AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.
Filing
31
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Matthew B. Becker, :Firm- Fenwick & West LLP, :Address- 801 California Street, Mountain View, CA 94041. Phone No. - (650) 335-7930. Fax No. - (650) 938-5200 Motion to Admit Matthew B. Becker Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0090-3960268. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridges, Andrew)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESARCH
ASSOCIATION, INC., AMERICAN
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCAITION, INC., and
NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN
EDUCATION, INC.,
Case No. 1:14-cv-00857-TSC-DAR
Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants,
v.
PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.,
Defendant/Counterclaimant.
MOTION TO ADMIT MATTHEW B. BECKER PRO HAC VICE
Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.2(d), ANDREW P. BRIDGES, counsel for Defendant
Public.Resource.Org in this matter, and a member in good standing of the bar of this Court,
respectfully moves this Court for an Order admitting Matthew B. Becker as counsel pro hac vice.
Mr. Becker is a member in good standing of the Bar of California and an Associate at Fenwick &
West LLP, located at 801 California Street, Mountain View, California 94041.
Accompanying this Motion is Mr. Becker’s declaration containing the information
required for pro hac vice motions pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.2(d). Counsel for Defendant
has conferred with counsel for the Plaintiffs concerning this motion as required by Local Civil
Rule 7(m). Plaintiffs consent to the pro hac vice motion. In accordance with Local Civil
Rule 7(c), a proposed order is filed herewith.
Dated: January 12, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Andrew P. Bridges
Andrew P. Bridges (D.C. Bar No. AR0002)
abridges@fenwick.com
FENWICK & WEST LLP
555 California Street, 12th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 875-2300
Facsimile: (415) 281-1350
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?