Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Hotfile Corp. et al

Filing 400

RESPONSE in Opposition re 318 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment PUBLICLY FILED VERSION >PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT HOTFILE CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR PARTIL SUMMARY JUDGMENT BASED ON DIGITAL MILLENIUM COPYRIGHT ACT (AND ATTACHED DECLARATION OF JENNIFER V. YEH IN OPPOSITION TO HOTFILE CORP.'S MPSJ AND TITOV'S MSJ) (PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION) filed by Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Disney Enterprises, Inc., Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Universal City Studios Productions LLLP, Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibits 125-129 to Declaration of Jennifer Yeh, # 2 Exhibit Exhibits 130-134 to Declaration of Jennifer Yeh, # 3 Exhibit Exhibits 135-139 to Declaration of Jennifer Yeh, # 4 Exhibit 140 to J. Yeh Declaration, # 5 Exhibit 141 to J. Yeh Declaration, # 6 Exhibit 142 to J. Yeh Declaration, # 7 Exhibit 143 to J. Yeh Declaration, # 8 Exhibit 144 to J. Yeh Declaration, # 9 Exhibit 145 to J. Yeh Declaration, # 10 Exhibit 146 to J. Yeh Declaration, # 11 Exhibit 147 to J. Yeh Declaration, # 12 Exhibit 148 to J. Yeh Declaration, # 13 Exhibit 149 to J. Yeh Declaration, # 14 Exhibit 150 to J. Yeh Declaration)(Stetson, Karen)

Download PDF
Yeh Exhibit 125 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 2 CASE NO. 11-20427-WILLIAMS-TURNOFF 3 4 DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM 5 CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP, 6 COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., and WARNER BROS. 7 ENTERTAINMENT INC., 8 9 10 Plaintiffs, vs. HOTFILE CORP., ANTON TITOV, and DOES 1-10, 11 Defendants. 12 ________________________ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. 13 ________________________________________________________ 14 15 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 16 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF BETSY ZEDEK, ESQUIRE 17 PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE 30(b)(6) 18 Los Angeles, California 19 Tuesday, December 13, 2011 20 21 Reported by: CHERYL R. KAMALSKI 22 CSR No. 7113 23 Job No. 179149 24 25 Page 1 Sarnoff, A VERITEXT COMPANY 877-955-3855 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 3 4 CASE NO. 11-20427-WILLIAMS-TURNOFF DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM 5 CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP, 6 COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., and WARNER BROS. 7 ENTERTAINMENT INC., 8 9 10 Plaintiffs, vs. HOTFILE CORP., ANTON TITOV, and DOES 1-10, 11 Defendants. 12 _________________________ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. 13 ______________________________________________________ 14 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 15 16 Videotaped Deposition of BETSY ZEDEK, ESQUIRE, 17 pursuant to Federal Rule 30(b)(6), taken on behalf of 18 Defendants and Counterclaimant, at 633 West Fifth 19 Street, Suite 3600, Los Angeles, California, beginning 20 at 9:37 a.m. and ending at 5:27 p.m. on Tuesday, 21 December 13, 2011, before CHERYL R. KAMALSKI, Certified 22 Shorthand Reporter No. 7113. 23 24 25 Page 2 Sarnoff, A VERITEXT COMPANY 877-955-3855 1 2 3 4 5 6 APPEARANCES: For Plaintiffs: JENNER & BLOCK LLP BY: DUANE POZZA Attorney at Law 1099 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20001-4412 202.639.6000 7 For Defendants and Counterclaimant: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP BY: JANEL THAMKUL Attorney at Law 235 Montgomery Street San Francisco, California 94104 415.954.4400 Also Present: ELIZABETH VALENTINA Videographer: CHRIS JORDAN SARNOFF, a Veritext Company 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 3 Sarnoff, A VERITEXT COMPANY 877-955-3855 1 2 3 4 5 6 Q Does Fox have a special rightsholder account with Hotfile? A I do not believe that Fox holds one directly as in internally at Fox. Q Did Fox ever ask for a special rightsholder account from Hotfile? 7 MR. POZZA: 8 THE WITNESS: 9 we did. Objection; ambiguous. I'm not sure. I'm not aware that But it may have happened in the context of this 10 litigation. 11 BY MS. THAMKUL: 12 13 Q Do you know if any of Fox's vendors use Hotfile's special rightsholder account? 14 A I am aware that some of them have used it, yes. 15 Q Which ones? Page 77 Sarnoff, A VERITEXT COMPANY 877-955-3855 1 2 I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand Reporter of the State of California, do hereby certify: 3 That the foregoing proceedings were taken 4 before me at the time and place herein set forth; that 5 any witnesses in the foregoing proceedings, prior to 6 testifying, were duly sworn; that a record of the 7 proceedings was made by me using machine shorthand 8 which was thereafter transcribed under my direction; 9 that the foregoing transcript is a true record of the 10 testimony given. 11 Further, that if the foregoing pertains to 12 the original transcript of a deposition in a Federal 13 Case, before completion of the proceedings, review of 14 the transcript [ ] was [ ] was not requested 15 I further certify I am neither financially 16 interested in the action nor a relative or employee 17 of any attorney or any party to this action. 18 19 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have this date subscribed my name. 20 21 Dated: 12/22/2011 22 23 _________________________________ CHERYL R. KAMALSKI 24 CSR No. 7113 25 Page 222 Sarnoff, A VERITEXT COMPANY 877-955-3855 Yeh Exhibit 126 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP, COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., and WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC., Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 11-20427-WILLIAMS-TURNOFF vs. HOTFILE CORP., ANTON TITOV, and DOES 1-10, Defendants. _________________________ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. _______________________________________________________ HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF MICHAEL BENTKOVER Los Angeles, California Tuesday, December 13, 2011 Reported by: LORI SCINTA, RPR CSR No. 4811 Job No. 177476A MICHAEL BENTKOVER HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 12/13/2011 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 3 4 7 DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP, COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., and WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC., 8 Plaintiffs, 5 6 9 10 vs. CASE NO. 11-20427-WILLIAMS-TURNOFF HOTFILE CORP., ANTON TITOV, and DOES 1-10, 11 12 13 Defendants. _________________________ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. _______________________________________________________ 14 15 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 16 Videotaped deposition of MICHAEL BENTKOVER, 17 taken on behalf of Defendants and Counterclaimant 18 at 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 3600, Los Angeles, 19 California, beginning at 9:38 A.M. and ending at 20 12:17 P.M. on Tuesday, December 13, 2011, before 21 LORI SCINTA, RPR, Certified Shorthand Reporter No. 22 4811. 23 24 25 2 MICHAEL BENTKOVER HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 12/13/2011 APPEARANCES: 2 3 For Plaintiffs: 4 5 6 7 JENNER & BLOCK LLP BY: STEVEN B. FABRIZIO Attorney at Law 1099 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20001-4412 202.639.6000 Email: sfabrizio@jenner.com 8 9 For Defendants and Counterclaimant: 10 11 12 13 14 FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP BY: EVAN M. ENGSTROM Attorney at Law 235 Montgomery Street San Francisco, California 94104 415.954.4400 Email: eengstrom@fbm.com 15 16 Videographer: 17 18 19 20 VONYARN MASON SARNOFF COURT REPORTERS 20 Corporate Park, Suite 350 Irvine, California 92606 877.955.3855 21 22 23 24 25 3 MICHAEL BENTKOVER HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 12/13/2011 09:54 1 09:54 2 to read it? 09:54 3 or ask him whether -- 09:54 4 09:54 5 09:54 6 THE WITNESS: 09:54 7 to follow-up and find out if Hotfile 09:54 8 is ready for Warner Bros. to use a 09:54 9 rapid takedown tool which you have 09:54 10 09:54 11 09:54 12 takedown notices (including thousands 09:55 13 of infringing links) and we appreciate 09:55 14 how fast you've been removing files, 09:55 15 but unfortunately the files are 09:55 16 reposted immediately and having a 09:55 17 takedown tool would be ideal in order 09:55 18 to curb piracy." 09:55 19 09:55 20 09:55 21 09:55 22 A No. 09:55 23 Q You don't agree with the statement that you 09:55 24 09:55 25 MR. FABRIZIO: You're literally just asking him You're not asking him to agree with it MR. ENGSTROM: Just in the record. I want to get it read into the record. "Dear Hotfile, I wanted been working on establishing. "We have been sending many BY MR. ENGSTROM: Q Did you appreciate how -- do you agree with it? You appreciated how fast Hotfile was removing files? made? MR. FABRIZIO: Objection. 26 MICHAEL BENTKOVER HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 12/13/2011 09:55 1 09:55 2 09:55 3 09:55 4 09:55 5 A I was simply being courteous. 09:55 6 Q Okay. 09:55 7 instance that you can -- that you're aware of indicate 09:55 8 to Hotfile that they were fast in responding to files 09:55 9 and that you were satisfied with it? 09:55 10 MR. FABRIZIO: 09:55 11 THE WITNESS: 09:55 12 Please repeat it. 09:55 13 BY MR. ENGSTROM: 09:55 14 09:56 15 this instance tell Hotfile that you were appreciative of 09:56 16 how fast they had been removing files when in reality 09:56 17 you believed they were not removing files quickly? 09:56 18 09:56 19 09:56 20 09:56 21 few emails to them. 09:56 22 being polite and courteous. 09:56 23 BY MR. ENGSTROM: 09:56 24 09:56 25 THE WITNESS: No. BY MR. ENGSTROM: Q Why did you tell Hotfile that you appreciated how fast they had been removing files? Q Did Hotfile -- did you ever in any other Objection. Lacks foundation. I don't remember the question. Did you in any other circumstances other than MR. FABRIZIO: Objection. Lacks foundation and compound. THE WITNESS: Q Okay. Yes, I believe I wrote that in a It was a standard response. I was Do you believe that Hotfile had any reason to believe that you were dissatisfied with the 27 MICHAEL BENTKOVER HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 12/13/2011 10:04 1 10:04 2 again for the removal tool and increasing our limit to 10:04 3 1000 per day" and "for Warner Bros.' Removals." 10:04 4 10:04 5 10:04 6 MR. ENGSTROM: 10:04 7 "I just wanted to thank you again for the 10:04 8 removal tool and increasing our limit to 1000 per day 10:04 9 for Warner Bros.' Removals." 10:04 10 10:04 11 MR. FABRIZIO: 10:04 12 calls for speculation. 10:04 13 10:04 14 10:04 15 Q Were you satisfied with the SRA tool? 10:04 16 A No. 10:04 17 Q Why were you not satisfied with the SRA tool? 10:04 18 A The nature of piracy causes people to upload 10:05 19 and reupload after they're being deleted, and it still 10:05 20 wasn't enough. 10:05 21 Q It wasn't enough to what? 10:05 22 A Curb piracy on Hotfile. 10:05 23 Q Okay. 10:05 24 10:05 25 MR. ENGSTROM: MR. FABRIZIO: "I just wanted to thank you Objection. I'm not quite sure you read that right. Q I can try again. Was Warner Bros. satisfied with the SRA tool? THE WITNESS: Objection. Lacks foundation, No. BY MR. ENGSTROM: Did you ever communicate to Hotfile that the SRA was insufficient to curb piracy on Hotfile? MR. FABRIZIO: Lacks foundation. 36 MICHAEL BENTKOVER HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 12/13/2011 10:06 1 A Did I appreciate the tool? 10:06 2 Q Yes. 10:06 3 A Yes, I did. 10:06 4 Q Why did you appreciate the tool? 10:06 5 A Because I needed a way to take the files down 10:06 6 10:06 7 10:06 8 10:06 9 10:06 10 10:06 11 10:06 12 10:06 13 10:06 14 10:06 15 MR. FABRIZIO: 10:06 16 THE WITNESS: 10:06 17 just to take the files down. 10:06 18 else to stop the problem. 10:06 19 BY MR. ENGSTROM: 10:06 20 10:06 21 10:06 22 MR. FABRIZIO: 10:06 23 THE WITNESS: 10:06 24 10:06 25 as fast as possible. Q Do you believe that Hotfile was cooperating with you in combating piracy on the site? A No, I do not. MR. FABRIZIO: Objection. Vague. BY MR. ENGSTROM: Q You do not? Why do you not believe they were cooperating with you to combat piracy on the site? Q Same objection. The piracy problem was not enough Hotfile was doing nothing Did you ever ask Hotfile to do anything else to stop the problem? Objection. Lacks foundation. No, I did not. BY MR. ENGSTROM: Q You did not. 38 MICHAEL BENTKOVER HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 12/13/2011 1 2 3 4 I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand Reporter of the State of California, do hereby certify: That the foregoing proceedings were taken 5 before me at the time and place herein set forth; that 6 any witnesses in the foregoing proceedings, prior to 7 testifying, were duly sworn; that a record of the 8 proceedings was made by me using machine shorthand 9 which was thereafter transcribed under my direction; 10 that the foregoing transcript is a true record of the 11 testimony given. 12 Further, that if the foregoing pertains to 13 the original transcript of a deposition in a Federal 14 Case, before completion of the proceedings, review of 15 the transcript [ x ] was [ ] was not requested. 16 I further certify I am neither financially 17 interested in the action nor a relative or employee 18 of any attorney or party to this action. 19 20 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have this date subscribed my name. 21 22 Dated: 12-15-11 23 24 25 ________________________________ LORI SCINTA, RPR CSR No. 4811 112 Yeh Exhibit 127 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP, COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., and WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC., Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 11-20427-WILLIAMS-TURNOFF vs. HOTFILE CORP., ANTON TITOV, and DOES 1-10, Defendants. _________________________ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. _______________________________________________________ CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF DAVID P. KAPLAN, ESQUIRE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE 30(b)(6) Los Angeles, California Tuesday, December 13, 2011 Volume 1 Reported by: LORI SCINTA, RPR CSR No. 4811 Job No. 177476B DAVID P. KAPLAN, ESQ. CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 12/13/2011 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 3 4 7 DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP, COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., and WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC., 8 Plaintiffs, 5 6 9 10 vs. CASE NO. 11-20427-WILLIAMS-TURNOFF HOTFILE CORP., ANTON TITOV, and DOES 1-10, 11 12 13 Defendants. _________________________ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. _______________________________________________________ 14 15 16 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER Videotaped deposition of DAVID P. KAPLAN, 17 ESQUIRE, Volume 1, pursuant to Federal Rule 30(b)(6), 18 taken on behalf of Defendants and Counterclaimant, 19 at 633 West Fifth Street, Los Angeles, California, 20 beginning at 2:18 P.M. and ending at 4:58 P.M. on 21 Tuesday, December 13, 2011, before LORI SCINTA, RPR, 22 Certified Shorthand Reporter No. 4811. 23 24 25 2 DAVID P. KAPLAN, ESQ. CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 12/13/2011 APPEARANCES: 2 3 For Plaintiffs: 4 5 6 7 JENNER & BLOCK LLP BY: STEVEN B. FABRIZIO Attorney at Law 1099 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20001-4412 202.639.6000 Email: sfabrizio@jenner.com 8 9 For Defendants and Counterclaimant: 10 11 12 13 14 FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP BY: EVAN M. ENGSTROM Attorney at Law 235 Montgomery Street San Francisco, California 94104 415.954.4400 Email: eengstrom@fbm.com 15 16 Videographer: 17 18 19 20 VONYARN MASON SARNOFF COURT REPORTERS 20 Corporate Park, Suite 350 Irvine, California 92606 877.955.3855 21 22 23 24 25 3 DAVID P. KAPLAN, ESQ. CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 12/13/2011 02:41 1 02:41 2 02:41 3 I'm sure you have all those documents. 02:41 4 THE WITNESS: 02:41 5 documents one by one and see, but I do recall that there 02:41 6 were some discussion in -- in the requesting additional 02:41 7 capacity for the takedown tool that the problem of 02:41 8 infringement on Hotfile was becoming so overwhelming 02:41 9 that the SRA tool as had been originally provided, you 02:42 10 know, was ineffective. 02:42 11 MR. ENGSTROM: 02:42 12 02:42 13 (WB Exhibit 24 was marked for 02:43 14 identification by the court reporter.) 02:43 15 02:43 16 Q Do you recognize this document? 02:43 17 A I do. 02:43 18 Q Okay. 02:43 19 02:43 20 A I don't. 02:43 21 Q Okay. 02:43 22 02:43 23 "I just wanted to thank you again for 02:43 24 The removal tool and increasing our 02:43 25 limit to" a thousand "per day for MR. FABRIZIO: Objection. Compound, overbroad and calls for speculation. Yeah. I'd have to look at those Let me mark as Exhibit 24 an email that describes perhaps what you're talking about. BY MR. ENGSTROM: Do you have any reason to believe it's not an authentic document? Michael Bentkover in this email dated September 3rd, 2009, writes to Hotfile and says, 23 DAVID P. KAPLAN, ESQ. CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 12/13/2011 02:43 1 Warner Bros." 02:43 2 He then goes on to ask, "Can you 02:43 3 increase our limit to 2,000 just to be 02:43 4 on the safe side which will ensure we 02:43 5 don't have to email you for your 02:43 6 prompt action?" 02:43 7 Is he referring to this request to increase 02:43 8 02:44 9 02:44 10 02:44 11 THE WITNESS: 02:44 12 what's contained in the email. 02:44 13 02:44 14 that we were bumping up against the limit as originally 02:44 15 established for the SRA tool and the overflow was then 02:44 16 having to go through the old email way of communicating 02:44 17 through the abuse account. 02:44 18 02:44 19 coming up that fall, he was asking if the SRA tool could 02:44 20 have the limit increased to account for that. 02:44 21 02:44 22 Hotfile. 02:44 23 BY MR. ENGSTROM: 02:44 24 02:44 25 files that you referred to a minute ago? MR. FABRIZIO: Objection. Calls for speculation. I'm not sure exactly other than The -- and reading that, my understanding was And so because we had a number of big titles We expected that there would be more piracy on Q Did Hotfile ever refuse to or fail to increase the quota of files that could be deleted through the SRA 24 DAVID P. KAPLAN, ESQ. CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 12/13/2011 1 2 3 4 I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand Reporter of the State of California, do hereby certify: That the foregoing proceedings were taken 5 before me at the time and place herein set forth; that 6 any witnesses in the foregoing proceedings, prior to 7 testifying, were duly sworn; that a record of the 8 proceedings was made by me using machine shorthand 9 which was thereafter transcribed under my direction; 10 that the foregoing transcript is a true record of the 11 testimony given. 12 Further, that if the foregoing pertains to 13 the original transcript of a deposition in a Federal 14 Case, before completion of the proceedings, review of 15 the transcript [ x ] was [ ] was not requested. 16 I further certify I am neither financially 17 interested in the action nor a relative or employee 18 of any attorney or party to this action. 19 20 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have this date subscribed my name. 21 22 Dated: 12-15-11 23 24 25 ________________________________ LORI SCINTA, RPR CSR No. 4811 106 Yeh Exhibit 128 Highly Confidential Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 11-20427-WILLIAMS/TURNOFF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP, COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., and WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Plaintiff, v. HOTFILE CORP., ANTON TITOV, and DOES 1-10, Defendants. HOTFILE CORP., Counterclaimant, v. WARNER BROS ENTERTAINMENT INC., Counterdefendant. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VOLUME I H I G H L Y C O N F I D E N T I A L (Pursuant to protective order, the following transcript has been designated highly confidential) 30(b)(6) DEPOSITION OF ANTON TITOV Radisson Blu Hotel Sofia, Bulgaria Monday, December 5, 2011 Job Number: 44174 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 800-702-9580 Highly Confidential Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 A P P E A R A N C E S ATTORNEY FOR THE PLAINTIFFS: JENNER & BLOCK BY: STEVEN B. FABRIZIO, ESQ. 1099 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ATTORNEY FOR THE DEFENDANTS HOTFILE CORP., AND ANTON TITOV: FARELLA, BRAUN & MARTEL BY: RODERICK M. THOMPSON, ESQ. 235 Montgomery Street San Francisco, California 94104 13 14 15 16 BOSTON LAW GROUP VALENTIN GURVITS 825 Beacon Street Newton Center, MA 02459 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 800-702-9580 Highly Confidential Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Also present: Court reporter: Fiona Farson TSG Reporting Videographer: Simon Rutson TSG Reporting Interpreter: Assist. Prof. Boris Naimushin, Ph.D. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 800-702-9580 Highly Confidential Page 64 1 reports or anything like that to need -- things to keep 2 the corporation alive. 3 activities. But I am not aware of any other 4 6 Q. Okay. Does Lemuria have a physical office? 7 A. Yes, it does. 8 Q. And where is that? 9 A. In Fort Lauderdale, Florida. 10 Q. What is the address? 11 A. 110 East Broward Boulevard, suite number 1736. 12 Q. 1736? 13 A. 1736, correct. 14 Q. And you said "Broward"; is that B-R-O-W-A-R-D? 15 A. Yes, I believe so. 16 Q. Okay. And is that address an office, or is that a mailbox service? 17 18 A. It is an office. 19 Q. Okay. 20 A. Yes, I did. 21 Q. Does anybody currently work out of that office? 22 A. Currently not. 23 Q. Can you repeat your answer? 24 A. Currently not. 25 Q. Has anyone ever worked out of that office? Have you ever visited that office? TSG Reporting - Worldwide 800-702-9580 Highly Confidential Page 65 1 MR. THOMPSON: 2 A. 3 Objection, vague. "Ever" is a big time. So I visited the office; I performed some work inside it. 4 BY MR. FABRIZIO: 5 Q. So as for me, yes. Okay, let me ask it this way: Other than you 6 periodically visiting the office, has anyone ever worked 7 from Lemuria's office on 110 East Broward Boulevard? 8 A. I don't actually know. 9 Q. You don't know, or no? 10 A. I don't know, but I don't believe anybody worked, except 11 12 me, from this office for Hotfile. Q. 13 Approximately how many days have you spent working out of that office? 14 A. I don't know. 15 Q. More than ten? 16 MR. THOMPSON: 17 A. Objection. Calls for speculation. It could be ten, but it's kind of hard decision. TSG Reporting - Worldwide 800-702-9580 Most REDACTED Highly Confidential Page 189 1 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE OF COURT REPORTER 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I, Fiona Farson, with TSG Reporting, hereby certify that the testimony of the witness Anton Titov in the foregoing transcript, taken on Monday, December 5, 2011 was reported by me in machine shorthand and was thereafter transcribed by me; and that the foregoing transcript is a true and accurate verbatim record of the said testimony. I further certify that I am not a relative, employee, counsel or financially involved with any of the parties to the within cause, nor am I an employee or relative of any counsel for the parties, nor am I in any way interested in the outcome of the within cause. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Signed: ........................ Fiona Farson Dated: December 15th, 2011 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 800-702-9580 Highly Confidential Page 191 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 11-20427-WILLIAMS/TURNOFF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP, COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., and WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Plaintiff, v. HOTFILE CORP., ANTON TITOV, and DOES 1-10, Defendants. HOTFILE CORP., Counterclaimant, v. WARNER BROS ENTERTAINMENT INC., Counterdefendant. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VOLUME II H I G H L Y C O N F I D E N T I A L (Pursuant to protective order, the following transcript has been designated highly confidential) 30(b)(6) DEPOSITION OF ANTON TITOV Radisson Blu Hotel Sofia, Bulgaria Tuesday, December 6, 2011 AT: 9:10 a.m. Job No: 44175 TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877) 702-9580 Highly Confidential Page 192 1 2 3 4 5 6 A P P E A R A N C E S ATTORNEY FOR THE PLAINTIFFS: JENNER & BLOCK BY: STEVEN B. FABRIZIO, ESQ. 1099 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ATTORNEY FOR THE DEFENDANTS HOTFILE CORP., AND ANTON TITOV: FARELLA, BRAUN & MARTEL BY: RODERICK M. THOMPSON, ESQ. 235 Montgomery Street San Francisco, California 94104 BOSTON LAW GROUP VALENTIN GURVITS 825 Beacon Street Newton Center, MA 02459 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877) 702-9580 Highly Confidential Page 193 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Also present: Court reporter: Fiona Farson TSG Reporting Videographer: Simon Rutson TSG Reporting Interpreter: Assist. Prof. Boris Naimushin, Ph.D. Technical expert: Kelly Truelove 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877) 702-9580 Highly Confidential Page 271 9 Q. 10 11 In what ways has Hotfile attempted to cooperate with Warner and the other studios? A. By responding expeditiously to takedown notices, 12 providing SRA tool to Warner and Dtecnet, who is agent 13 for -- I believe other studios; I'm not sure. 14 15 (Reporter clarification.) A. 16 It's an agent for other studios. There might be others, but that's what I can think of. 17 BY MR. FABRIZIO: 18 Q. Well, can you think of any other way in which Hotfile 19 attempted to cooperate with Warner and the other 20 studios? 21 A. I don't know. That's what I can think of now. TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877) 702-9580 REDACTED Yeh Exhibit 129 REDACTED

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?