Kardonick v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
Filing
367
MOTION PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND PLAN OF ALLOCATION by David Kardonick. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 4-A, # 6 Exhibit 4-B, # 7 Exhibit 4-C, # 8 Exhibit 5, # 9 Text of Proposed Order)(Ku, Brian)
Document # 5 – Objectors’ Chart
Name of Objector
(Dkt #)1
Name of
Counsel
1. Marc and
Tammy Doran
unrepresented
2. Carl A. Cole
unrepresented
Notes2
Date of
Filing of
Objection
5/11/2011
· Home state: Texas
· Reason: Chase has done worse things than this
5/23/2011
· Home state: Arizona
· Reason: inadequate settlement amount
3. David B.
Hibbard
unrepresented
4. Kevin Quinlan
unrepresented
5/24/2011
· Home state: New York
· Reason: unclear
6/14/2011
· Home state: New York
· Reason: unclear
5. Shirley Seege
Brown
unrepresented
6. Helen Wilcox
unrepresented
7/7/2011
· Home state: Kentucky
· Reason: inadequate settlement amount
8/1/2011
· Home state: New Jersey
· Reason: inadequate settlement amount
7. Trevor Grant
unrepresented
8/8/2011
· Home state: Texas
· Reason: unclear
1
Docket Numbers are provided. If no Docket Number is provided, a copy of the objection is attached hereto.
2
To the extent applicable and known to Class Counsel, “Notes” include objectors’ home state, amount of money objector paid Chase
for PPP (provided to us from Chase’s counsel), reasons provided for the objection, and the status of deposition of the objector.
1
8. Cynthia M.
Bracken
unrepresented
9. Matthew W.
Thomas
unrepresented
10. Margaret
Wheeler
unrepresented
11. Carla Victoria
Diaz
unrepresented
12. Jonathan Marr
unrepresented
8/8/2011
· Home state: Florida
· Reason: inadequate settlement amount
8/15/2011
· Home state: Pennsylvania
· Reasons: inadequate settlement amount, excessive legal fees
8/15/2011
· Home state: Texas
· Reasons: class definition, money to class representatives, inadequate
settlement amount, no injunctive relief
8/17/2011
· Home state: California
· Reason: inadequate settlement amount
8/18/2011
· Home state: Massachusetts
· Reason: inadequate settlement amount ($60 Million “should not be out of
the question”)
13. Susan Marie
Borden
unrepresented
14. Daniel and
Katie Sibley
Thomas Cox
(Dallas, TX)
(Dkt # 339)
8/18/2011
· Home state: New York
· Reasons: definition of “claims,” money to class representatives, counsel
fees, no injunctive relief
8/18/2011
· Home state: Texas
· Money spent: Objector never paid any money to Chase for PPP
· Reasons: Insufficient notice, unfair restrictions on objectors, inadequacy of
information about remedy, no sub-classes, excessive fees, class certification
issues
· Deposition status: deposition being scheduled
2
15. Cindy
Barginear
Thomas Cox
(Dallas, TX)
8/18/2011
· Home state: Texas
· Money spent: Objector never paid any money to Chase for PPP
(Dkt # 339)
· Reasons: Insufficient notice, unfair restrictions on objectors, inadequacy of
information about remedy, no sub-classes, excessive fees, class certification
issues
· Deposition status: deposition being scheduled
16. Victor Capurso
unrepresented
8/19/2011
· Home state: New York
· Reasons: Settlement amount too low, insufficient notice, excessive fees
17. Clarke Hampe
18. Manijeh Sabi
unrepresented
lawyer
8/19/2011
unrepresented
8/19/2011
· Home state: Texas
· Reasons: no subclasses, poor class notice, Settlement amount too low,
excessive attorneys’ fees, class certification issues
· Home state: New York
· Reason: Settlement amount too low after fees and expenses
19. Douglas
Paluczak
Matt Weinstein
(Miami, FL)
8/19/2011
· Home state: Missouri
· PPP Money spent: $.61 paid to Chase by Objector on PPP
(Dkt # 354)
· Reasons: excessive fees, insufficient settlement amount, no injunctive
relief, no subclasses
· Deposition status: deposition being scheduled
20. Chris Schulte
(Dkt # 354)
Matt Weinstein
(Miami, FL)
8/19/2011
· Home state: Missouri
· PPP Money spent: $6.83 paid to Chase by Objector on PPP
· Reasons: excessive fees, insufficient settlement amount, no injunctive
relief, no subclasses
· Deposition status: deposition being scheduled
3
21. Laura Fortman
(Dkt # 354)
Matt Weinstein
(Miami, FL)
8/19/2011
· Home state: Missouri
· PPP Money spent: $5.23 paid to Chase by Objector on PPP
· Reasons: excessive fees, insufficient settlement amount, no injunctive
relief, no subclasses,
· Deposition status: deposition being scheduled
22. Tom Blanchard
(Dkt # 352)
23. September Katje
(Dkt # 357)
24. William
McWhorter
(Dkt # 351)
Jeff Brown
(Boca Raton,
FL) and Patrick
Sweeney
(Madison, WI)
8/19/2011
Jeff Brown
(Boca Raton,
FL) and Patrick
Sweeney
(Madison, WI)
8/19/2011
· Home state: Wisconsin
· Reasons: inadequate, cumbersome claims administration, attorneys’ fees
issues, relief creates conflict in the class, cy pres funds, value to the class,
inadequate notice
· Deposition status: deposition sought, no response from counsel
N. Albert
8/19/2011
Bacharach, Jr.
(Gainsville, FL)
· Home state: California
· Reasons: incomplete settlement agreement, excessive attorneys’ fees, class
certification issues, settlement amount
· Deposition status: deposition sought, no response from counsel
· Home state: Florida.
· Reasons: Insufficient notice, unfair settlement amount for claimants and
excessive fees
· Deposition status: deposition being scheduled
4
y. /8
-/-tU& i,~ ~ ~91(
/7J ~
KN&',/ vII L-LI l)l/ri
o
íÀI/l/l _ P LLC ~
:/
~! ~~~.!~'J J(9 f\t~T)-M\l f/L/J-rz, -1- kvv A rnf:l'Yt&'l- oF:
. , _5~lIc'1,,IJ- P/d-fL15 Or~ -rJ.-l,(,S:-- 5(~--r: ,,),¡ ~/-~ ~/ C tAi-. rYl Y
(( &JLvLl f5(\/--
V L ~ t r '- L (,,C'- '/l e, V'\L t
-YJ-t7 S7c IV lVLG-k y- C- L--/t-.5" _L Ì!i 5 H l"õ ¿:' '-, ~-.
FUf'V / VVM ( C rl IS VVry to l--Òi/t//Â)\Lt) S HeJ--ULb 13e R&--
I / t /
vA S oS ê"S- Ev 1"3 ( TH:F' CO v'f2 1/ 7ø A- e L~S 0 AI ~¿-5 eC: ¡i~( 0 U f\ 1;
B ¥, c. V (tt'4~ G 5 cil N. D A- i. s: ;J:; p V'' '- l/~i &N7 6 t -- L~ L-¡fL H S
C&5 ~_3 GP T~~ LL(ibÆ~N/ T~c7 5C-"-'L'\-/VLC7N'G.AIXÒ ,Ah--l?llc
r=-- )-uVA-fl / G (-oUL1 C3 Ò' C O'-&1'L~ W( iH lif\ ¡Lvf1 (j c. /\(l
M l &- G~NC)cJ GH-/ /0 B~ ~(\dn Cl fi- lò )-LL-/ 5/r'j!'Ú(J¡ O'0c; (5¡lt!,OG
5 ft-7 j/YtC-W &N DO L-L-JH5/ 5 rt()UL- /Yvo y- Be:': (j(fi- ot= LH~
(J( u~s Liel'Í/ CON Sl l/dKc l\G -77-/t:;-' ,£ LC6 (;61 Z)c;f::::;(::~-NPÄ-f\'rs'/'
¡L t'iQ G C/ i C-l/ () IL (j 'f ,,~ () c en¥" c~ l N P R Ii c Tl S i f ~ 0 8 T¿~ vi C f1e. s
t9 F- c ~ lJ (Z ¡t cTj f? d-¿Ci7J C~5 ct: I ELf P L,2"9 Co Y c: iÌ AN, G; V? D L--t:l c ù ri5
o l~ TJ+6~ UiN t-J- (è/ Å/v.'D t)(.:~t?P lì '-¿- )' C-ß/ )t'-á\Ll) PRIJ- C Îl ce7 c--¡\ i-u-c5/ ¡)~ v¡! rz ('ouS. s.~, (;s.. -r 11 N. Co 'lo C o¡. 5 "lJNTi- y/-,
CHAt'l CoE T~ Cir¿cui0(5~(\cè3 J B 7 Pko/'0 wrr-HOU (
Dt)C:;L-o.sII\l(O Te-YJ5) PrCL tJll to bN, rzOCLn'7EN-r eJ\ S L /I.(¡ t.V\U)Vfš
.s T.f~'7 / rkn'-/ j.1\LC) -s Ut--:Ji'G/ jN.t) eGA( Fusi 6N/...5 ìo
Vvri/J-r wA- fèCAL'-j Cô(! t/\l(p C9N, 5(LX¿1C;fl"/J\LG ~¿: L-/tc.s,/
/ik Q v Sf (\Co L-C)" P t-O l-ë' / TO 'Tl6'c R 6 0-'Nt:r7~ -roULL,y D l S ~~0Idè
-I.N 0 ¡-f- ~ C ¡J62 D ~ ¡H.-' l;(.Jf i (. t-~- C ù U ,725 c: / CJ- ¡i 5 c: WI LL D-~N 7'
iK (,5 c- 1- L-L EG iA'T Cf' 5/ 13 v- i: TJ- e¡ s i- à (ju: h 0 ¡- 13 c-- ,4 L L OV~
10, G e(-,)- W ¡d t W (;r¿: (1;;i J \l ~ 5 J. c) U Lb P.? e- 5 C~\ù:;'?;(2 l.ì
RG~p q'2.c;rn1 ,jl~Dei / -rK j l\i1ìc) LCD l ~'l0 r r"" S (/ eN /3 c~r+A-V i 0f( 1'o ~
Æ N b I ~'- IrH:;- PU'l-ct: N ,- ,(' , Û l' vt .
~¡ Ä- VY ~J,.j 0L D CA-s 1:. lI (fM 0 en 0 P TrH S L-IUl ¡J It 1 S. "K;Rt)(, N. C '" 'V?J' 0
C ¡.'l 5 ~ k/ /' ()-C y-- ~ --'3¿- 5, L~" t=-L-A;
) t;,/R.c"'S'5 15.1 ,15'lJ (;-,
 Î' (\A- (nAN l'liAl2,
rv't r-l-L NÄVC: )~C U!:(èL~r V'
) 'P rY Q rt (, A1'L Cf-f:A-St; -4 C ò. ' d-' C I 'i 0" , j /- u) ,
c~ 6 s rn l r rf ':-rf2-'t jLrl \ ~ :L Q v i l\( C r) yy1 v4 0;; Co e¡
N. UI4.(?~(l l;-¡f1 A rP~/trc.Yf ON IHt-- LtA!3csL- 0 f~ IK(.:: r.J() S'\: C/J-IC() t 5 :
/Jf?(-è) vv t3-AR- CDDL; j Z wT Z G t~ ;¿J-Q NUl'18~1L '5 ; '/3& 1 P 3
If..~l 50 N,r; t:-o ¡¿ 0 ED (:-c,'l l (I '7 t;' '\"i ¡4ß Q\tc: :
51~NA-rI)¡zfÇ ;' ~~~ ¿;?~
c'
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?