AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS et al v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Nahtan M. Rehn, :Firm- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, :Address- 560 Mission Street, 27th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. Phone No. - (415) 512-4000. Fax No. - (415) 512-4077 Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0090-3835256. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, INC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Nathan Rehn ISO, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Choudhury, Anjan)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS
d/b/a ASTM INTERNATIONAL; NATIONAL FIRE
PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, INC.; and AMERICAN
SOCIETY OF HEATING, REFRIGERATING, AND AIR
Case No.: 1:13-cv-01215- TSC
MOTION TO ADMIT ATTORNEY NATHAN M. REHN PRO HAC VICE
Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.2(d), ANJAN CHOUDHURY, counsel for Plaintiff
National Fire Protection Association, Inc. (“NFPA”) in this matter, and a member in good
standing of the bar of this Court, respectfully moves this Court for an Order admitting Nathan
M. Rehn as counsel pro hac vice. Mr. Rehn is a member in good standing of the Bar of
California and is an associate in the law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, located at 560
Mission Street, 27th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105-2907.
Accompanying this Motion is Mr. Rehn’s declaration containing the information required
for pro hac vice motions pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.2(d). Counsel for the NFPA has
conferred with counsel for the Defendant concerning this motion as required by Local Civil
Rule 7(m). Defendant consents to the pro hac vice motion. In accordance with Local Civil
Rule 7(c), a proposed order is filed herewith.
Dated: September 10, 2014
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
/s/ Anjan Choudhury
Anjan Choudhury (Bar No. 497271)
355 South Grand Ave.
Los Angeles, CA 94105
Attorneys for Plaintiff National Fire
Protection Association, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?