AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint by PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Stoltz, Mitchell)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC.,
ASSOCIATION, INC. and NATIONAL
COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN
Civil Action No.: 1:14-cv-00857-CRC
CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO
Defendant Public.Resource.Org, Inc., (“Public Resource”) moves the Court pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Civil Rule 7 for an extension of time until July
14, 2014 to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint in this case. All parties consent to the
relief requested herein.
Statement of Points and Authorities
Public Resource was served with the summons and complaint in this case on June 2,
2014. Counsel for all parties conferred by telephone on June 11, at which time counsel for Public
Resource requested the plaintiffs’ consent to a 21-day extension of time to respond to the
complaint, to July 14, 2014. Counsel for plaintiffs consented to this relief by email on June 12.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1) provides that the court may extend a filing deadline for good
cause. Good cause exists here because all parties consent to the requested extension, because no
party will be prejudiced by it, and because no other deadlines have yet been set in this case that
would be affected by it.
ACCORDINGLY, Public Resource respectfully requests that the court grant Public
Resource an extension until July 14, 2014 to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint.
Dated: July 7, 2014
/s/ Mitchell L. Stoltz
Mitchell L. Stoltz
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION
815 Eddy Street
San Francisco, CA 94109
Telephone: (415) 436-9333
Facsimile: (415) 436-9993
Attorneys for Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?