Kardonick v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al

Filing 56

MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages , An Omnibus Reply and A Three-Day Extension To File The Omnibus Reply Brief by George Cleaver, David Lundy, Warren Prince, Harold Smith, Trudy Smith, Ennis White. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dominguez, Manuel)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. 1:10-cv-23235/HOEVELER DAVID KARDONICK, JOHN DAVID, and MICHAEL CLEMINS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and the general public, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. and CHASE BANK USA, N.A. Defendants. ORDER GRANTING INTERVENORS' MOTION TO FILE OMNIBUS REPLY BRIEF IN EXCESS OF TEN PAGES AND FOR THREE-DAY EXTENSION TO FILE OMNIBUS REPLY BRIEF THIS CAUSE, having come before the Court upon Intervenors' unopposed motion to file an omnibus reply memorandum in excess of ten pages in response to the opposition to the motion to intervene and to extend time to file an omnibus reply brief by three days, and the Court being fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that said motion is GRANTED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this ____day April of, 2011. ____________________________________ WILLIAM M. HOEVELER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Copies furnished to: All Counsel of Record.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?