Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Hotfile Corp. et al

Filing 108

Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel RESPONSES TO SUBPOENA TO THIRD PARTY LEMURIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. by Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Disney Enterprises, Inc., Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Universal City Studios Productions LLLP, Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.. Responses due by 8/22/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order PROPOSED ORDER)(Stetson, Karen)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 11-20427-JORDAN DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP, COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., and WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC., Plaintiffs, v. HOTFILE CORP., ANTON TITOV, and DOES 1-10. Defendants. / [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO SUBPOENA TO THIRD PARTY LEMURIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Responses to Subpoena to Third Party Lemuria Communications, Inc. (“Lemuria”), and all of the papers submitted in support thereof, Plaintiffs’ request to compel responses is GRANTED. The Court finds that Lemuria should be ordered to produce responses to Requests Nos. 1(a), (b), and (d), 2(d) and (e), 4, 9, and 11 as requested in plaintiffs’ motion, as follows. It is hereby ORDERED that Lemuria shall produce: a. All documents pertaining to Lemuria’s relationship with the website accessible at www.hotfile.com (“Hotfile”) as requested in Plaintiffs’ Request No. 1, not limited to documents related to Lemuria’s provision of hosting services to Hotfile, and including (1) all documents pertaining to communications with Defendants or any “Hotfile Entity” (defined to include Hotfile Corp., Hotfile, Ltd., or any other entity involved in the operation of Hotfile), (2) all documents pertaining to Lemuria’s role in operating Hotfile, and (3) all documents pertaining to any contracts, agreements, undertakings, or understandings pertaining to Defendants or Hotfile; b. All documents pertaining to Lemuria’s relationship with any Hotfile Entity as requested in Plaintiffs’ Request No. 2, not limited to Lemuria’s provision of hosting services to Hotfile, and including (1) all documents pertaining to any agreements, contracts, undertakings, or understandings between Lemuria and any Hotfile Entity and (2) all documents pertaining to any and all financial arrangements, revenue sharing, and accountings between Lemuria and any Hotfile Entity, including any revenue, income, funds, or other valuable consideration exchanged between Lemuria and any Hotfile Entity; c. Documents sufficient to show each service Lemuria provides to any person other than Defendants or any Hotfile Entity, in response to Plaintiffs’ Request No. 4; d. All documents pertaining to meetings of Lemuria’s board of directors or other governing body as requested in Plaintiffs’ Request No. 9, not limited to Lemuria’s provision of hosting services to Hotfile, and including documents sufficient to show (1) the name and title of every individual attending each meeting; (2) the agenda for each meeting; (3) the date and time of each meeting; (4) the place of each meeting; and (5) all minutes or any notes pertaining to each meeting; and e. Documents sufficient to show all income received by Lemuria, directly or indirectly, in connection with Hotfile, Defendants, or any Hotfile Entity, in response to Plaintiffs’ Request No. 11. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated _____________, 2011. ______________________________ United States District Court Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?