AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS et al v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.

Filing 152

Consent MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Sebastian E. Kaplan, :Firm- Fenwick & West LLP, :Address- 555 California Street, 12th Fl., San Francisco, CA 94104. Phone No. - (415) 875-2300. Fax No. - (415) 281-1350 Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0090-4377635. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Sebastian Kaplan, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Stoltz, Mitchell)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS, d/b/a ASTM INTERNATIONAL, et al., Case No. 1:13-cv-01215-TSC-DAR Plaintiffs, v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC., Defendant. MOTION TO ADMIT SEBASTIAN E. KAPLAN PRO HAC VICE Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.2(d), MITCHELL L. STOLTZ, counsel for Defendant Public.Resource.org in this matter, and a member in good standing of the bar of this Court, respectfully moves this Court for an Order admitting Sebastian E. Kaplan as counsel pro hac vice. Mr. Kaplan is a member in good standing of the Bar of California and an Associate at Fenwick & West LLP, located at 555 California Street, 12th Floor, San Francisco, California 94104. Accompanying this Motion is Mr. Kaplan’s declaration containing the information required for pro hac vice motions pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.2(d). Counsel for Defendant has conferred with counsel for the Plaintiffs concerning this motion as required by Local Civil Rule 7(m). Plaintiffs consent to the pro hac vice motion. In accordance with Local Civil Rule 7(c), a proposed order is filed herewith. 1 Respectfully submitted, Dated: January 13, 2016 /s/ Mitchell L. Stoltz Mitchell L. Stoltz (D.C. Bar No. 978149) mitch@eff.org ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 815 Eddy Street San Francisco, CA 94109 Telephone: (415) 436-9333 Facsimile: (415) 436-9993 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?