AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS et al v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.
Filing
18
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Corynne McSherry, :Firm- Electronic Frontier Foundation, :Address- 815 Eddy Street, San Francisco, CA 94109. Phone No. - 415-436-9333. Fax No. - 415-436-9993 by PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Corynne McSherry, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Stoltz, Mitchell)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR
TESTING AND MATERIALS, d/b/a
ASTM INTERNATIONAL, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
PUBLICRESOURCE.ORG, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No.: 1:13-cv-01215-EGS
MOTION TO ADMIT CORYNNE MCSHERRY PRO HAC VICE
Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.2(d), MITCHELL L. STOLTZ, counsel for Defendant
PublicResource.org in this matter, and a member in good standing of the bar of this Court,
respectfully moves this Court for an Order admitting Corynne McSherry as counsel pro hac vice.
Ms. McSherry is a member in good standing of the Bar of California and is the Director of
Intellectual Property at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, located at 815 Eddy Street, San
Francisco, California 94109.
Accompanying this Motion is Ms. McSherry’s declaration containing the information
required for pro hac vice motions pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.2(d). Counsel for Defendant
has conferred with counsel for the Plaintiffs concerning this motion as required by Local Civil
Rule 7(m). Plaintiffs consent to the pro hac vice motion. In accordance with Local Civil
Rule 7(c), a proposed order is filed herewith.
Dated: September 13, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Mitchell L. Stoltz
Mitchell L. Stoltz
mitch@eff.org
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION
815 Eddy Street
1
San Francisco, CA 94109
Telephone: (415) 436-9333
Facsimile: (415) 436-9993
Attorneys for Defendant
PublicResource.org
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?