Gainor v. Sidley, Austin, Brow
Filing
143
Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply Arthur Andersen LLP's, Marx's and Nissley's Agreed Motion for Additional Time to File Replies in Support of their Motions to Dismiss and Respond to Plaintiffs' Motions to Compel by Arthur Andersen, LLP, Michael S. Marx, P. Anthony Nissley. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Austin, Michael)
Gainor v. Sidley, Austin, Brow
Doc. 143 Att. 1
Case 1:06-cv-21748-JEM
Document 143-2
Entered on FLSD Docket 08/08/2007
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division Case No. 06-21748-CIV-MARTINEZ/BANDSTRA MARK J. GAINOR and ELYSE GAINOR, Plaintiffs, v. SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP, et al. Defendants. ______________________________/ ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP'S, MARX'S, AND NISSLEY'S AGREED MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO FILE REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS TO COMPEL THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Arthur Andersen LLP's, Michael S. Marx's, and P. Anthony Nissley's (collectively "Andersen") Agreed Motion for Additional Time to File Replies in Support of Their Motions to Dismiss and Respond to Plaintiffs' Motions to Compel, and having reviewed the file and being otherwise fully advised, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. Andersen's Agreed Motion for Additional Time to File Replies in Support of
Their Motions to Dismiss and Respond to Plaintiffs' Motions to Compel is GRANTED; and 2. Defendant shall have through and including August 22, 2007, within which to file
replies in support of their motion to dismiss and respond to Plaintiffs' motions to compel.
MIA 325626-1.065784.0026
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 1:06-cv-21748-JEM
Document 143-2
Entered on FLSD Docket 08/08/2007
Page 2 of 2
DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at Miami-Dade County, Florida this ___ day of August, 2007.
United States District Judge Copies Furnished to: All Counsel of Record R.J. Ruble
2
MIA 325626-1.065784.0026
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?