NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Filing 21

MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply by ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE, NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER, NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Sur-Reply, #2 Statement of Facts, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Gupta, Deepak)

Download PDF
Case 1:16-cv-00745-ESH Document 21 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. Case No. 16-745-ESH PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY The plaintiffs respectfully seek leave to file the attached one-paragraph sur-reply to address two new points raised in the government’s reply in support of its motion to dismiss. See Ben-Kotel v. Howard Univ., 319 F.3d 532, 536 (D.C. Cir. 2003) (“The district court routinely grants such motions [for leave to file a surreply] when a party is unable to contest matters presented to the court for the first time in the last scheduled pleading.”); Fischer v. FBI, Civ. 07-2037ESH, 2008 WL 2248711, at *1 (D.D.C. 2008) (Huvelle, J.) (same). The government opposes this request. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Deepak Gupta DEEPAK GUPTA JONATHAN E. TAYLOR GUPTA WESSLER PLLC 1735 20th Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 Phone: (202) 888-1741 deepak@guptawessler.com, jon@guptawessler.com August 17, 2016       WILLIAM H. NARWOLD MOTLEY RICE LLC 3333 K Street NW, Suite 450 Washington, DC 20007 Phone: (202) 232-5504 bnarwold@motleyrice.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Case 1:16-cv-00745-ESH Document 21 Filed 08/17/16 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on August 17, 2016, I filed the foregoing motion for leave to file a sur-reply through this Court’s CM/ECF system, and that all parties required to be served have been thereby served. /s/ Deepak Gupta Deepak Gupta      

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?