AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS et al v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.

Filing 71

MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery Defendant-Counterclaimant Public.Resource.Org, Inc.'s Motion for Extension of Discovery Period, Corresponding Modification of Scheduling Order, and Leave to Take More Than 10 Depositions by PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Kathleen Lu in Support of Defendant-Counterclaimant Public.Resource.Org, Inc.'s Motion for Extension of Discovery Period, Corresponding Modification of Scheduling Order, and Leave to Take More Than 10 Depositions, #2 Text of Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Extension of Discovery Period, Corresponding Modification of Scheduling Order, and Leave to Take More Than 10 Depositions)(Bridges, Andrew)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS d/b/a/ ASTM INTERNATIONAL; Case No. 1:13-cv-01215-TSC/DAR NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, INC.; and DECLARATION OF KATHLEEN LU IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTCOUNTERCLAIMANT PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY PERIOD, CORRESPONDING MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER, AND LEAVE TO TAKE MORE THAN 10 DEPOSITIONS AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEATING, REFRIGERATING, AND AIR-CONDITIONING ENGINEERS, INC. Plaintiffs, v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC., Complaint Filed: August 6, 2013 Defendant. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC., Counterclaimant, v. AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS d/b/a/ ASTM INTERNATIONAL; NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, INC.; and AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEATING, REFRIGERATING, AND AIR-CONDITIONING ENGINEERS, INC. Counterdefendants. I, KATHLEEN LU, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney admitted to practice in the State of California and am an associate with the law firm of Fenwick & West LLP, counsel of record for Defendant/CounterPlaintiff Public.Resource.Org, Inc. (“Public Resource”). 2. Counsel for Public Resource have conferred with counsel for Plaintiffs on numerous occasions throughout the month of January regarding an extension of the schedule to allow Public Resource time to review Plaintiffs’ many and sizable productions in late December and throughout January before Public Resource takes the depositions it had already noticed and completes its noticing of depositions. 3. Public Resource received nearly 42000 documents from ASTM on January 2, 2015. NFPA has stated that it has sent up to 50 banker’s boxes of paper documents and 11 rolls of microfilm containing 4000-7000 images each to vendors for scanning. Public Resource has not received the scans yet. Based on the rate of review of the productions thus far, counsel for Public Resource estimates that review of the documents that have come in since Christmas will take approximately 400 hours assuming a fairly fast rate. We will not be able to estimate whether we can review the NFPA productions at a similar rate until we receive the productions from the vendors, but if so, we estimate that review will also take several hundred hours. This chart shows, to the best of my knowledge, Plaintiffs’ past and upcoming productions: No. of Docs Party Beg Bates End Bates 08/11/14 08/12/14 19 ASHRAE ASHRAE0000001 ASHRAE0001618 08/27/14 08/28/14 2076 ASHRAE ASHRAE0001619 ASHRAE0022482 10/17/14 10/20/14 33 ASHRAE ASHRAE0022483 ASHRAE0022663 10/30/14 10/31/14 144 ASHRAE ASHRAE0022664 ASHRAE0024176 11/21/14 11/24/14 349 ASHRAE ASHRAE0024177 ASHRAE0027441 Date Sent Date of Receipt 1 12/23/14 12/29/14 196 ASHRAE ASHRAE0027442 ASHRAE0029541 01/09/15 01/09/15 153 ASHRAE ASHRAE0029542 ASHRAE0029846 07/29/14 07/30/14 310 ASTM ASTM000001 ASTM001830 10/17/14 10/20/14 266 ASTM ASTM001831 ASTM007110 12/31/14 01/02/14 41839 ASTM ASTM007111 ASTM096675 01/16/15 01/20/16 763 ASTM ASTM096676 ASTM102865 Anticipated unknown 01/30/15 unknown ASTM n/a n/a 05/22/14 05/23/14 52 NFPA NFPA‐PR0000001 NFPA‐PR0013031 06/20/14 06/23/14 24 NFPA NFPA‐PR0013032 NFPA‐PR0020392 11/24/14 11/25/14 40 NFPA NFPA‐PR0020393 NFPA‐PR0020701 12/30/14 12/31/14 1953 NFPA NFPA‐PR0020702 NFPA‐PR0028685 01/05/15 01/06/15 586 NFPA NFPA‐PR0028686 NFPA‐PR0038493 44,000‐ 77,000 pages NFPA n/a n/a unknown NFPA n/a n/a Up to 50 banker’s boxes NFPA n/a n/a 1/26/15 unknown Anticipated unknown 01/30/15 Unknown 4. unknown From my review of our production log, Public Resource produced 8,560 documents on August 28, 2014; 823 documents on October 31, 2014; 522 documents on November 14, 2014; and 1,968 documents on December 23, 2014. 5. Counsel for Public Resource has communicated with Plaintiffs by telephone and by email about an extension throughout January, including on January 5, January 7, January 8, January 11, January 20, January 21, January 22, January 23, January 27, and January 28. On 2 Friday, January 23, 2015, Mr. Childs, counsel for ASTM proposed on behalf of all plaintiffs that the parties have until January 30 to notice depositions that they would take “within a reasonable amount of time outside the current discovery period.” 6. On January 28, 2015, counsel for Public Resource had a call with counsel for all three plaintiffs. On that call, counsel for all three plaintiffs reiterated their position that the cutoff for taking depositions should be February 28, and that the cutoff for noticing depositions should be January 30. 7. Also on January 28, 2015, plaintiff NFPA served its amended Rule 26 disclosures, which added one witnesses. On December 24, plaintiff ASTM disclosed three additional witness, and on January 14, it disclosed one additional witness. Today, January 29, 2015, ASHRAE stated that it may disclose one additional witness. In total, Plaintiffs have disclosed 16 witnesses (other than Mr. Malamud). 8. Based on my review of some of the documents Plaintiffs have produced, it appears that Plaintiffs knew of and actively discussed Public Resource’s activities in March 2012. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 29th day of January, 2015. /s/ Kathleen Lu Kathleen Lu 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?