Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 276

NOTICE by Apple, Inc. of Filing Declaration of Jill J. Ho in Support of Apple Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer and Exhibits Thereto (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Jill J. Ho in Support of Apple Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S)(Pace, Christopher)

EXHIBIT C

Schmidt, Jill
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Schmidt, Jill
Monday, March 12, 2012 8:44 PM
'Cathleen Garrigan'; Moto-Apple-SDFL
Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External; [e-mail]
RE: Apple/Motorola (FL): motion for leave to file amended answer
REDLINE Amended Answer.pdf

Counsel, 

Please see the attached redline. 

Best regards, 
Jill 

From: Cathleen Garrigan [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 5:50 PM
To: Schmidt, Jill; Moto-Apple-SDFL
Cc: Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Apple/Motorola (FL): motion for leave to file amended answer

Jill,  

It is not clear to us what you are referring to.  Please send us a redline.   

Best, 
Cathleen 

From: Schmidt, Jill [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 1:53 PM
To: Cathleen Garrigan; Moto-Apple-SDFL
Cc: Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Apple/Motorola (FL): motion for leave to file amended answer

Hi Cathleen, 

The language we intend to use for our amended answer will be identical to the language used in our answer to 
Motorola's complaint in the second FL action, which was filed earlier today.   

Best regards, 
Jill 

From: Cathleen Garrigan [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 12:15 PM
To: Schmidt, Jill; Moto-Apple-SDFL
Cc: Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Apple/Motorola (FL): motion for leave to file amended answer 

Jill, 
1

In order to evaluate Apple’s request, we will need to see Apple’s proposed amended answer.  Additionally, our team is 
traveling today so it will not be possible for us to review the proposed amended answer by the close of business today. 

Best, 
Cathleen 

From: Schmidt, Jill [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 9:53 AM
To: Cathleen Garrigan; Moto-Apple-SDFL
Cc: Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External; [e-mail]
Subject: Apple/Motorola (FL): motion for leave to file amended answer 

Hi Cathleen, 

As we discussed the other day, Apple is contemplating amending its answer to provide more specific details regarding its 
indirect infringement theories.  Please let me know by COB today whether Motorola will oppose our motion for leave to 
file an amended pleading. 

Best regards, 
Jill 

Jill Schmidt (née Ho)

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065-1134
[e-mail]
[phone] Direct
[phone] Fax 

The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by email, [e-mail],
and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

2