filed herewith.
1
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: January 13, 2016
/s/ Mitchell L. Stoltz
Mitchell L. Stoltz (D.C. Bar No. 978149)
mitch@eff.org
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION
815 Eddy Street
San Francisco, CA 94109
Telephone: (415) 436-9333
Facsimile: (415) 436-9993
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?