Adelman et al v. Boy Scouts of America et al

Filing 175

NOTICE by Howard Adelman, Boy Scouts of America, Judith Sclawy-Adelman re 159 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Order to District Court, Resolution of Scheduled Appeal (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Peltz, Robert)

Download PDF
Adelman et al v. Boy Scouts of America et al Doc. 175 Att. 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. 10-CV-22236-ASG HOWARD ADELMAN AND JUDITH SCLAWY as Co-Personal Representatives of the ESTATE OF MICHAEL SCLAWY-ADELMAN, Plaintiffs, v. BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA; THE SOUTH FLORIDA COUNCIL INC., BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA; PLANTATION UNITED METHODIST CHURCH; HOWARD K. CROMPTON, Individually, and ANDREW L. SCHMIDT, Individually, Defendants. / ORDER DETERMINING PLAINTIFFS' APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER FOLLOWING FEBRUARY 11, 2011 DISCOVERY CONFERENCE MOOT THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard before the Court upon the stipulation of the Plaintiffs, Howard Adelman and Judith Sclawy, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Michael Sclawy-Adelman and the Defendant Boy Scouts of America, and the Court being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Plaintiffs' Appeal [D.E. 159] of the Magistrate Judge's Order following the February 11, 2011 Discovery Conference [D.E. 153] is hereby rendered MOOT based upon the representation of the Defendant that the requested information as stated in the appeal has been provided as an Exhibit to corporate representative depositions taken in this case. Dockets.Justia.com Adelman v. Boy Scouts of America et al. Case No.: 10-CV-22236-ASG Page 2 DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami-Dade County, Florida on ____________. ___________________________________ CHRIS McALILEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Copies to: The Honorable Alan S. Gold Counsel of Record

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?