MANAFORT v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al

Filing 1

COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5271681) filed by PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Appointment Order, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Indictment, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet, # 4 Summons (DOJ), # 5 Summons (Liu), # 6 Summons (Mueller), # 7 Summons (Rosenstein), # 8 Summons (Sessions))(Downing, Kevin)

Download PDF
Exhibit A (©ffice of tqe g}cput J\tiortte}:J ®eneral l!lu.sl1ington, .<!!. 20530 ORDER NO. 3915-2017 APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL TO INVESTIGATE RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE WITH THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AND RELATED MATTERS By virtue of the authority vested in me as Acting Attorney General, including 28 U.S.C. §§ 509, 510, and 515, in order to discharge my responsibility to provide supervision and management of the Department of Justice, and to ensure a full and thorough investigation of the Russian govemmenfs efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, I hereby order as follows: (a) Robert S. Mueller III is appointed t() serve as Specia] Counsel for the United States Department of Justice. (b) The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confinned by then-FBI Director James 8. Corney in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including: (i) any links and/or coordination bet ween the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and (ii) (iii) (c) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a). If the Special Counsel believes it is necessary and appropriate, the Special Counsel is authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters. (d) Sections 600.4 through 600. l 0 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations are applicable to the Special Counsel. Date ' 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?