AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.

Filing 39

Memorandum in opposition to re #33 MOTION to Consolidate Cases Defendant-Counterclaim Public.Resource.Org, Inc.'s Motion to Consolidate for the Purposes of Discovery filed by AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEATING, REFRIGERATING, AND AIR-CONDITIONING ENGINEERS, INC., NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Fee, J.)

Download PDF
Fee, J. Kevin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Exhibit C Andrew Bridges [abridges@fenwick.com] Monday, February 09, 2015 1:07 PM Fee, J. Kevin; Childs, Edwin O.; Rubel, Jordana S.; 'Kelly.Klaus@mto.com'; 'Jonathan.Blavin@mto.com'; 'Thane.Rehn@mto.com'; 'KSteinthal@KSLAW.com'; 'BCunningham@KSLAW.com' 'corynne@eff.org'; 'mitch@eff.org'; Matthew Becker; Kathleen Lu Re: Public Resource / ASTM -scheduling of Malamud deposition Dear Kevin,    Thanks for your message. Mr. Malamud is prepared to go forward on those dates so long as the ASTM plaintiffs and the AERA  plaintiffs join in the depositions. As you know, as the Court invited us to file a motion for consolidation, and the motion is  pending. Please confer with AERA counsel and let me know if everyone agrees. Otherwise we may need to await a ruling on the  motion before proceeding.     Andrew   Andrew P. Bridges   Fenwick & West LLP ‐ San Francisco   abridges@fenwick.com   www.fenwick.com/andrewbridges   Direct +1 415 875 2389   Mobile +1 415 420 1482   Sent from my wireless PDA From: Fee, J. Kevin [mailto:jkfee@morganlewis.com] Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 11:57 AM Pacific Standard Time To: Andrew Bridges; Childs, Edwin O. <echilds@morganlewis.com>; Rubel, Jordana S. <jrubel@morganlewis.com>; 'Klaus, Kelly' <Kelly.Klaus@mto.com>; 'Blavin, Jonathan' <Jonathan.Blavin@mto.com>; 'Rehn, Thane' <Thane.Rehn@mto.com>; 'Steinthal, Kenneth' <KSteinthal@KSLAW.com>; 'Cunningham, Blake' <BCunningham@KSLAW.com> Cc: Corynne McSherry <corynne@eff.org>; 'Mitch Stoltz' <mitch@eff.org>; Matthew Becker; Kathleen Lu Subject: RE: Public Resource / ASTM -scheduling of Malamud deposition Andrew:     Based on your email below, we re‐noticed Mr. Malamud’s and Public.Resource.Org’s depositions for February 12th  and 13th.  For your convenience, copies of the previously‐issued deposition notices are attached.  Please confirm that  your clients intend to appear for the depositions as noticed.  Thank you.        J. Kevin Fee  Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW | Washington, DC 20004-2541 Direct: +1.202.739.5353 | Main: +1.202.739.3000 | Fax: +1.202.739.3001 jkfee@morganlewis.com | www.morganlewis.com Assistant: Miriam Barrow | +1.202.739.5725 | mbarrow@morganlewis.com   From: Andrew Bridges [mailto:abridges@fenwick.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 3:55 PM To: Fee, J. Kevin; Childs, Edwin O.; Rubel, Jordana S.; 'Klaus, Kelly'; 'Blavin, Jonathan'; 'Rehn, Thane'; 'Steinthal, Kenneth'; 'Cunningham, Blake' 1 Cc: Corynne McSherry; 'Mitch Stoltz'; Matthew Becker; Kathleen Lu Subject: Public Resource / ASTM -scheduling of Malamud deposition   Dear Kevin,    January 29 and 30, the dates you requested for Mr. Malamud and Public Resource’s depositions, don’t work at this end as we  had indicated weeks ago.  We are happy to work with you on mutually agreeable dates during the extended discovery period,  and February 12/13 look like potentially good dates.  Can we set up a call tomorrow with all counsel in the ASTM case to revisit  scheduling again before we file our motion for extension, to see if we can reach an agreement on the extension with an  appropriate framework for all the depositions?    In scheduling these depositions, please note that, at the most recent hearing in the AERA v PRO case, Judge Robinson stated that  she believed that case and the ASTM v PRO case should be consolidated for discovery purposes and requested briefing on that  subject.  We therefore plan to file a motion for consolidation for discovery purposes on Thursday.  In light of this development,  we believe that the parties should also confer with counsel for AERA in scheduling P.R.O.’s and Mr. Malamud’s depositions.    What times would plaintiffs’ counsel be available for a teleconference tomorrow?    Andrew P. Bridges  Fenwick & West LLP – San Francisco  T +1 415 875 2389  M +1 415 420 1482  @andrewbridges   abridges@fenwick.com  www.fenwick.com/andrewbridges     ------------------------------------------NOTICE: This email and all attachments are confidential, may be legally privileged, and are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom the email is addressed. However, mistakes sometimes happen in addressing emails. If you believe that you are not an intended recipient, please stop reading immediately. Do not copy, forward, or rely on the contents in any way. Notify the sender and/or Fenwick & West LLP by telephone at (650) 988-8500 and then delete or destroy any copy of this email and its attachments. Sender reserves and asserts all rights to confidentiality, including all privileges that may apply. DISCLAIMER This e-mail message is intended only for the personal use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and as such privileged and confidential and/or it may include attorney work product. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the original message. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?