Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Hotfile Corp. et al

Filing 426

NOTICE by Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Disney Enterprises, Inc., Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Universal City Studios Productions LLLP, Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. re 425 Reply to Response to Motion,, >>PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF FILING PUBLIC REDACTED VERSIONS OF REPLY DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT<< (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Reply Dweclaration of Jennifer V. Yeh in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (public redacted version), # 2 Exhibit 151 to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 3 Exhibit 152 to declaration of J. Yeh, # 4 Exhibit 153 to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 5 Exhibit 154 to declaration of J. Yeh, # 6 Exhibit 155 to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 7 Exhibit 156 to declaration of J. Yeh, # 8 Affidavit Reply Declaration of Dr. Ian Foster in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (public redacted version), # 9 Exhibit A to Declaration of I. Foster, # 10 Exhibit B to Declaration of I. Foster, # 11 Affidavit Reply Declaration of Dr. Richard Waterman in Support of Plaintiffs' MSJ (public redacted version))(Stetson, Karen)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 11-20427-WILLIAMS/TURNOFF DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP, COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., and WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC., Plaintiffs, v. HOTFILE CORP., ANTON TITOV, and DOES 1-10. Defendants. / HOTFILE CORP., Counterclaimant, v. WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC., Counterdefendant. / REPLY DECLARATION OF JENNIFER V. YEH IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION I, Jennifer V. Yeh, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney at the law firm of Jenner & Block LLP, and counsel to the plaintiffs Disney Enterprises, Inc., Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Universal City Studios Productions LLLP, Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., and Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. The statements made in this declaration are based on my personal knowledge including on information provided to me by colleagues or other personnel working under my supervision on this case. If called to testify, I would testify as follows: 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit 151 is a true and correct copy of excerpts of the deposition of Professor James Boyle, taken on Dec. 21, 2011 and Jan. 19, 2012 in the above-captioned case. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 152 is a true and correct copy of excerpts of the deposition of Dr. Daniel Levy, taken on Jan. 17, 2012 in the above-captioned case. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 153 is a true and correct copy of excerpts of the deposition of defendant Anton Titov, in his personal capacity and as Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) representative of defendant Hotfile Corp., taken from Dec. 5 to Dec. 8, 2011 in the above-captioned case. 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit 154 is a true and correct copy of a printout of a screenshot from the website FileMirrors.Info, printed on March 9, 2012 from the indicated URL. 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit 155 is a true and correct copy of a printout of a screenshot of the Affiliate page of the Hotfile website, printed on July 28, 2010 from the indicated URL. 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit 156 is Appendix A to Plaintiffs’ Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment, a demonstrative illustrating data related to ‘zero-download’ files on the Hotfile system. Dr. Ian Foster analyzed this data and determined that over another of the “zero-download” files were deleted by Hotfile for “inactivity”, of the “zero-download” files were deleted either because the file was identified as infringing or because the user was terminated as a repeat infringer, and less than download files (only Foster Reply Decl. ¶ 11. of the zero- of all files ever uploaded to Hotfile) are actually active files. See I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 16, 2012. _____________________________ Jennifer V. Yeh

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?