Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
264
Joint MOTION for Summary Judgment Regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 6,282,646 and 7,380,116 by Apple, Inc.. Responses due by 4/2/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Summary Judgment re 646 and 116 Patents)(Pace, Christopher)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-RNS-TEB
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,
Plaintiff,
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
v.
APPLE INC.,
Defendant.
APPLE INC.,
Counterclaim Plaintiff,
v.
MOTOROLA, INC. and
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,
Counterclaim Defendants.
JOINT MOTION REGARDING U.S. PATENT NOS. 6,282,646 AND 7,380,116
Apple Inc. (“Apple”), by and through counsel, and Motorola Solutions,
Inc. (f/k/a Motorola, Inc.) and Motorola Mobility, Inc. (collectively, “Motorola”), by and
through counsel, hereby move for the entry of summary judgment of non-infringement of
U.S. Patent Nos. 6,282,646 (“the ’646 patent”) and 7,380,116 (“the ’116 patent”) based
on the rulings in the Court’s Claim Construction Order of December 1, 2011 (“Markman
Order”). Apple acknowledges that the Court’s constructions in the Markman Order of
terms from the ’646 and ’116 patents were case-dispositive as to Apple’s causes of action
based on the ’646 and ’116 patents because, given those constructions, Apple cannot
establish that Motorola infringed the asserted claims in the ’646 and ’116 patents. This
1
joint motion is made subject to Apple’s reservation of all rights to appeal the Court’s
claim constructions with respect to the ’646 and ’116 patents.
Motorola agrees that its corresponding counterclaims seeking declaratory
judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of the ’646 and ’116 patents should be
dismissed without prejudice. This stipulation of dismissal without prejudice is made
subject to Motorola’s reservation of rights to reassert these or other counterclaims and
defenses relating to the asserted patents should Apple’s infringement claims regarding the
’646 and ’116 patents be revived or reasserted for any reason (including, but not limited
to, modification of the Court’s claim constructions on appeal resulting in a remand to the
district court.)
Nothing in this stipulation shall preclude Motorola from appealing any
ruling that it could otherwise have appealed had this stipulation not been entered.
Furthermore, nothing in this stipulation precludes either party from
moving for summary judgment with respect to any issue remaining before this Court.
Dated: March 14, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Edward M. Mullins
Edward M. Mullins
emullins@astidavis.com
Hal M. Lucas
hlucas@astidavis.com
Astigarrage Davis Mullins & Grossman,
P.A.
701 Brickell Avenue, 16th Floor
Miami, FL 33131
Telephone: (305) 372-8282
Facsimile: (305) 372-8202
/s/ Christopher R. J. Pace
Christopher R. J. Pace
christopher.pace@weil.com
Edward Soto
edward.soto@weil.com
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1200
Miami, FL 33131
Telephone: (305) 577-3100
Facsimile: (305) 374-7159
Attorneys for Motorola Mobility, Inc.
and Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Attorneys for Apple Inc.
2
Of Counsel:
Mark D. Baker
markbaker@quinnemanuel.com
Edward J. DeFranco
eddefranco@quinnemanuel.com
Alexander Rudis
alexanderrudis@quinnemanuel.com
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, New York 10010
Telephone: (212) 849-7000
Facsimile: (212) 849-7100
Of Counsel:
Matthew D. Powers
Matthew.Powers@tensegritylawgroup.com
Steven Cherensky
Steven.Cherensky@tensegritylawgroup.com
Tensegrity Law Group LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: 650-802-6000
Facsimile: 650-802-6001
Mark G. Davis
mark.davis@weil.com
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
1300 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: (202) 682-7000
Facsimile: (202) 857-0940
Charles K. Verhoeven
charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
David A. Perlson
davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
Robert T. Haslam
rhaslam@cov.com
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 632-4700
Facsimile: (650) 632-4800
David A. Nelson
davenelson@quinnemanuel.com
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
500 West Madison Street, Suite 2450
Chicago, IL 60661
Telephone: (312) 705-7400
Facsimile: (312) 705-7401
Attorneys for Motorola Mobility, Inc. and
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Robert D. Fram
rfram@cov.com
Christine Saunders Haskett
chaskett@cov.com
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
One Front Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 591-6000
Facsimile: (415) 591-6091
Attorneys for Apple Inc.
3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on March 14, 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing
document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing
document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on
the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of
Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those
counsel or parties who are not authorized to received electronically Notices of Electronic
Filing.
/s/ Christopher R. J. Pace
Christopher R. J. Pace (Fla. Bar No. 0721166)
4
SERVICE LIST
Motorola Mobility, Inc. versus Apple Inc.
Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-RNS
United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Edward M. Mullins
Fla. Bar No. 863920
emullins@astidavis.com
ASTIGARRAGA DAVIS MULLINS & GROSSMAN, P.A.
701 Brickell Avenue, 16th Floor
Miami, FL 33131
Telephone: (305) 372-8282
Facsimile: (305) 372-8202
Of Counsel:
Charles K. Verhoeven
David A. Perlson
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 93111
(415) 875-6600
Raymond N. Nimrod
Edward J. DeFranco
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, NY 10010
(212) 849-7000
David A. Nelson
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
500 West Madison Street, Suite 2450
Chicago, IL 60661
(312) 705-7400
Moto-Apple-SDFL@quinnemanuel.com
Attorneys for Motorola Mobility, Inc. and Motorola, Inc.
Electronically served via email
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?