Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al

Filing 457

MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment and Notice of Filing Consent of Defendant Arthur Nadel by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Consent of Defendant Arthur Nadel, #2 Text of Proposed Order (Proposed Judgment of Permanent Injunction and Other Relief As to Defendant Arthur Nadel))(Masel, Scott)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 8:09-cv-87-T-26TBM ARTHUR NADEL, SCOOP CAPITAL, LLC, SCOOP MANAGEMENT, INC. Defendants, SCOOP REAL ESTATE, L.P., VALHALLA INVESTMENT PARTNERS, L.P., VALHALLA MANAGEMENT, INC., VICTORY IRA FUND, LTD, VICTORY FUND, LTD, VIKING IRA FUND, LLC, VIKING FUND, LLC, AND VIKING MANAGEMENT Relief Defendants. / JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF AS TO DEFENDANT ARTHUR NADEL Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission commenced this action by filing its Complaint against, among others, Defendant Arthur Nadel. In its Amended Complaint, the Commission sought, among other relief against Nadel, a permanent injunction to prohibit violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)], and Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5]; disgorgement and prejudgment interest; and a civil money penalty pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(d)] and Section 21(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)]. Nadel entered a general appearance and, by the attached Consent, consented to the Court's jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Judgment of Permanent Injunction and Other Relief ("Judgment") without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction); waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from the Judgment. This Court having accepted Nadel's Consent, having jurisdiction over Nadel and the subject matter of this action: I. SECTION 17(a) OF THE SECURITIES ACT IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Nadel, his officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a) (b) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. 2 II. SECTION 10(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND RULE 10b-5 THEREUNDER IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Nadel, his officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) (b) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. III. DISGORGEMENT AND CIVIL PENALTY IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Nadel shall pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, prejudgment interest thereon, and a civil penalty pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(d)] and Section 21(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)]. The Court shall determine the amounts of the disgorgement and civil penalty upon motion of the Commission. Prejudgment interest shall be calculated from January 1, 2008, based on the rate of interest used by the Internal Revenue Service for the underpayment of federal income tax as set 3 forth in 26 U.S.C. § 6621(a)(2). In connection with the Commission's motion for disgorgement and/or civil penalties, and at any hearing held on such a motion: (a) Nadel will be precluded from arguing that he did not violate the federal securities laws as alleged in the Complaint; (b) Nadel may not challenge the validity of the Consent or this Final Judgment; (c) solely for the purposes of such motion, the allegations of the Complaint shall be accepted as and deemed true by the Court; and (d) the Court may determine the issues raised in the motion on the basis of affidavits, declarations, excerpts of sworn deposition or investigative testimony, and documentary evidence, without regard to the standards for summary judgment contained in Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In connection with the Commission's motion for disgorgement and/or civil penalties, the parties may take discovery, including discovery from appropriate non-parties. IV. INCORPORATION OF NADEL'S CONSENT IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Consent of Arthur Nadel is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Nadel shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. V. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Judgment. 4 VI. CERTIFICATION UNDER RULE 54(b) There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Judgment forthwith and without further notice. DONE AND ORDERED this ____ day of ____________, 2010 at Tampa, Florida. _____________________________________ RICHARD A. LAZZARA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Copies to all counsel and parties of record 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?