Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. v. The Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel
Filing
32
MOTION for preliminary injunction by Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc.. (Attachments: #
1 Text of Proposed Order)(Von Spiegelfeld, Allen)
Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. v. The Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel
Doc. 32
Case 8:07-cv-00616-JSM-MSS
Document 32
Filed 08/07/2007
Page 1 of 18
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Tampa Division In Admiralty
ODYSSEY MARINE EXPLORATION, INe.
Plaintiff
CIVIL ACTION
Case No: 8:07-CV-00616-JSM-MSS
THE UNIDENTIFIED SHIPWRECKED VESSEL its apparel, tackle, appurtenances and cargo located within a five mile radius of the center coordinates provided to the Court under seal
Defendant; in rem
and
The Kingdom of Spain
Claimant.
PLAINTIFF' S MOTION FOR ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
Plaintiff, Odyssey Marine Exploration,
Inc. (" Odyssey
), by its
undersigned
counsel , hereby moves for entry of an Order granting a preliminary injunction temporarily
enjoining and prohibiting any third parties from conducting search and/or recovery operations or
conducting activities that would disturb the Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel in any manner or
that would interfere with Odyssey s exclusive rights to recover the Defendant Unidentified
Shipwrecked Vessel,
its apparel , tackle,
appurtenances and cargo located within a five mile
Dockets.Justia.com
).
Case 8:07-cv-00616-JSM-MSS Document 32 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 18
radius of the center point coordinates of
which have been provided to the Court under seal
Shipwrecked Vessel"
(hereinafter referred to as the "Unidentified
Plaintiff warants to the
Court that it shall monitor evidence of activity related to the Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel
and give notice of the Order to any third party coming within the area of the Defendant
Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel.
The grounds supporting this motion are set forth in the accompanymg
memorandum of law, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Respectfully submitted
Dated:
August 6, 2007
s/ Allen von Spiegelfeld Allen von Spiegelfeld - FBN 256803 avonsp fowlerwhite. com Eric C. Thiel - FBN 016267 ethiel fowlerwhi te. com FOWLER WHITE BOGGS BANKER P. O. Box 1438 Tampa, Florida 33601 (813) 228-7411
Facsimile: (813) 229- 8313
Attorneys for Plaintiff
, /:
Case 8:07-cv-00616-JSM-MSS
Document 32
Filed 08/07/2007
Page 3 of 18
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Tampa Division In Admiralty
ODYSSEY MARINE EXPLORATION, INC.
Plaintiff
CNIL ACTION
: Case No: 8:07-CV-00616-JSM-MSS
THE UNIDENTIFIED SHIPWRECKED VESSEL its apparel, tackle, appurtenances and cargo located within a five mile radius of the center coordinates provided to the Court under seal
Defendant; in rem
and
The Kingdom of Spain
Claimant
PLAINTIFF' S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR ORDER GRATING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
Plaintiff, Odyssey Marne Exploration, Inc. (" Odyssey ), by its
undersigned counsel ,
respectfully submits this memorandum oflaw in support of its
motion for entry of an Order granting a preliminary injunction temporarily enjoining and
prohibiting any third parties from conducting search and/or recovery operations or
conducting activities that would disturb the Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel in any
manner or that would interfere with Odyssey s exclusive rights to recover the Defendant
Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel, its apparel, tackle, appurtenances and cargo located
Case 8:07-cv-00616-JSM-MSS
Document 32
Filed 08/07/2007
Page 4 of 18
within a five mile radius of the center point coordinates of which have been provided to
the Court under seal (hereinafter referred to as the "Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel"
BACKGROUND
The Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel rests on the sea floor at a depth of
approximately 500 meters, beyond the terrtorial waters or contiguous zone of any
sovereign nation. It is located in the Mediterranean Sea. The Unidentified Shipwrecked
Vessel' s position is located within a five mile radius of the center point coordinates
which have been provided to the Court under seal. While it is believed that one or two
other salvors may have conducted operations in the past relative to the Unidentified
Shipwrecked Vessel, to Odyssey s knowledge and belief, no operations other than those
by Odyssey have been conducted within the past year, and no salvor has sought to protect
an interest in the Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel through an arrest.
Odyssey first located the Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel in Januar
2006 , using sophisticated sonar and magnetometer equipment. Odyssey has recovered
aricles from the Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel and is ready and able to conduct
further operations to explore and document the shipwreck , consistent with archaeological
protocols appropriate for this Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel , and to recover additional
arifacts from the Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel.
When Odyssey first filed the initial Complaint, it had surveyed the wreck
site and had begun an archaeological pre-disturbance survey taking video and
photographs of the Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel. Odyssey believes that the vessel
associated with the wreck site is an Italian-registered passenger ship which sank in 1915
during Wodd War I.
,"
Case 8:07-cv-00616-JSM-MSS
Document 32
Filed 08/07/2007
Page 5 of 18
Subsequent to the arrest and this Court' s order appointing Odyssey as
Substitute Custodian, Odyssey recovered additional arifacts from the Unidentified
Shipwrecked Vessel which are undergoing conservation according to strict
archaeological protocols. Odyssey has prepared a Preliminary Site Assessment
(hereinafter PSA") regarding the Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel and the artifacts
recovered and wil present that to the Court under seal. Odyssey has filed a Motion for
Protective Order which references the PSA and the need for assurance that the PSA wil
be kept confidential prior to filing. Nothing recovered to date from the subject
Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel confirms an interest in the artifacts of any third party
including the Kingdom of Spain. Odyssey is prepared to release certain information from
the PSA as directed by the Court to Claimant, Spain. On March 25 2007 , the Court
directed Odyssey to publish a Notice of Arrest in newspapers in Spain and Italy.
Odyssey shall abide by the Court' s order and publish Notice ofthe Arest, however
Odyssey submits that given the information garnered from the items recovered thus far
there is nothing which would require that the Kingdom of Spain or any other third party be given any more specific information other than the Notice itself and that which is
contained in this Amended Complaint and the Exhibits which are part of the public
record.
Odyssey s survey and recovery operation has been, and wil continue to
, conducted in accordance with all appropriate archaeological protocols and under the
direction of an experienced nautical archaeologist.
Odyssey, its agents and associates, have invested substantial time, money
and effort in locating, surveying and photographing the Unidentified Shipwrecked
Case 8:07-cv-00616-JSM-MSS
Document 32
Filed 08/07/2007
Page 6 of 18
Vessel, and in planning the archaeological recovery of the arifacts from the Unidentified
Shipwrecked Vessel.
Odyssey, its agents and associates, have been actively, voluntarily and
successfully engaged in the process of reducing arifacts from the Unidentified
Shipwrecked Vessel to the Plaintiffs
exclusive custody, possession,
dominion and
control , as circumstances permit, and Odyssey has the present ability and intention to
continue to do so during the pendency of this action.
Odyssey s recovery of artifacts from this and other sites has been the
subject of intense international media attention especially in Spain. Many Spanish media
reports have been filled with inaccuracies including false claims that artifacts were
recovered ilegally from Spanish terrtorial waters. As a result of the false reports, and
despite Odyssey s continued assurance that no artifacts have been recovered anywhere
near Spanish terrtorial waters, Odyssey became the subject of a criminal investigation in
Spain. In fact, Odyssey became aware through the Spanish press that Spanish authorities
would intercept and inspect Odyssey
Explorer)
s vessels (the
Ocean Alert
and the
Odyssey
if they attempted to depart Gibraltar where they were docked. Odyssey
attorneys were denied access to the order, however, and were told that the order was
secret." Odyssey s attempts to appear in its defense were unsuccessful. Thus, Odyssey
prepared a Sworn Statement of Gregory P. Stemm, Odyssey s Cofounder, explaining
Odyssey s actions and the facts surrounding the arrest, the recovery, and the subsequent
claims and baseless detention of Odyssey s ships by Spain. (A copy of the Sworn
Statement including all Exhibits was attached to the Amended Complaint).
Case 8:07-cv-00616-JSM-MSS
Document 32
Filed 08/07/2007
Page 7 of 18
Despite the fact that Odyssey provided the Sworn Statement and further
information regarding its recovery to Spanish officials , and despite the assurance of the
Spanish criminal judge (Judge Juan Jose Navas Blanquez sitting in substitution of the
Judge for the Number Three First Instance and Preliminary Investigating Court of La
Linea de la Concepcion and district -
a different
judge from the one who signed the
original "secret order ), that Odyssey s vessels would not be boarded without the
consent of the Master or forcibly taken to a Spanish port, on July 12 , 2007, while
Odyssey was moving its vessel the Ocean Alert
from Gibraltar, and while the vessel was
in international waters, Spain boarded the vessel under protest from the Master and
ilegally seized the vessel forcing
it into the Spanish port of Algeciras. Having alerted the
Ocean Alert
Spanish media to the boarding and seizure, Spanish authorities paraded the
along the coastline for photograph and video opportnities. Additionally, despite her
protests , officials seized the personal computer of one of Odyssey s attorneys , Marie
Rogers , and ilegally copied all attorney/client privileged information regarding Odyssey
and other clients. As of the date of this Amended Complaint, the computer has been
returned without the hard drive. The original hard drive and copy are retained in the
custody of the court. A formal complaint and request for the return of the hard drive and
all copies taken has been made to the court and is currently pending decision by the Judge
as to the legitimacy of the seizure of the laptop.
Once in Algeciras, Odyssey s crew and attorneys were forced by the
Spanish officials to sit in the scalding sun for approximately seven hours without food or
water or use of the restroom. Their passports were taken (but returned later that day)
as
were all oftheir electronic equipment (of which the hard drives have been removed and
Case 8:07-cv-00616-JSM-MSS
Document 32
Filed 08/07/2007
Page 8 of 18
only the empty laptops returned). The
Odyssey Explorer
remains blockaded in Gibraltar
by virte of the criminal order and threatened seizure by Spain. Odyssey s rights granted
by this Court to continue its recovery have been restricted by Spain, and Odyssey
damages as a result of Spain s conduct are extensive.
II.
STANDARD FOR GRANTING INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
In this Circuit, the four requirements for awarding preliminary injunctive
relief are:
(1)
a substantial likelihood that the party requesting relief wil ultimately succeed on the merits; the party requesting relief wil suffer irreparable injury if the injunction is not issued; that threatened injury to the moving party outweighs harm to the opposing party; and the injunction, if issued, wil not be adverse to the public interest.
(2)
(3)
(4)
See Siegel v.
Lepore 234 F. 3d 1163 (11 th Cir. 2000);
1561-62 (11 th Cir. 1989),
Haitian Refugee Center, Inc.
aff'
498 U. S.
479 (1991);
Nelson
States v.
872 F.2d 1555 ,
United
Alabama
791 F.2d 1450, 1459 no lO (11
h Cir. 1986),
cert. denied 479 U. S. 1085
(1987).
As set forth below, Odyssey satisfies each of these four requirements. Therefore , an award of a preliminary injunctive relief is appropriate in this matter.
III.
ARGUMENT
There Is A Substantial Likelihood That Odyssey Will Ultimately Succeed
On The Merits Of Its Claims
This is a salvage case involving admiralty and maritime claims under the
);
Case 8:07-cv-00616-JSM-MSS
Document 32
Filed 08/07/2007
Page 9 of 18
law of salvage and the law of finds. !
Regardless of
which legal theory is ultimately
ultimately
found to apply to the case, there is a substantial likelihood that Odyssey wil
succeed on the merits of either or both of its claims or under its claim for equitable relief
based on quantum meruit and unjust enrchment.
There Is A Substantial Likelihood That Odyssey Wil Ultimately Succeed
On The Merits Of Its Claim Under The Law Of Finds
The martime law of finds gives title to a person who has reduced to
possession an object which has been abandoned at sea.
See Columbus-America
Discovery Group
v.
The Unidentifed,
Wrecked and Abandoned Sailng
Vessel 974 F.
450 (4
Cir. 1992),
cert. denied 507 U. S. 1000 (1993). This doctrine has been
consistently recognized in admiralty, and courts have awarded title to shipwrecks to the
finder when warranted by the facts.
See Treasure Salvors,
Inc.
v.
The Unidentifed,
Wrecked and Abandoned Sailng Vessel 569 F.2d 330 337 (5
Salvors 1);
Cir. 1978)
(Treasure
Wrecked
Martha s Vineyard Scuba Headquarters, Inc.
v.
The Unidentifed,
As a case involving an admiralty and maritime claim, this Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter pursuant to the Constitution of the United States 1333 , and Rule 9(h) ofthe Federal Rules of Article II , Section 2, Clause 1 , 28 U.S. e. Civil Procedure. Claims arising out of salvage operations are unquestionably within the v. Unidentifed See Treasure Salvors, Inc. admiralty jurisdiction of the federal courts. (Treasure Wrecked and Abandoned Sailng Vessel 640 F.2d 560, 566-67 (5 Cir. 1981) Salvors 111). Furthermore, U. S. admiralty courts unquestionably have jurisdiction to
adjudicate salvage claims based on salvage operations that occur on the high seas.
See
Treasure Salvors 111 640 F.2d at 566-67 ("The subject matter jurisdiction thus granted is not limited to causes of action arising from acts or occurrences on the terrtorial waters res within the United States. Treasure Salvors 1 569 F.2d at 334 ("the presence of the the district is not an absolute prerequisite to the court' s jurisdiction. ). It is common for jurisdiction over shipwrecks located in international S. admiralty courts to assert in rem waters and even within the terrtorial seas of foreign nations. See Marex v. Unidentifed Wrecked and Abandoned Vessel 952 F. Supp. 825 828 (S.D. Ga. 1997); MS. Titanic Bemis Inc. v. The Wrecked and Abandoned Vessel 924 F. Supp. 714 (E.D. Va. 1996); R.M. S. Lusitania, 884 F. Supp. 1042 (B.D. Va. 1995), aff' 99 F. 3d 1129 (4 Cir. 1996), cert. denied 118 S. Ct. 1558 (1998).
Case 8:07-cv-00616-JSM-MSS
Document 32
Filed 08/07/2007
Page 10 of 18
and Abandoned Vessel 833 F.2d
1059 , 1065 (1
st Cir. 1987); Indian River Recovery
The CHINA 645 F. Supp. 141 (D. Del. 1986).
A finding of abandonment may be inferred from all of the relevant facts
and circumstances, and may be based on circumstantial evidence.
Zych v.
Unidentifed,
Wrecked and Abandoned Vessel Believed to be the LADY ELGIN 755 F. Supp. 213 , 214
(N. D. Ill. 1991),
aff'
960 F. 2d 665 (7th Cir. 1992). Under the facts of this case, there is
a substantial likelihood that Odyssey wil be able to prove that the Defendant
Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel has been abandoned by its original owner. The
Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel is located beyond the terrtorial waters or contiguous
zone of any sovereign nation. It is believed to be an Italian-registered passenger ship
which san almost a hundred years ago. To Odyssey s information and belief, no third
party has made an effort to recover the ship and the wreck has been abandoned
altogether. The artifacts recovered have failed to provide evidence which would suggest
anything other than an abandonment. Thus, the Court should find that the Unidentified
Shipwrecked Vessel and the arifacts recovered have been abandoned and award title to
Odyssey under the maritime law of finds.
There Is A Substantial Likelihood That Odyssey Wil Ultimately
Succeed On The Merits Of Its Claim Under The Law Of Salvage
The common law of salvage applies to property that is lost at sea but has
not been abandoned by its original owner. The law of salvage grants a liberal reward to
those who voluntarily engage in efforts to save a vessel in peril at sea, and it promotes the
orderly recovery of such property.
See The BLACKWALL 77 U. S. 1 (1869). It is well
recognized that three elements must be established in order to present a salvage claim:
,"
Case 8:07-cv-00616-JSM-MSS
Document 32
Filed 08/07/2007
Page 11 of 18
(1)
a marine peril from which the property could not have been rescued without the assistance of the salvor;
(2)
service voluntarily rendered when not required as a pre-existing duty; and
success , in whole or in part, of recovery of the imperilled property.
Treasure Salvors, Inc. v.
(3)
See The SABINE 101 U. S. 384 (1879);
The Unidentifed
Wrecked and Abandoned Sailing Vessel
930 (S.D. Fla. 1981)
1974)).
(citing Legnos v.
Nuestra Senora de Atocha
546 F. Supp. 919
h Cir.
M/W Olga Jacob 498 F.2d 666 669 (5
Odyssey s activities with respect to the Defendant Unidentified
Shipwrecked Vessel satisfy all three of these elements, and therefore is a salvage
operation within the meaning of the law.
The Defendant Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel Is In Marine Peril
A marine peril "includes more than the threat of storm, fire or piracy to a
vessel in navigation.
Treasure Salvors 1
569
F.2d at 337. The concept of marine peril
in peril
also includes a sunken vessel which is discovered after being long lost but is " stil
of being lost through actions ofthe elements.
Unidentifed Remains
614 F.2d 1051 (5
Id. See also Platoro Ltd.,
Inc.
h Cir. 1980); Fort Myers Shell
Dredging Co.
Barge NBC512 404 F.2d 137 , 139 (5 Cir. 1968) (the "peril required in salvage service
need not necessarily be one of imminent or absolute danger, either presently or
reasonably to be apprehended. ). The Defendant Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel is in
danger from rival salvors who may attempt to locate and recover it and additional
artifacts with " grab buckets " and without regard to archaeological protocols or proper
conservation techniques. Thus, the Defendant Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel satisfies
Case 8:07-cv-00616-JSM-MSS
Document 32
Filed 08/07/2007
Page 12 of 18
the definition of marne peril because it is "stil
the elements. See Treasure Salvors 1
569
in peril of
being lost through actions of
F.2d at 337.
Odyssey Is Voluntarly Rendering Service When Not Required As A
Pre- Existing Duty
Odyssey is under no duty to recover the Defendant Unidentified
Shipwrecked Vessel. Instead, it is voluntarily rendering service to rescue the Defendant
Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel from being lost forever through the action of the
elements in the sea and
from the possibility that the artifacts wil be hastily recovered by
salvors without regard for the Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel' s historic and
archaeological value. Accordingly, Odyssey has satisfied the second element of a
salvage claim.
Odyssey Is Substantially Likely To Succeed, In Whole Or In Part,
In Recovering The Imperiled Property
Odyssey has already demonstrated that it is capable of finding, surveying
and photographing a large wreck site beneath 500 meters depth or deeper. Odyssey is
ready, wiling and able to continue its recovery operations. Moreover, Odyssey has the
equipment , manpower and experience required to successfully complete archaeological
recovery operations.
Odyssey desires to resume its search for and recover additional artifacts
from the Defendant Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel. Odyssey has taken constructive
possession of the wreck site to the extent its age, depth and historical significance permit.
Accordingly, Odyssey is substantially likely to succeed in recovering the imperiled
property, and it has satisfied the final element of a successful salvage claim.
Case 8:07-cv-00616-JSM-MSS
Document 32
Filed 08/07/2007
Page 13 of 18
Any Assertion By Spain Or Any Other Potential Claimant That It Has
Successfully Refused Salvage Would Be Irrelevant.
Insofar as Spain may assert that it has properly refused salvage for all
Spanish shipwreck-sites -- irrespective of their location, disposition, and character--
Plaintiff would assert that such would be irrelevant with respect to the Defendant
Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel. As stated, no evidence from the Defendant
Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel confirms that Spain has an interest in the vessel. In any
event , Claimant Spain could never satisfy the maritime law s stringent standard for an
effective refusal of salvage, insofar as (1) it is not in actual possession ofthe Defendant
Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel, (2) a prudent mariner would not refuse salvage under
circumstances such as this, (3) Plaintiff acted in good faith to recover property and
investigated the origin of property; and (4) in any event, a party purporting to disclaim
salvage may only do so for its property and not for that owned by other parties. See
Merritt Chapman Derrick Wrecking Co. v. United States,
274 U. S. 611 , 613 (1927);
Tidewater Salvage, Inc.
v.
Weyerhaeuser Co.,
633 F. 2d 1304, 1307 (9th Cir.1980).
Courts have made it a legal presumption that owners of property lost at sea desire to have
their property salvaged, and the burden would necessarly rest on a pary to conclusively
prove that they had effectively refused salvage services. See
MS. Titanic, Inc.
Haver 171 F. 3d 943 963 (4th Cir. 1999).
Defendant Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel is Located Beyond the
Terrtorial Sea or
Contiguous Zone of any Nation.
No nation may interfere with shipwreck recovery activities, unless such
are occurrng within that nation s terrtorial sea or contiguous
zone. A nation
s terrtorial
Case 8:07-cv-00616-JSM-MSS
Document 32
Filed 08/07/2007
Page 14 of 18
sea is measured from the shoreline (or baselines along the coast) out to a maximum of 12
nautical miles. A nation s contiguous zone is (as the name implies) contiguous with a
terrtorial sea, and extends out a maximum of an additional 12 nautical miles, making for
a total maximum of24 nautical miles. See United States v.
Hidalgo-Gato
703 F.2d 1267
(11 th Cir.
1983). Even in a nation s contiguous zone, a coastal state s competence is
United States v. McRary,
limited. See
665 F.2d 674 677 n.4 (5 h Cir. Unit B 1982) (" the
control of the United States over foreign boats in the contiguous zone is limited to the
enforcement of customs, fiscal, immigration or sanitary regulations.
The Defendant Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel is not located within the
terrtorial sea or
contiguous zone of any nation. Plaintiffs have already filed with this
Court , under seal, coordinates of the area in which the Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel
is located. Odyssey wil file under seal a nautical char depicting the location of the site
described in the subject Amended Complaint. It is undisputed that the Unidentified
Shipwrecked Vessel is not located within 24 nautical miles of any nation s coastline, and
is thus not within any nation s terrtorial sea or contiguous zone.
Odyssey Wil Suffer Irreparable Iniury If Iniunctive Relief Is Not Issued
Odyssey has expended considerable resources in locating, studying and
surveying the Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel, in photographing and documenting the
Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel, and in developing an archaeological excavation and
conservation plan as well as in recovering the artifacts and in preserving their historical
value. Odyssey has committed its financial resources, time, manpower, equipment and its
vessels to these efforts. To allow others to come in at this time and reap the benefits of
Odyssey s labor would constitute irreparable harm and injury to Odyssey for which there
Case 8:07-cv-00616-JSM-MSS
Document 32
Filed 08/07/2007
Page 15 of 18
would be no adequate remedy at law.
See Treasure Salvors
546 F. Supp. at 929;
Deep
Cal. 1995),
Sea Research, Inc.
aff'
v.
The Brother Jonathan 883 F. Supp. 1343 , 1362 (N. D.
Cir. 1997),
102 F. 3d 379 (9
aff' d in part, vacated in part and remanded 118 S.
Ct. 144 (1998).
As the Fifth Circuit explained in
Treasure Salvors III:
A salvor. . . has a valuable interest in his salvage operations which the law protects by vesting in the salvor certain rights. Among the most important of these rights are the right to exclude others from paricipating in the salvage operations , so long as the original salvor appears ready, wiling and able to complete the salvage project, and the right to possession of the salved property, a right exclusive even of the owner, until such time as the salvage lien on the property is extinguished or adequate security for this obligation is given.
640 F. 2d at 567.
Odyssey risks violation of its legal rights and substantial investment to
date if the Court does not award preliminary injunctive relief. Consequently, the Court
should enter a preliminar injunction protecting Odyssey s continued right to exclusive
possession of the Defendant Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel, and protecting it from
interference from rival salvors.
Odyssey s Potential Iniury Outweighs The Iniury Of Any Other Party
Odyssey is the only party which has expended any resources in the search
for and recovery of the Defendant Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel. Further, the
Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel is located beyond the terrtorial waters or contiguous
zone of any sovereign nation. There is no evidence currently which would confirm the
interest of any third party to the site or to the arifacts recovered therefrom.
Odyssey s knowledge and belief, no operations other then those by Odyssey have been
Case 8:07-cv-00616-JSM-MSS
Document 32
Filed 08/07/2007
Page 16 of 18
conducted within the past year and no salvor has sought to reduce the Unidentified
Shipwrecked Vessel to its possession or to protect the Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel
through an arrest.
Consequently, Odyssey s potential injury outweighs the injury of any
other pary, since Odyssey wil suffer serious irreparable injury if an injunction is not
issued , and it is unlikely that any other party wil suffer injury if preliminar injunctive
relief is awarded to Odyssey.
An Iniunction Wil
Not Be Adverse To The
Public Interest
Odyssey is committed to recovering the Defendant Unidentified
Shipwrecked Vessel in a manner that benefits the public interest. The recovery operation
and artifact preservation has been and wil
continue to be
conducted in accordance with
strict archaeological protocols. Furthermore, Odyssey intends to make certain of the
recovered arifacts available for public display and educational purposes as well as
historic and scientific study. Consequently, the issuance of an injunction wil
not be
adverse to the public interest. To the contrary, the issuance of a preliminar injunction
permitting Odyssey to conduct a competent, safe, scientific and successful recovery of
the Defendant Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel can only benefit the public interest.
See
Treasure Salvors 546 F. Supp. at 929.
IV.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, Odyssey respectfully requests that the Court
grant its motion for entry of an Order granting a preliminary injunction temporarily enjoining and prohibiting any third parties from conducting search and/or recovery
operations or conducting activities that would disturb the Unidentified Shipwrecked
Case 8:07-cv-00616-JSM-MSS
Document 32
Filed 08/07/2007
Page 17 of 18
Vessel in any maner or that would interfere with Odyssey s exclusive rights to salvage
the Defendant Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel within the areas described in the
Complaint.
Respectfully submitted
Dated:
August 6, 2007
s/ Allen von S?iegelfeld Allen von Spiegelfeld - FBN 256803 avonsp~fowlerwhite. com Eric C. Thiel- FBN 016267 ethiel~fow lerwhite. com FOWLER WHITE BOGGS BANKER P. O. Box 1438 Tampa , Florida 33601 (813) 228-7411
Facsimile: (813) 229- 8313
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Case 8:07-cv-00616-JSM-MSS
Document 32
Filed 08/07/2007
Page 18 of 18
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on August 6, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing
with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which wil
send a notice of electronic
filing to James A. Goold, Covington & Burling LLP , 1201 Pennsylvania Ave. , NW, Washington
DC 20004, Attorneys for Claimant, Kingdom of Spain.
s/ Allen von Spiegelfeld Allen von Spiegelfeld - FBN 256803 avonsp~fowlerwhite. com Eric C. Thiel- FBN 016267 ethiel~fowlerwhite. com FOWLER WHITE BOGGS BANKER P. O. Box 1438 Tampa, Florida 33601 (813) 228-7411
Facsimile: (813) 229- 8313
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?