AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS et al v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.

Filing 91

Memorandum in opposition to re #86 Emergency MOTION for Order and Request for Expedited Briefing Schedule filed by PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.. (Attachments: #1 [Public] Declaration of Andrew P. Bridges In Support of Public.Resource.Org, Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion for Protective Order and Request for Expedited Briefing Schedule, #2 Exhibit 1 to Bridges Declaration, #3 Exhibit 2 to Bridges Declaration, #4 Exhibit 3 to Bridges Declaration, #5 Exhibit 4 to Bridges Declaration, #6 Exhibit 5 to Bridges Declaration, #7 Exhibit 6 to Bridges Declaration, #8 Exhibit 7 to Bridges Declaration, #9 Exhibit 8 to Bridges Declaration, #10 Exhibit 9 to Bridges Declaration, #11 Exhibit 10 to Bridges Declaration, #12 Exhibit 11 to Bridges Declaration, #13 Exhibit 12 to Bridges Declaration, #14 Exhibit 13 to Bridges Declaration, #15 Exhibit 14 to Bridges Declaration, #16 Exhibit 15 to Bridges Declaration, #17 Exhibit 16 to Bridges Declaration, #18 Text of Proposed Order Denying Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion for Protective Order and Request for Expedited Briefing Schedule)(Bridges, Andrew)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND
MATERIALS d/b/a ASTM INTERNATIONAL;

   Case No. 1:13-cv-01215-TSC-DAR

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
PLAINTIFFS’ EMERGENCY MOTION
FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND
REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED
BRIEFING SCHEDULE (DKT. NO. 86)

NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION
ASSOCIATION, INC.; and
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEATING,
REFRIGERATING, AND AIR CONDITIONING
ENGINEERS,
Plaintiffs/Counter-defendants,

Filed:

August 6, 2013

v.
PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.,
Defendant/Counterclaimant.

Having fully considered Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion for Protective Order and Request
for Expedited Briefing Schedule (Dkt. No. 86) and Defendant-Counterclaimant
Public.Resource.Org’s Opposition (Dkt. No. 90), and for good cause shown, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Motion for Protective Order is DENIED.
Public Resource is entitled to take discovery regarding Plaintiffs’ ownership of the
copyrights at issue.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________________

_________________________________
Hon. Deborah A. Robinson
United States Magistrate Judge