AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.

Filing 13

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendant's Counterclaim by AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC., AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC., NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, INC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hudis, Jonathan)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC., AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC., and NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, INC., Plaintiffs, v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-00857-CRC CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIM FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF Plaintiffs, American Educational Research Association, Inc. (“AERA”), American Psychological Association, Inc. (“APA”), and National Council on Education Measurement in Education, Inc. (“NCME”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), respectfully move this Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and LCvR 7 for an extension of time until August 25, 2014 to answer or otherwise respond to Defendant’s Counterclaim for Declaratory Relief. Prior to the filing of this motion, pursuant to LCvR 7(m), on July 22, 2014, Plaintiffs’ undersigned counsel conferred with Defendant’s counsel, Mitch Stoltz, via telephone and e-mail in a good faith effort to determine whether there would be any opposition to the relief sought by Plaintiffs. Defendant consents to the relief requested herein. Statement of Points and Authorities Defendant electronically filed its counterclaim in this case on July 14, 2014. Counsel for all parties conferred via telephone on July 22, 2014, at which time undersigned counsel for Plaintiffs requested Defendant’s consent to a 21-day extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to the counterclaim, moving the response date to August 25, 2014. Mitch Stoltz,   counsel for Defendant, consented to this relief by e-mail later in the day on July 22, 2014. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1) provides that the court may extend a filing deadline for good cause. Good cause exists here because: (i) all parties consent to the requested extension, (ii) no party will be prejudiced by the requested extension, and (iii) no other deadlines have yet been set in this case that would be affected by the requested extension. ACCORDINGLY, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court grant Plaintiffs an extension until August 25, 2014 to answer or otherwise respond to Defendant’s counterclaim. Respectfully submitted, OBLON, SPIVAK, McCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT,LLP Dated: July 23, 2014 By: /s/ Jonathan Hudis Jonathan Hudis (DC Bar # 418872) Kathleen Cooney-Porter (DC Bar # 434526) OBLON, SPIVAK, McCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, LLP 1940 Duke Street Alexandria, VA 22314 Tel. (703) 413-3000 Fax (703) 413-2220 E-Mail jhudis@oblon.com E-Mail kcooney-porter@oblon.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC. NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, INC.   ‐2  CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on July 23, 2014, the foregoing CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIM FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF and [PROPOSED] ORDER were filed using the CM/ECF system that sent notice of the filing of these documents to all counsel of record, and was also served via e-mail to: Andrew P. Bridges FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 112th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 abridges@fenwick.com David Halperin 1530 P Street NW Washington, DC 20005 davidhalperindc@gmail.com Mitchell L. Stoltz ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 815 Eddy Street San Francisco, CA 94109 mitch@eff.org Counsel for Defendant PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC., /s/ Jonathan Hudis Jonathan Hudis     3 

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?