Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 225

MOTION to Compel Responses to Interrogatories Nos. 7 and 12 Regarding Products Embodying Motorola's Asserted Patents and Accompanying Memorandum of Law in Support by Apple, Inc.. Responses due by 2/16/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Elena Dimuzio, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13, # 15 Exhibit 14, # 16 Exhibit 15, # 17 Exhibit 16, # 18 Exhibit 17, # 19 Text of Proposed Order)(Pace, Christopher)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-RNS-TEB

MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

APPLE INC.,
Defendant.

APPLE INC.,
Counterclaim Plaintiff,
v.
MOTOROLA, INC. and
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,
Counterclaim Defendants.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF
APPLE INC.’S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO APPLE’S
INTERROGATORIES NOS. 7 AND 12

Based on the arguments made in the parties’ filings and oral argument (if any), the Court
finds that Apple’s Interrogatories Numbers 7 and 12 seek relevant information which Apple is
entitled to discover. The Court therefore GRANTS Apple’s Motion to Compel Responses to
Apple’s Interrogatories Numbers 7 and 12. Accordingly, Motorola is hereby ORDERED to
supplement its responses to respond fully to these Interrogatories. Motorola shall provide its
supplemental responses within one week of the date of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date

Hon. Ted E. Bandstra
United States Magistrate Judge

1