Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al
MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs of Administrative Expenses by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as successor by merger to Wachovia Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit as to Attorneys' Fees and Costs, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Affidavit as to Reasonableness of Attorneys' Fees and Costs, # 3 Exhibit 3 - Proposed Order, # 4 Exhibit 4 - Excerpts of Applicable Attorneys' Fee Provision)(Wirth, Steven) Modified on 12/4/2017 refiled with corrected pleading at 1334 Motion (BES).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
SCOOP CAPITAL, LLC,
SCOOP MANAGEMENT, INC.,
CASE NO.: 8:09-0087-T-26TBM
SCOOP REAL ESTATE, L.P.,
VALHALLA INVESTMENT PARTNERS, L.P.,
VALHALLA MANAGEMENT, INC.,
VICTORY IRA FUND, LTD.,
VICTORY FUND, LTD.,
VIKING IRA FUND, LLC.,
VIKING FUND, LLC., and
VIKING MANAGEMENT, LLC.
WELLS FARGO’S MOTION FOR PAYMENT OF CERTAIN
FEES AND COSTS AS ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo” or “Bank”)1 moves this Court for an Order
compelling the Receiver to reimburse the Bank for specific fees and costs incurred in defense
of the Bank’s property rights and security interests, against the claims made and positions taken
by the Receiver, as an administrative expense, and states:
Wells Fargo is successor by merger to Wachovia Bank, N.A. (“Wachovia”).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?