AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.

Filing 40

Memorandum in opposition to re #33 MOTION to Consolidate Cases Defendant-Counterclaim Public.Resource.Org, Inc.'s Motion to Consolidate for the Purposes of Discovery filed by AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC., AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC., NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jonathan Hudis, #2 Exhibit A to Hudis Declaration, #3 Exhibit B to Hudis Declaration, #4 Exhibit C to Hudis Declaration, #5 Exhibit D to Hudis Declaration, #6 Exhibit E to Hudis Declaration, #7 Text of Proposed Order)(Hudis, Jonathan)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT E 1:14-cv-00857-TSC-DAR IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC., AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC., and NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, INC., Plaintiffs, v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-00857-CRC PLAINTIFFS’ INITIAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1) Plaintiffs, American Educational Research Association, Inc. (“AERA”), American Psychological Association, Inc. (“APA”), and National Council on Measurement in Education, Inc. (“NCME”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), by and through their attorneys, hereby submit the following initial disclosures to Defendant, Public.Resource.Org, Inc. (“Public Resource”), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1). Plaintiffs submit these Initial Disclosures based upon information they have acquired to date. Plaintiffs reserve their right, consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e), to modify, amend, and/or supplement these disclosures as additional evidence and information becomes available. I. Identities of Individuals Likely To Have Knowledge Of Discoverable Information Who May Be Used To Support The Disclosing Party’s Claims Or Defenses1 Plaintiffs submit the following names of individuals likely to have discoverable information that Plaintiffs may use to support their claims and/or defenses, and the subjects of the information believed to be known by these individuals: 1 For purposes of this proceeding, all individuals identified in these Disclosures are being represented by counsel for Plaintiffs and may be contacted only through Plaintiffs’ counsel. 1. Person: Felice Levine, Ph.D., Executive Director Company: AERA Address: 1430 K Street, NW, Suite 1200, Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 238-3200 Dr. Levine is expected to testify regarding the publication, marketing, sales, and Plaintiffs’ copyright ownership in the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (1999 ed.) (the “1999 Standards”). 2. Person: Marianne Ernesto, Director for Testing and Assessment Company: APA Address: 750 First Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20002 Telephone: (202) 336-6000 Ms. Ernesto is expected to testify regarding the availability of the 1999 Standards and the use of those Standards by practicing psychologists relating to matters of testing and assessments. 3. Person: Lauress L. Wise, Ph.D., President Company: NCME Address: 20 Ragsdale Drive, Suite 260, Monterey, CA 93940 Telephone: (831) 647-1004 Dr. Wise is expected to testify regarding the availability of the 1999 Standards and the use of those Standards by individuals involved in aspects of educational measurement relating to matters of testing and assessments. 4. Person: Diane L. Schneider, Ph.D., Senior Human Capital Consultant Company: pdri Address: 3000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 250, Arlington, VA 22201 Telephone: (703) 276-4680 Dr. Schneider is expected to testify regarding the process of creating the 1999 Standards, including the selection of the members of the Joint Committee and the role of the Joint Committee in preparing the 1999 Standards. 5. Person: Wayne J. Camara, Ph.D., Senior Vice President, Research Company: ACT, Inc. Address: 101 ACT Drive, Iowa City, IA 52243 Telephone: (319) 337-1869 Dr. Camara is expected to testify regarding the development of the 1999 Standards, the availability of the 1999 Standards and the use of those Standards by practicing psychologists relating to matters of testing and assessments. -2- 6. Person: Carl Malamud, President and Founder Company: Public.Resource.Org, Inc. Address: 1005 Gravenstein Highway. North, Sebastapol, CA 95472 Telephone:(707) 827-7290 Mr. Malamud is expected to testify regarding Public Resource’s knowledge that the 1999 Standards were and are subject to copyright protection. Mr. Malamud also is expected to testify regarding Public Resource’s knowledge that the 1999 Standards were replicated in digital format for the purpose of publishing them online. Mr. Malamud further is expected to testify regarding Public Resource’s publishing of the 1999 Standards online at https://law.resource.org/pub/us/cfr/ibr/001/aera.standards.1999.pdf, as well as Public Resource’s knowledge that The Internet Archive had published the 1999 Standards online at https://archive.org/details/gov.law.aera.standards.1999. 7. Person: Corporate Representative from The Internet Archive Company: The Internet Archive (Archive.Org) Address: 300 Funston Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94118 Telephone: (415) 561-6767 The Corporate Representative from The Internet Archive is expected to testify regarding The Internet Archive’s knowledge that the 1999 Standards were and are subject to copyright protection. The Corporate Representative is also expected to testify regarding The Internet Archive’s knowledge that the 1999 Standards were available at a website under Public Resource’s control and that The Internet Archive obtained the 1999 Standards from Public Resource’s website and published them at https://archive.org/details/gov.law.aera.standards.1999. II. Documents And Things In The Possession Of Counsel Or The Party That May Be Used To Support The Disclosing Party’s Claims Or Defenses Plaintiffs identify the following categories of documents and tangible things in its possession, custody, or control that Plaintiffs may use to support their claims and/or defenses: 1. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (1999 ed.); 2. 1999 Copyright Certificate of Registration for Registration Number TX 5-100-196; 3. 2014 Corrected Copyright Certificate of Registration for Registration Number TX 6-484-609; 4. Select documents pertaining to the preparation of the 1999 Standards; 5. Select documents pertaining to the advertisement of the 1999 Standards; 6. Select documents pertaining to the revenue generated from sales of the 1999 Standards; -3- 7. Portions of Public Resource’s website https://law.resource.org/pub/us/cfr/ibr/001/aera.standards.1999.pdf, when a full copy of the 1999 Standards was available online. 8. Portions of https://archive.org/details/gov.law.aera.standards.1999, when a full copy of the 1999 Standards was available online. 9. Select documents establishing Plaintiffs’ ownership of the Standards. These categories of documents are located at the offices of Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P., counsel for Plaintiffs, and/or at the facilities of Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also believe that documents in the possession, custody, or control of Public Resource, and/or third parties, such as The Internet Archive, may be relevant to the facts and issues in this case. The identification of the documents above is without any waiver of any right to object to the production of any document or item pursuant to privilege, work product, or any other rule or law that limits the discoverability of documents and physical materials. Plaintiffs will either (1) subject to a reciprocal agreement with Public Resource, provide Public Resource with copies of the above-identified documents, or (2) make the above-identified documents available for inspection and/or copying at a time and place that is mutually agreeable between Plaintiffs and Public Resource. Plaintiffs reserve the right to identify and/or produce additional materials in the future. Plaintiffs expressly reserve the right to identify and to rely upon additional materials if, during the course of discovery and investigation relating to this case, Plaintiffs learn that such additional materials are relevant to Plaintiffs’ claims. III. Statement of Basis for Any Damages Claimed Plaintiffs have not made a claim for damages in this action; however, Plaintiffs reserve the right to seek recovery of attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in connection with this action. -4- IV. Insurance Agreements Plaintiffs are unaware of any insurance agreement under which any person carrying on an insurance business may be liable to satisfy part or all of any judgment which may be entered in this action against Plaintiffs or to indemnify or reimburse Plaintiffs for payments made to satisfy said judgment. Plaintiffs reserve the right to supplement this response if additional information becomes available. Respectfully submitted, OBLON, SPIVAK, McCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT,LLP /s/ Jonathan Hudis Jonathan Hudis (DC Bar # 418872) Kathleen Cooney-Porter (DC Bar # 434526) 1940 Duke Street Alexandria, VA 22314 Tel. (703) 413-3000 Fax (703) 413-2220 E-Mail jhudis@oblon.com E-Mail kcooney-porter@oblon.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC. NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, INC. Dated: October 1, 2014 {431384US, 11006079_1.DOCX} -5- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that, on October 1, 2014 a copy of the foregoing PLAINTIFFS’ INITIAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1) was served via e-mail on the following counsel for Defendant: Andrew P. Bridges FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 112th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 abridges@fenwick.com David Halperin 1530 P Street NW Washington, DC 20005 davidhalperindc@gmail.com Mitchell L. Stoltz ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 815 Eddy Street San Francisco, CA 94109 mitch@eff.org Counsel for Defendant PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC. /s/ Jonathan Hudis Jonathan Hudis

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?