Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 244

Plaintiff's MOTION to Bring Electronic Equipment Into Courtroom for Use During March 8, 2012 Tutorial Hearing by Motorola Mobility, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Proposed Order)(Mullins, Edward)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 1:10-CV-23580-RNS
______________________________________
)
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
APPLE, INC.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
______________________________________ )
)
APPLE, INC.,
)
)
Counterclaim-Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MOTOROLA, INC. and
)
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,
)
)
Counterclaim-Defendants.
)
)
______________________________________ )
MOTION TO BRING EQUIPMENT INTO COURTROOM
FOR USE DURING THE MARCH 8, 2012 TUTORIAL HEARING
Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“Motorola”) respectfully
moves this Court for entry of an order permitting counsel to bring into Court certain computer
and technological devices for use during the Technology Tutorial Hearing scheduled for March
8, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. per this Court’s February 9, 2012 Order [DE234] (“Hearing”). In support
of the instant motion, Motorola states:
1.

Motorola intends to conduct presentations at the March 8, 2012 Hearing that rely

on the use of computer technology and other technological equipment. To accomplish these

CASE NO.: 1:10-CV-23580-RNS

objectives, Motorola will require several laptop computers and their external drives, 6 flash
drives, and additional audio/video presentation equipment, consisting of: cables, power strips,
extension cords, presentation clickers and laser pointers. Motorola’s presentations may also
include certain demonstrative devices, including: a Neonode N1 and/or N2 mobile phone, an
exemplary Motorola set top box, and a number of exemplary Motorola and Apple cell phones
and tablet computers.
2.

Motorola understands that the aforementioned items will be subject to

examination for security purposes as are all other materials brought into the courthouse.
3.

Motorola also requests that it be allowed two (2) hours on March 7, 2012 between

2:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. (or any other time convenient for the Court) to check and set this
equipment up in the courtroom for use during the Hearing.
CONCLUSION
WHEREFORE Motorola respectfully requests that this Court enter an order granting
this motion for leave to bring the aforementioned equipmetn into the courtroom for use during
the March 8, 2012 Hearing and for leave to set up its equipment on March 7, 2012 between 2:00
p.m. and 5:00 p.m. (or any other time convenient for the Court). A proposed order is attached
hereto as Exhibit “A.”
Dated: February 24, 2012

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Edward M. Mullins
Edward M. Mullins (Fla. Bar No. 863920)
[e-mail]
ASTIGARRAGA DAVIS MULLINS & GROSSMAN, P.A.
701 Brickell Avenue, 16th Floor
Miami, Florida 33131
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

2

CASE NO.: 1:10-CV-23580-RNS

Charles K. Verhoeven*
[e-mail]
David A. Perlson*
[e-mail]
Cathleen G. Garrigan*
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]
Edward J. DeFranco*
[e-mail]
Raymond N. Nimrod*
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, New York 10010
Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]
David A. Nelson*
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
500 West Madison Street, Suite 2450
Chicago, Illinois 60661
Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]
Marshall S. Searcy, III*
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017-2543
Tel.: [phone]
*Admitted pro hac vice
Counsel for Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant Motorola
Solutions, Inc. and Motorola Mobility, Inc.

3

CASE NO.: 1:10-CV-23580-RNS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on February 24, 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing
document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF filing system. I also certify that the
foregoing document is being served this date on all counsel of record or pro se parties on the
Service List below in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic
Filing generated by the CM/ECF system or; in some other authorized manner for those counsel
or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
/s/ Edward M. Mullins___________________
Edward M. Mullins (Fla. Bar No. 863920)

SERVICE LIST
Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
Case No.: 1:10-CV-23580-RNS
United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Samuel F. Ernst*
[e-mail]
Christine Saunders Haskett*
[e-mail]
Robert D. Fram*
[e-mail]
Chris Martiniak*
[e-mail]
Winslow B. Taub*
[e-mail]
R. Anthony Lopez*
[e-mail]
Covington & Burling LLP
One Front Street
San Francisco, California 94111-5356
Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]

Christopher R.J. Pace
[e-mail]
Edward Soto
[e-mail]
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1200
Miami, Florida 33131
Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]

Nathan A. Greenblatt*
[e-mail]
Jill J. Ho*
[e-mail]
Jacqueline T. Harlow*
[e-mail]
Anne M. Cappella*
[e-mail]
Brian C. Chang*
[e-mail]
Arjun Mehra*
[e-mail]
Jeremy Jason Lang*
[e-mail]
Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, California 94065-1134
Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]

Robert T. Haslam*
[e-mail]
Anupam Sharma*
[e-mail]
Covington & Burling LLP
333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]

4

CASE NO.: 1:10-CV-23580-RNS

Matthew D. Powers*
[e-mail]
Steven S. Cherensky*
[e-mail]
Azra Hadzimehmedovic
[e-mail]
Tensegrity Law Group LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 401
Redwood Shores, California
Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]

Jenny C. Wu*
[e-mail]
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
767 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10153
Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]

Mark G. Davis*
[e-mail]
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
1300 Eye Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005
Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]
*Admitted pro hac vice
Counsel for Defendant
Electronically served via CM/ECF

5