Gainor v. Sidley, Austin, Brow

Filing 104

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply In Support of Their Motions to Dismiss and Respond to Plaintiffs' Motions to Compel by Arthur Andersen, LLP, Michael S. Marx, P. Anthony Nissley. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Austin, Michael)

Download PDF
Gainor v. Sidley, Austin, Brow Doc. 104 Case 1:06-cv-21748-JEM Document 104 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/18/2007 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division Case No. 06-21748 CIV-MARTINEZ/BANDSTRA MARK J. GAINOR and ELYSE GAINOR, Plaintiffs, v. SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP, et al. Defendants. / ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP'S, MARX'S, AND NISSLEY'S AGREED MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO FILE REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS TO COMPEL Defendants Arhur Andersen LLP, Michael S. Marx, and P. Anthony Nissley (collectively "Andersen") move the Cour, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b), for an enlargement of time through and including August 8, 2007 to file reply memoranda in support of Arthur Andersen's, Marx's, and Nissley's individual Motions to Dismiss and also respond to Plaintiffs' two motions to compeL. Plaintiffs, through counsel, have granted their agreement to this Motion. As grounds for this Motion, Andersen states: 1. On July 11, 2007, Plaintiffs fied Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Arthur Andersen LLP's Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Mar's Motion to Dismiss, and Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Nissley's Motion to Dismiss: 2. Also on July 11, 2007, Plaintiffs fied Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Defendants, Arhur Andersen and Merril Lynch, to Produce Initial Disclosures in Compliance with Rule 26(a) and Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel (a) Responses to Plaintiffs' Second Request for Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:06-cv-21748-JEM Document 104 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/18/2007 Page 2 of 4 Production of Documents to Defendants Arhur Andersen, Mar and Nissley and (b) Deposition Dates for Mar and Nissley (collectively "Motions to Compel"). 3. Pursuant to the Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant Arthur Andersen, LLP's Motion to Dismiss, and for Extension of Time for Defendants Arhur Andersen, LLP and Michael S. Marx and P. Anthony Nissley to File Their Reply Memoranda, Andersen's reply memoranda are due on July 25,2007. 4. Pursuant to Pacer's Docket Report, Andersen's responses to Plaintiffs' Motions to Compel are also due July 25, 2007. 5. Given the volume of briefing and other scheduling issues, counsel for Andersen needs additional time to submit its reply memoranda in support of its three motions to dismiss as well as respond to Plaintiffs' Motions to CompeL. 6. Counsel for Andersen has conferred with Plaintiffs' counseL. Plaintiffs' counsel has graciously agreed to the enlargement of time, through and including August 8, 2007 for Andersen to serve its reply memoranda and to respond to Plaintiffs' Motions to CompeL. With this Motion, undersigned counsel has provided the Court with a proposed order granting the requested enlargement of time. 2 Case 1:06-cv-21748-JEM Document 104 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/18/2007 Page 3 of 4 WHEREFORE, Andersen respectfully requests that this Cour enter an Order granting this Agreed Motion for Additional Time to File Replies in Support of Andersen's Motions to Dismiss and Respond to Plaintiffs' Motions to Compel through and including August 8, 2007. McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP By: sl: Michael G. Austin Michael G. Austin (FBN 0457205) E-mail: maustinêmwe.com 201 South Biscayne Blvd., Ste. 2200 Miami, Florida 33131 Tel: (305) 347-6511; Fax: (305) 347-6500 Of counsel: Douglas E. Whitney Jocelyn D. Francoeur McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 227 West Monroe Street Chicago, Ilinois 60606 (312) 372-2000 (312) 984-7700 FAX E-Mail: dwhitneyêmwe.com jfrancoeurêmwe.com Counsel for Arthur Andersen, LLP, Michael S. Marx and P. Anthony Nissley CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 18,2007, I electronically fied the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which automatically sends an electronic notification to CM/ECF participants. The foregoing document was also served on those counselor parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing identified on the attached Service List via first-class U.S. MaiL. sl Michael G. Austin Michael G. Austin 3 Case 1:06-cv-21748-JEM Document 104 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/18/2007 Page 4 of 4 SERVICE LIST Richard Benjamin Wilkes Richard W. Candelora Richard Benjamin Wilkes, P.A. Attorneys at Law Katherine Warthen Ezell 600 S. Magnolia Ave, Suite 200 Tampa, Florida 33606 813-254-6060 Fax: 813-254-6088 PODHURST ORSECK JOSEFSBERG, ET AL. 25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 800 City National Ban Bldg. Miami, Florida 33130-1780 305-358-2800 Fax: 305-358-2382 rwilkeslarbwilkes.com Attorneys for Plaintif KEzelllapodhurst.com Attorneys for Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, LLP Jonathan E. Altman Aaron M. May Gabriel P. Sanchez Brad D. Brian Stephen J. Anderson ANDERSON DAILEY LLP 2002 Sumit Blvd., Suite 1250 Atlanta, Georgia 30319 404442 1800 Fax: 404 442 1820 Julie Cantor Lisa Demsky Richard Drooyan Andersonlaandersondailev.com Attorney for Marc C. Klopfenstein RJ. Ruble MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 355 S. Grand Avenue, 35th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 613-683-9100 Fax: 613-683-3702 151 7 Avalon Square Glen Cover, New York 11542 J onathan.altmanlamto.com Aaron.mavlamto.com Gabriel.sanchezlamto.com Attorneys for Sidley Austin LLP Coren Harris Stem Bennett Falk Richard A. Morgan Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, P.c. 100 S.E. Second Street Bressler, Amery & Ross P.c. 2801 S.W. 149th Ave. Miramar, Florida 33027 954-499-7979 Miami, Florida 33131 305-347-4080 Fax 305-347-4089 csternlabressler.com Attorneys for Merril Lynch & Co., R.J Ruble Richard.more:anlabipc.com Attorneys for Mark C. Klopfenstein MIA 324677-1.065784.0026 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?