AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS et al v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.

Filing 18

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Corynne McSherry, :Firm- Electronic Frontier Foundation, :Address- 815 Eddy Street, San Francisco, CA 94109. Phone No. - 415-436-9333. Fax No. - 415-436-9993 by PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Corynne McSherry, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Stoltz, Mitchell)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS, d/b/a ASTM INTERNATIONAL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PUBLICRESOURCE.ORG, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.: 1:13-cv-01215-EGS MOTION TO ADMIT CORYNNE MCSHERRY PRO HAC VICE Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.2(d), MITCHELL L. STOLTZ, counsel for Defendant PublicResource.org in this matter, and a member in good standing of the bar of this Court, respectfully moves this Court for an Order admitting Corynne McSherry as counsel pro hac vice. Ms. McSherry is a member in good standing of the Bar of California and is the Director of Intellectual Property at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, located at 815 Eddy Street, San Francisco, California 94109. Accompanying this Motion is Ms. McSherry’s declaration containing the information required for pro hac vice motions pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.2(d). Counsel for Defendant has conferred with counsel for the Plaintiffs concerning this motion as required by Local Civil Rule 7(m). Plaintiffs consent to the pro hac vice motion. In accordance with Local Civil Rule 7(c), a proposed order is filed herewith. Dated: September 13, 2013 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Mitchell L. Stoltz Mitchell L. Stoltz mitch@eff.org ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 815 Eddy Street 1 San Francisco, CA 94109 Telephone: (415) 436-9333 Facsimile: (415) 436-9993 Attorneys for Defendant PublicResource.org 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?