Kardonick v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al

Filing 367

MOTION PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND PLAN OF ALLOCATION by David Kardonick. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 4-A, # 6 Exhibit 4-B, # 7 Exhibit 4-C, # 8 Exhibit 5, # 9 Text of Proposed Order)(Ku, Brian)

Download PDF
Document # 5 – Objectors’ Chart Name of Objector (Dkt #)1 Name of Counsel 1. Marc and Tammy Doran unrepresented 2. Carl A. Cole unrepresented Notes2 Date of Filing of Objection 5/11/2011 · Home state: Texas · Reason: Chase has done worse things than this 5/23/2011 · Home state: Arizona · Reason: inadequate settlement amount 3. David B. Hibbard unrepresented 4. Kevin Quinlan unrepresented 5/24/2011 · Home state: New York · Reason: unclear 6/14/2011 · Home state: New York · Reason: unclear 5. Shirley Seege Brown unrepresented 6. Helen Wilcox unrepresented 7/7/2011 · Home state: Kentucky · Reason: inadequate settlement amount 8/1/2011 · Home state: New Jersey · Reason: inadequate settlement amount 7. Trevor Grant unrepresented 8/8/2011 · Home state: Texas · Reason: unclear 1 Docket Numbers are provided. If no Docket Number is provided, a copy of the objection is attached hereto. 2 To the extent applicable and known to Class Counsel, “Notes” include objectors’ home state, amount of money objector paid Chase for PPP (provided to us from Chase’s counsel), reasons provided for the objection, and the status of deposition of the objector. 1 8. Cynthia M. Bracken unrepresented 9. Matthew W. Thomas unrepresented 10. Margaret Wheeler unrepresented 11. Carla Victoria Diaz unrepresented 12. Jonathan Marr unrepresented 8/8/2011 · Home state: Florida · Reason: inadequate settlement amount 8/15/2011 · Home state: Pennsylvania · Reasons: inadequate settlement amount, excessive legal fees 8/15/2011 · Home state: Texas · Reasons: class definition, money to class representatives, inadequate settlement amount, no injunctive relief 8/17/2011 · Home state: California · Reason: inadequate settlement amount 8/18/2011 · Home state: Massachusetts · Reason: inadequate settlement amount ($60 Million “should not be out of the question”) 13. Susan Marie Borden unrepresented 14. Daniel and Katie Sibley Thomas Cox (Dallas, TX) (Dkt # 339) 8/18/2011 · Home state: New York · Reasons: definition of “claims,” money to class representatives, counsel fees, no injunctive relief 8/18/2011 · Home state: Texas · Money spent: Objector never paid any money to Chase for PPP · Reasons: Insufficient notice, unfair restrictions on objectors, inadequacy of information about remedy, no sub-classes, excessive fees, class certification issues · Deposition status: deposition being scheduled 2 15. Cindy Barginear Thomas Cox (Dallas, TX) 8/18/2011 · Home state: Texas · Money spent: Objector never paid any money to Chase for PPP (Dkt # 339) · Reasons: Insufficient notice, unfair restrictions on objectors, inadequacy of information about remedy, no sub-classes, excessive fees, class certification issues · Deposition status: deposition being scheduled 16. Victor Capurso unrepresented 8/19/2011 · Home state: New York · Reasons: Settlement amount too low, insufficient notice, excessive fees 17. Clarke Hampe 18. Manijeh Sabi unrepresented lawyer 8/19/2011 unrepresented 8/19/2011 · Home state: Texas · Reasons: no subclasses, poor class notice, Settlement amount too low, excessive attorneys’ fees, class certification issues · Home state: New York · Reason: Settlement amount too low after fees and expenses 19. Douglas Paluczak Matt Weinstein (Miami, FL) 8/19/2011 · Home state: Missouri · PPP Money spent: $.61 paid to Chase by Objector on PPP (Dkt # 354) · Reasons: excessive fees, insufficient settlement amount, no injunctive relief, no subclasses · Deposition status: deposition being scheduled 20. Chris Schulte (Dkt # 354) Matt Weinstein (Miami, FL) 8/19/2011 · Home state: Missouri · PPP Money spent: $6.83 paid to Chase by Objector on PPP · Reasons: excessive fees, insufficient settlement amount, no injunctive relief, no subclasses · Deposition status: deposition being scheduled 3 21. Laura Fortman (Dkt # 354) Matt Weinstein (Miami, FL) 8/19/2011 · Home state: Missouri · PPP Money spent: $5.23 paid to Chase by Objector on PPP · Reasons: excessive fees, insufficient settlement amount, no injunctive relief, no subclasses, · Deposition status: deposition being scheduled 22. Tom Blanchard (Dkt # 352) 23. September Katje (Dkt # 357) 24. William McWhorter (Dkt # 351) Jeff Brown (Boca Raton, FL) and Patrick Sweeney (Madison, WI) 8/19/2011 Jeff Brown (Boca Raton, FL) and Patrick Sweeney (Madison, WI) 8/19/2011 · Home state: Wisconsin · Reasons: inadequate, cumbersome claims administration, attorneys’ fees issues, relief creates conflict in the class, cy pres funds, value to the class, inadequate notice · Deposition status: deposition sought, no response from counsel N. Albert 8/19/2011 Bacharach, Jr. (Gainsville, FL) · Home state: California · Reasons: incomplete settlement agreement, excessive attorneys’ fees, class certification issues, settlement amount · Deposition status: deposition sought, no response from counsel · Home state: Florida. · Reasons: Insufficient notice, unfair settlement amount for claimants and excessive fees · Deposition status: deposition being scheduled 4 y. /8 -/-tU& i,~ ~ ~91( /7J ~ KN&',/ vII L-LI l)l/ri o íÀI/l/l _ P LLC ~ :/ ~! ~~~.!~'J J(9 f\t~T)-M\l f/L/J-rz, -1- kvv A rnf:l'Yt&'l- oF: . , _5~lIc'1,,IJ- P/d-fL15 Or~ -rJ.-l,(,S:-- 5(~--r: ,,),¡ ~/-~ ~/ C tAi-. rYl Y (( &JLvLl f5(\/-- V L ~ t r '- L (,,C'- '/l e, V'\L t -YJ-t7 S7c IV lVLG-k y- C- L--/t-.5" _L Ì!i 5 H l"õ ¿:' '-, ~-. FUf'V / VVM ( C rl IS VVry to l--Òi/t//Â)\Lt) S HeJ--ULb 13e R&-- I / t / vA S oS ê"S- Ev 1"3 ( TH:F' CO v'f2 1/ 7ø A- e L~S 0 AI ~¿-5 eC: ¡i~( 0 U f\ 1; B ¥, c. V (tt'4~ G 5 cil N. D A- i. s: ;J:; p V'' '- l/~i &N7 6 t -- L~ L-¡fL H S C&5 ~_3 GP T~~ LL(ibÆ~N/ T~c7 5C-"-'L'\-/VLC7N'G.AIXÒ ,Ah--l?llc r=-- )-uVA-fl / G (-oUL1 C3 Ò' C O'-&1'L~ W( iH lif\ ¡Lvf1 (j c. /\(l M l &- G~NC)cJ GH-/ /0 B~ ~(\dn Cl fi- lò )-LL-/ 5/r'j!'Ú(J¡ O'0c; (5¡lt!,OG 5 ft-7 j/YtC-W &N DO L-L-JH5/ 5 rt()UL- /Yvo y- Be:': (j(fi- ot= LH~ (J( u~s Liel'Í/ CON Sl l/dKc l\G -77-/t:;-' ,£ LC6 (;61 Z)c;f::::;(::~-NPÄ-f\'rs'/' ¡L t'iQ G C/ i C-l/ () IL (j 'f ,,~ () c en¥" c~ l N P R Ii c Tl S i f ~ 0 8 T¿~ vi C f1e. s t9 F- c ~ lJ (Z ¡t cTj f? d-¿Ci7J C~5 ct: I ELf P L,2"9 Co Y c: iÌ AN, G; V? D L--t:l c ù ri5 o l~ TJ+6~ UiN t-J- (è/ Å/v.'D t)(.:~t?P lì '-¿- )' C-ß/ )t'-á\Ll) PRIJ- C Îl ce7 c--¡\ i-u-c5/ ¡)~ v¡! rz ('ouS. s.~, (;s.. -r 11 N. Co 'lo C o¡. 5 "lJNTi- y/-, CHAt'l CoE T~ Cir¿cui0(5~(\cè3 J B 7 Pko/'0 wrr-HOU ( Dt)C:;L-o.sII\l(O Te-YJ5) PrCL tJll to bN, rzOCLn'7EN-r eJ\ S L /I.(¡ t.V\U)Vfš .s T.f~'7 / rkn'-/ j.1\LC) -s Ut--:Ji'G/ jN.t) eGA( Fusi 6N/...5 ìo Vvri/J-r wA- fèCAL'-j Cô(! t/\l(p C9N, 5(LX¿1C;fl"/J\LG ~¿: L-/tc.s,/ /ik Q v Sf (\Co L-C)" P t-O l-ë' / TO 'Tl6'c R 6 0-'Nt:r7~ -roULL,y D l S ~~0Idè -I.N 0 ¡-f- ~ C ¡J62 D ~ ¡H.-' l;(.Jf i (. t-~- C ù U ,725 c: / CJ- ¡i 5 c: WI LL D-~N 7' iK (,5 c- 1- L-L EG iA'T Cf' 5/ 13 v- i: TJ- e¡ s i- à (ju: h 0 ¡- 13 c-- ,4 L L OV~ 10, G e(-,)- W ¡d t W (;r¿: (1;;i J \l ~ 5 J. c) U Lb P.? e- 5 C~\ù:;'?;(2 l.ì RG~p q'2.c;rn1 ,jl~Dei / -rK j l\i1ìc) LCD l ~'l0 r r"" S (/ eN /3 c~r+A-V i 0f( 1'o ~ Æ N b I ~'- IrH:;- PU'l-ct: N ,- ,(' , Û l' vt . ~¡ Ä- VY ~J,.j 0L D CA-s 1:. lI (fM 0 en 0 P TrH S L-IUl ¡J It 1 S. "K;Rt)(, N. C '" 'V?J' 0 C ¡.'l 5 ~ k/ /' ()-C y-- ~ --'3¿- 5, L~" t=-L-A; ) t;,/R.c"'S'5 15.1 ,15'lJ (;-,  Î' (\A- (nAN l'liAl2, rv't r-l-L NÄVC: )~C U!:(èL~r V' ) 'P rY Q rt (, A1'L Cf-f:A-St; -4 C ò. ' d-' C I 'i 0" , j /- u) , c~ 6 s rn l r rf ':-rf2-'t jLrl \ ~ :L Q v i l\( C r) yy1 v4 0;; Co e¡ N. UI4.(?~(l l;-¡f1 A rP~/trc.Yf ON IHt-- LtA!3csL- 0 f~ IK(.:: r.J() S'\: C/J-IC() t 5 : /Jf?(-è) vv t3-AR- CDDL; j Z wT Z G t~ ;¿J-Q NUl'18~1L '5 ; '/3& 1 P 3 If..~l 50 N,r; t:-o ¡¿ 0 ED (:-c,'l l (I '7 t;' '\"i ¡4ß Q\tc: : 51~NA-rI)¡zfÇ ;' ~~~ ¿;?~ c'

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?