Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Hotfile Corp. et al

Filing 390

NOTICE by Hotfile Corp., Anton Titov Defendants' Notice of Filing the Publicly Filed Redacted Version of the Declaration of Andrew Leibnitz and Exhibits Thereto, Filed in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Exhibits Thereto (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13, # 15 Exhibit 14, # 16 Exhibit 15, # 17 Exhibit 16, # 18 Exhibit 17, # 19 Exhibit 18, # 20 Exhibit 19, # 21 Exhibit 20, # 22 Exhibit 21, # 23 Exhibit 22, # 24 Exhibit 23, # 25 Exhibit 24, # 26 Exhibit 25, # 27 Exhibit 26, # 28 Exhibit 27, # 29 Exhibit 28, # 30 Exhibit 29, # 31 Exhibit 30, # 32 Exhibit 31, # 33 Exhibit 32, # 34 Exhibit 33, # 35 Exhibit 34, # 36 Exhibit 35, # 37 Exhibit 36, # 38 Exhibit 37)(Munn, Janet)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 19 Perkins, Braxton HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 12/16/2011 Page 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 11-20427-WILLIAMS-TURNOFF DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP, COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., and WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC., Plaintiffs, vs. HOTFILE CORP., ANTON TITOV, and DOES 1-10, Defendants. ___________________________ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. ________________________________________________________ HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF BRAXTON PERKINS PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE 30(b)(6) Los Angeles, California Friday, December 16, 2011 Reported by: LORI SCINTA, RPR CSR No. 4811 Job No. 178935B Electronically signed by Lori Scinta (601-264-733-0670) 5ff9ce4d-a4e8-444a-bce6-47911b25f707 Perkins, Braxton 12/16/2011 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER Page 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 11-20427-WILLIAMS-TURNOFF 3 7 DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP, COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., and WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC., 8 Plaintiffs, 4 5 6 9 10 vs. HOTFILE CORP., ANTON TITOV, and DOES 1-10, 11 12 13 Defendants. ____________________________________ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. ______________________________________________________ 14 15 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER Videotaped deposition of BRAXTON PERKINS, 16 17 pursuant to Federal Rule 30(b)(6), taken on behalf of 18 Defendants and Counterclaimant Hotfile Corp., at 19 633 West Fifth Street, Los Angeles, California, 20 beginning at 10:15 A.M. and ending at 7:16 P.M. on 21 Friday, December 16, 2011, before LORI SCINTA, RPR, 22 Certified Shorthand Reporter No. 4811. 23 24 25 Electronically signed by Lori Scinta (601-264-733-0670) 5ff9ce4d-a4e8-444a-bce6-47911b25f707 Perkins, Braxton 12/16/2011 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER Page 3 1 APPEARANCES: 2 3 For Plaintiffs: 4 5 6 7 JENNER & BLOCK LLP BY: DUANE C. POZZA Attorney at Law 1099 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20001-4412 202.639.6000 Email: dpozza@jenner.com 8 -- and -9 10 11 12 NBC UNIVERSAL BY: KAREN GARVER Senior Counsel, Anti-Piracy Legal Affairs 100 Universal City Plaza Universal City, California 91608 818.777.2493 Email: karen.garver@nbcuni.com 13 14 For Defendants and Counterclaimant Hotfile, Corp.: 15 16 17 18 19 FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP BY: DEEPAK GUPTA Attorney at Law 235 Montgomery Street San Francisco, California 94104 415.954.4400 Email: dgupta@fbm.com 20 21 Videographer: 22 23 24 VONYARN MASON SARNOFF COURT REPORTERS 20 Corporate Park, Suite 350 Irvine, California 92606 877.955.3855 25 Electronically signed by Lori Scinta (601-264-733-0670) 5ff9ce4d-a4e8-444a-bce6-47911b25f707 Perkins, Braxton 12/16/2011 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER Electronically signed by Lori Scinta (601-264-733-0670) 5ff9ce4d-a4e8-444a-bce6-47911b25f707 Perkins, Braxton 12/16/2011 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER Electronically signed by Lori Scinta (601-264-733-0670) 0 5ff9ce4d-a4e8-444a-bce6-47911b25f707 Perkins, Braxton 12/16/2011 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER Page 161 04:04 1 MR. POZZA: 04:04 2 THE WITNESS: 04:04 3 always under distribution agreements with partners and 04:04 4 usually behind a transactional apparatus or behind a 04:05 5 negotiated agreement involving advertising as associated 04:05 6 with a playback of the content. 04:05 7 04:05 8 sites or distributors to have full-length content 04:05 9 available in commercially negotiated means. 04:05 10 04:05 11 Objection. Ambiguous. Full-length content is almost So, yes, Universal would create agreements with BY MR. GUPTA: Q Does Universal post or allow others to post its 04:05 12 content on the Internet for free? 04:05 13 full-length content here. MR. POZZA: 04:05 14 04:05 15 04:05 16 And I'm talking about Objection -- BY MR. GUPTA: Q In other words, making it -- 04:05 17 Sorry. 04:05 18 MR. POZZA: 04:05 19 I was going to object. Ambiguous and compound. 04:05 20 Go ahead. BY MR. GUPTA: 04:05 21 Q Does Universal -- I'll cure. Does Universal permit sites other than 04:05 22 04:05 23 Universal-branded sites to host Universal full-length 04:05 24 content in a manner that users can access it for free? 04:06 25 Electronically signed by Lori Scinta (601-264-733-0670) MR. POZZA: Objection. Ambiguous. 5ff9ce4d-a4e8-444a-bce6-47911b25f707 Perkins, Braxton 12/16/2011 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER Page 162 THE WITNESS: Users accessing it for free would 04:06 1 04:06 2 to me imply that there was an advertising element to the 04:06 3 consumer access, or if the marginal cost to a person was 04:06 4 sort of zero, that there may be a subscription element 04:06 5 to the consumer. 04:06 6 04:06 7 belief on the part of Universal where free full-length 04:06 8 content would be freely made available without 04:06 9 negotiations of commercial terms regarding either 04:06 10 transactional pricing to consumers or advertising 04:07 11 revenue or subscription revenue associated with the 04:07 12 consumers accessing full-length content. 04:07 13 BY MR. GUPTA: 04:07 14 I am not aware of any instance or systematic Q Going back to trailers for a moment, does 04:07 15 Universal allow the downloading of trailers from the 04:07 16 Internet for some trailers? 04:07 17 MR. POZZA: 04:07 18 THE WITNESS: 04:07 19 policy on downloading trailers. 04:07 20 possible that under negotiated terms and conditions or 04:07 21 agreed-upon terms and conditions a marketing entity 04:07 22 would provide a file to a distribution partner. 04:07 23 that marketing group worked with that distribution 04:08 24 partner to enable a download, then that could be 04:08 25 happening. Electronically signed by Lori Scinta (601-264-733-0670) Objection. Ambiguous. I'm not aware of a specific It is potentially And if 5ff9ce4d-a4e8-444a-bce6-47911b25f707 Perkins, Braxton 12/16/2011 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER Page 163 04:08 1 I right here don't recall an example of that, 04:08 2 but I can't under oath tell you that categorically I'm 04:08 3 aware that that's never happened or -- because I'm not 04:08 4 fully aware of all the breadth of the deals that may 04:08 5 have taken place. 04:08 6 BY MR. GUPTA: 04:08 7 04:08 8 transferring a trailer owned by Universal to another 04:08 9 Internet user? Q MR. POZZA: 04:08 10 04:08 11 Does Universal object to an Internet user Object as ambiguous, calling for a legal conclusion and outside the scope of the notice. THE WITNESS: 04:08 12 I would imagine Universal would 04:08 13 object if the terms and conditions associated with the 04:08 14 marketing materials were being violated. Again, if the terms and conditions associated 04:08 15 04:09 16 with the distribution of the marketing materials 04:09 17 contemplated that transfer, then we wouldn't object 04:09 18 because we would have put that into the agreement. 04:09 19 BY MR. GUPTA: 04:09 20 04:09 21 Q on this, does Universal object? MR. POZZA: 04:09 22 04:09 23 Same objections and incomplete hypothetical. THE WITNESS: 04:09 24 04:09 25 But where the terms and conditions are silent I'm not aware of them being silent, and I think the objection would be something I Electronically signed by Lori Scinta (601-264-733-0670) 5ff9ce4d-a4e8-444a-bce6-47911b25f707 Perkins, Braxton 12/16/2011 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER Page 164 04:09 1 would route to the law department to review. 04:09 2 I probably wouldn't be in a position to opine the full 04:09 3 legal understanding of what would be "objectable" other 04:09 4 than my general business understanding that I've tried 04:09 5 to communicate about how we distribute marketing 04:09 6 materials. 04:09 7 BY MR. GUPTA: 04:09 8 04:10 9 04:10 10 Q Are you aware of any business arrangements in which Universal has set up a deal such that it doesn't object to a user transferring a trailer to another user? MR. POZZA: 04:10 11 04:10 12 I guess -- Objection. Ambiguous, lacks foundation, outside the scope of the notice. THE WITNESS: 04:10 13 I'm not aware of a specific 04:10 14 example where we -- Universal or an entity of Universal 04:10 15 created a marketing campaign that involved transfers, 04:10 16 point to point, user to user. But, again, I can't attest that I'm fully aware 04:10 17 04:10 18 that that -- that I can confidently tell you that's 04:10 19 never happened. 04:10 20 example of when we would have. 04:10 21 there would have been terms and conditions likely put in 04:11 22 place of that campaign. 04:11 23 BY MR. GUPTA: 04:11 24 04:11 25 Q I don't know right now or recall an But if we did, again, Are you aware of any business arrangements in which Universal set up the deal such that it expressly Electronically signed by Lori Scinta (601-264-733-0670) 5ff9ce4d-a4e8-444a-bce6-47911b25f707 Perkins, Braxton 12/16/2011 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER Page 165 04:11 1 prohibited a user from transferring a trailer to another 04:11 2 user? 04:11 3 MR. POZZA: 04:11 4 THE WITNESS: 04:11 5 agreement an express prohibition would have been written 04:11 6 or not. 04:11 7 04:11 8 terms and conditions would indicate whatever the desire 04:11 9 of the marketing group would be, and that if there was Same set of objections. I would not know if in the My general business understanding is that the 04:11 10 the desire to not prohibit it, then that would be there; 04:11 11 and if the desire was to prohibit it, then it would be 04:11 12 in the agreement. 04:11 13 BY MR. GUPTA: 04:11 14 Q So the answer is: You are not aware of any 04:11 15 specific business arrangements set up such that users 04:11 16 were expressly prohibited from transferring? MR. POZZA: 04:12 17 04:12 18 and answered. THE WITNESS: 04:12 19 04:12 20 Same set of objections, and asked I mean, I do -- I feel like I'm -- I have answered the question. I don't -- again, I -- I -- I'm not aware of 04:12 21 04:12 22 the full breadth of all the marketing campaigns and the 04:12 23 terms and conditions for any and all content. It's possible that some agreements might 04:12 24 04:12 25 expressly prohibit it. Electronically signed by Lori Scinta (601-264-733-0670) It's possible some may expressly 5ff9ce4d-a4e8-444a-bce6-47911b25f707 Perkins, Braxton 12/16/2011 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER Page 166 04:12 1 allow it. But I'm just -- I'm not aware of examples of 04:12 2 either of those, nor am I aware of the full breadth of 04:12 3 the deals going through. 04:12 4 BY MR. GUPTA: 04:12 5 Q 04:13 6 cyberlocker? 04:13 7 04:13 8 scope of the notice to the extent it involves sites 04:13 9 other than Hotfile. Has Universal ever posted a file on a MR. POZZA: THE WITNESS: Object as ambiguous and outside the 04:13 10 I guess you'd have to define 04:13 11 "cyberlocker" for me in order for me to accurately try 04:13 12 and answer that question. 04:13 13 BY MR. GUPTA: 04:13 14 Q Let's start with Hotfile. Has Universal ever posted a file on Hotfile? 04:13 15 04:13 16 Okay. A I am not aware of any instance where a company 04:13 17 account or an agent of the company acting at the 04:13 18 direction of the company uploaded something to Hotfile. 04:14 19 04:14 20 04:14 21 Q What's your understanding of what is digital fingerprinting? A Digital printer -- fingerprinting is a 04:14 22 technology that allows for automatic content 04:14 23 recognition. 04:14 24 Q 04:14 25 Electronically signed by Lori Scinta (601-264-733-0670) Can you tell me what it does? MR. POZZA: I'll object to this -- this line of 5ff9ce4d-a4e8-444a-bce6-47911b25f707 Perkins, Braxton 12/16/2011 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER Page 257 1 I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand 2 3 Reporter of the State of California, do hereby certify: That the foregoing proceedings were taken 4 5 before me at the time and place herein set forth; that 6 any witnesses in the foregoing proceedings, prior to 7 testifying, were duly sworn; that a record of the 8 proceedings was made by me using machine shorthand 9 which was thereafter transcribed under my direction; 10 that the foregoing transcript is a true record of the 11 testimony given. Further, that if the foregoing pertains to 12 13 the original transcript of a deposition in a Federal 14 Case, before completion of the proceedings, review of 15 the transcript [ x ] was [ ] was not requested. 16 I further certify I am neither financially 17 interested in the action nor a relative or employee 18 of any attorney or party to this action. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have this date 19 20 subscribed my name. 21 22 Dated: 12-20-11 23 24 25 Electronically signed by Lori Scinta (601-264-733-0670) ________________________________ LORI SCINTA, RPR CSR No. 4811 5ff9ce4d-a4e8-444a-bce6-47911b25f707

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?