Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
118
NOTICE by Apple, Inc. of Page 21 of its Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Attachments: # 1 Supplement In Color Page 21 of Responsive Brief)(Pace, Christopher)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 1:10-CV-23580-UU
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
APPLE INC.,
Defendant.
APPLE INC.,
Counterclaim-Plaintiff,
v.
MOTOROLA, INC. and
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,
Counterclaim-Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIM-PLAINTIFF APPLE
INC.’S NOTICE OF FILING IN COLOR PAGE 21 OF ITS
RESPONSIVE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF
US_ACTIVE:\43811415\01\99910.0590
On August 18, 2011, Apple Inc. submitted its Responsive Claim Construction Brief
(“Brief”) under seal pursuant to the Court’s March 23, 2011 Protective Order. Page 21 of that
Brief contained two diagrams in color, but the as-submitted version of the Brief was solely in
black-and-white. Attached hereto is an in-color version of page 21 of the Brief. Because page
21 of the Brief does not contain confidential, proprietary information of either Apple or Motorola
Mobility, Inc., it is not being filed here under seal.
Dated: September 22, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Christopher R.J. Pace
Christopher R. J. Pace
christopher.pace@weil.com
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1200
Miami, FL 33131
Telephone: (305) 577-3100
Facsimile: (305) 374-7159
Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc.
Of Counsel:
Mark G. Davis
mark.davis@weil.com
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
1300 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: (202) 682-7000
Facsimile: (202) 857-0940
Jill J. Ho
jill.ho@weil.com
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 802-3000
Facsimile: (650) 802-3100
US_ACTIVE:\43811415\01\99910.0590
2
Matthew D. Powers
matthew.powers@tensegritylawgroup.com
Steven S. Cherensky
steven.cherensky@tensegritylawgroup.com
Tensegrity Law Group LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 401
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Tel: (650) 802-6000
Robert T. Haslam (CA Bar No. 71134)
rhaslam@cov.com
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700
Redwood Shores, CA 94065-1418
Telephone: (650) 632-4700
Facsimile: (650) 632-4800
Robert D. Fram (CA Bar No. 126750)
rfram@cov.com
Christine Saunders Haskett (CA Bar No. 188053)
chaskett@cov.com
Samuel F. Ernst (CA Bar No. 223963)
sernst@cov.com
Winslow B. Taub (CA Bar No. 233456)
wtaub@cov.com
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
One Front Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5356
Telephone: (415) 591-6000
Facsimile: (415) 591-6091
US_ACTIVE:\43811415\01\99910.0590
3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on September 22, 2011, I filed the foregoing document with the
Clerk of the Court. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all
counsel of record identified on the attached Service List via CM/ECF and email.
/s/ Christopher R. J. Pace
Christopher R.J. Pace (Fla. Bar No. 0721166)
US_ACTIVE:\43811415\01\99910.0590
4
SERVICE LIST
Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-UU
Edward M. Mullins
Fla. Bar No. 863920
emullins@astidavis.com
ASTIGARRAGA DAVIS MULLINS & GROSSMAN, P.A.
701 Brickell Avenue, 16th Floor
Miami, FL 33131
Telephone: (305) 372-8282
Facsimile: (305) 372-8202
Attorneys for Motorola Mobility, Inc.
Electronically served via CM/ECF and email
Of Counsel:
Charles K. Verhoeven
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 93111
(415) 875-6600
Edward J. DeFranco
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, NY 10010
(212) 849-7000
David A. Nelson
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
500 West Madison Street, Suite 2450
Chicago, IL 60661
(312) 705-7400
Moto-Apple-SDFL@quinnemanuel.com
Attorneys for Motorola Mobility, Inc.
Electronically served via CM/ECF and email
US_ACTIVE:\43811415\01\99910.0590
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?