Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al
Filing
216
MOTION to Approve Settlement re: Robert Beale and Virginia Beale by Burton W. Wiand. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Executed Settlement Agreement re the Beale's)(Nelson, Carl)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al
Doc. 216 Att. 1
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, by order dated Januar 21, 2009, the Court in Securities & Exch.
Comm'n v. Arhur NadeL, et a1., Case No. 8:09-cv-87-T-26TBM (M.D. Fla.) (the "SEC
Receivership Action"), appointed Burton W. Wiand as Receiver (the "Receiver") for
Scoop Real Estate, L.P.; Scoop Management, Inc.; Scoop Real Estate, L.P.; Valhalla
Investment Parners, L.P.; Valhalla Management, Inc.; Victory IRA Fund, LTD; Victory
Fund, LTD; Viking Ira Fund, LLC; Viking Fund, LLC; and Viking Management and all
oftheir subsidiares, successors, and assigns (collectively, the "Receivership Entities");
and
WHEREAS, the Receiver intends to commence a lawsuit in the United States
District Court for the Middle District seeking the return of certain funds received from or
at the direction of one or more of the Receivership Entities by Robert Beale and Virginia
Beale ("the Beales")in excess of
their investment; and
WHEREAS, the Beales, without admitting liability, wish to resolve these matters
amicably; and
WHEREAS, any resolution of this action by agreement of the Receiver and the
Beales is subject to approval by the Court presiding over the SEC Receivership Action,
NOW, THEREFORE, and subject to the approval of the SEC Receivership Court,
the Beales, have agreed to pay and the Receiver has agreed to accept a total of
$29,331.42 in full settlement of the claims to be asserted in the lawsuit, receipt of
which
is hereby acknowledged. Upon clearing of the settlement payment, the Receiver, on
behalf of the Receivership Entities and their employees, agents, representatives,
beneficiaries, and assigns, shall be deemed to have released and forever discharged the
Beales of and from any and all claims which could have been asserted by the Receiver, as
1
EXHIBIT
A
Dockets.Justia.com
well as any and all other claims, demands, rights, promises, and obligations arising from
or related in any way to the Beales' investment in any product, fund, entity, or venture
established, operated, or controlled by Arhur Nadel and the Receivership Entities.
In further consideration of the release of claims described above, the Beales
warrant that $32,590.47 is the total amount of
money or value the Beales received from
Receivership Entities in excess of the investment, and the Beales agree to waive and do
hereby waive any claim that they had, have, or hereafter may have against the Receiver
and/or the Receivership Estate.
The Receiver and the Beales understand and agree that, subject to the approval of
the SEC Receivership Court, the payment of the aforesaid total sum and waiver of claims
is in full accord and satisfaction of and in compromise of disputed claims, and the
payment and waiver are not an admission of liability, which is expressly denied, but are
made for the purpose of
terminating dispute and avoiding litigation.
After execution of this Settlement Agreement by all parties, the Receiver wil
promptly move the SEC Receivership Court for approval of this settlement. The Beales
understand and agree that each party shall bear their own individual costs and attorney
fees incurred in the resolution of this matter.
The Receiver and the Beales agree this Settlement Agreement shall be governed
by and be enforceable under Florida law in the United States District Court for the
Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division.
The Receiver and the Beales also agree that electronically transmitted copies of
signature pages wil have the full force and affect of original signed pages.
In witness whereof the paries have set their hands as of
the dates indicated.
2
Robert Beale
~¿J
of
Burton W. Wiand, As Receiver
the Receivership Entities
-.
Virginia Beale
/
Date: ¡cJ."7 Lq
, .1 .f
Date: I 0 J ~ I¡¿ lJ c;
ri/
42385772vl
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?