Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Hotfile Corp. et al

Filing 198

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES SET FORTH IN THE COURT'S SCHEDULING ORDER (DE 133) AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (DE 157) re 157 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, 133 Scheduling Order, Order Referring Case to Mediation, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge,,,,,, by Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Disney Enterprises, Inc., Hotfile Corp., Anton Titov, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Universal City Studios Productions LLLP, Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.. Responses due by 1/9/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Stetson, Karen)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 11-20427-WILLIAMS/TURNOFF
DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC.,
TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION,
UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP,
COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., and
WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
HOTFILE CORP., ANTON TITOV, and
DOES 1-10.
Defendants.
/
HOTFILE CORP.,
Counterclaimant,
v.
WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC.,
Counterdefendant.
/
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
DEADLINES SET FORTH IN THE COURT’S SCHEDULING ORDER (DKT # 133)
AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (DKT # 157)
THIS CAUSE came before the court on the Parties’ Joint Motion for Extension of
Deadlines Set Forth in the Scheduling Order (Dkt # 133), as modified by the Court’s Order on
Motion for Extension of Time (Dkt # 157), to Complete Rebuttal Expert Reports and Expert
Discovery, respond to discovery motions, and file motions for summary judgment. This Court
has considered the agreed motion and being otherwise duly advised here, it is hereby:

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Joint Motion for Extension of Deadlines to is
hereby GRANTED. The Scheduling Order in this case (Dkt # 133) is modified as follows:
January 6, 2012

Parties exchange rebuttal expert witness summaries and
reports required by Local Rule 16.1.K.

January 20, 2012

Rebuttal expert depositions are completed.

February 3, 2012

Motions for Summary Judgment on Hotfile Corp.’s
Counterclaim against Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc.
(“Counterclaim”) are filed.

February 10, 2012

All other Motions for Summary Judgment unrelated to the
Counterclaim are filed.

February 24, 2012

Oppositions to Motions for Summary Judgment on the
Counterclaim are filed.

March 2, 2012

Oppositions to Motions for Summary Judgment unrelated
to the Counterclaim are filed.

March 9, 2012

Replies in Support of Motions for Summary Judgment on
the Counterclaim are filed.

March 16, 2012

Replies in Support of Motions for Summary Judgment
unrelated to the Counterclaim are filed.

In addition, the following schedule sets forth the deadlines for filing responses to the
Parties’ discovery motions.
January 5, 2012

Oppositions to any discovery motions filed on December
23, 2011.
Replies in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel the
Production of Titov Deposition Exhibit 27 (Dkt # 180) and
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel the Deposition of Andrei
Ianakov (Dkt # 184).

January 10, 2012

Replies in support of any discovery motions filed on
December 23, 2011.

If Plaintiffs so choose, Plaintiffs may combine their motion for summary judgment on
Anton Titov’s liability with their motion for summary judgment on Hotfile Corp.’s liability, with
any memorandum in support of such a consolidated motion not to exceed 40 pages. Defendants’
opposition to such a consolidated motion shall not exceed 40 pages, and the reply memorandum
in support of such a motion not to exceed 20 pages.

DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at Miami, Florida this ____ day of __________ 2011.
__________________________
Kathleen M. Williams
United States District Judge
cc:

All Counsel of Record