Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al
NOTICE by Burton W. Wiand re 757 Response Notice of Filing (Attachments: # 1 Governments Application for an Order Vacating the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture)(Cohen, Jonathan)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
SCOOP CAPITAL, LLC,
SCOOP MANAGEMENT, INC.,
CASE NO.: 8:09-cv-0087-T-26TBM
SCOOP REAL ESTATE, L.P.,
VALHALLA INVESTMENT PARTNERS, L.P.,
VALHALLA MANAGEMENT, INC.,
VICTORY FUND, LTD,
VIKING IRA FUND, LLC,
VIKING FUND, LLC, AND
VIKING MANAGEMENT, LLC.
NOTICE OF FILING
Burton Wiand, as Receiver, hereby provides notice of filing the attached
Government’s Application for an Order Vacating the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture
(“Government’s Application”), filed by the United States Attorney for the Southern District
of New York on February 29, 2012, in United States v. Arthur Nadel, Case No. 1:09-cr00433-JGK (S.D.N.Y.) (Doc. 95). The Government’s Application relates to the dispute
regarding this Court’s jurisdiction over certain Receivership assets purportedly subject to
forfeiture in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. See
Docs. 690, 712, 733, 745, 753, 757.
s/Jonathan B. Cohen_
Jonathan B. Cohen, FBN 0027620
Terry A. Smiljanich, FBN 145349
JAMES, HOYER, NEWCOMER &
One Urban Centre, Suite 550
4830 West Kennedy Blvd.
Tampa, FL 33609
Tel: (813) 397-2300
Fax: (813) 397-2310
Attorneys for the Receiver, Burton W. Wiand
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on March 1, 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing
with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that on March 1, 2012, I mailed the foregoing document
and the notice of electronic filing by first-class mail to the following non-CM/ECF
Arthur G. Nadel
Register No. 50690-018
FCI BUTNER LOW
Federal Correctional Institution
P.O. Box 999
Butner, NC 27509
s/Jonathan B. Cohen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?