Elisa Violeta Archibold v. Azamara Club Cruises, et al

Filing 1

NOTICE OF REMOVAL Filing fee $ 350.00 receipt number 113C-3796832, filed by Azamara Club Cruises, Celebrity Cruises Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B1, # 4 Exhibit B2, # 5 Exhibit C)(Ginsberg, Randy)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO:_________________________ ELISA VIOLETA ARCHIBOLD, Plaintiff, vs. AZAMARA CLUB CRUISES and CELEBRITY CRUISES, INC. Defendant. __________________________/ NOTICE OF REMOVAL Defendant, CRUISES, AZAMARA INC., CLUB (“Defendant”), CRUISES by and and CELEBRITY through its undersigned counsel, hereby files this, its Notice of Removal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1441, et seq., and 9 U.S.C. §202, et seq., and respectfully states as follows: 1. This is an action by ELISA VIOLETA ARCHIBOLD (“Plaintiff”), a seaman from Panama and former employee of Defendant, who alleges she suffered an injury during the course of her employment aboard the cruise ship Quest. CASE NO. _______________________ 2. At all times material to Plaintiff’s Complaint, the terms of Plaintiff’s employment were governed by a Sign on Employment parties. Agreement (“SOEA”) between the A copy of the applicable SOEA is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” 3. The SOEA incorporates a Collective Bargaining Agreement (“CBA”), attached hereto as Exhibit “B.” 4. The CBA at Article 33, provides, in pertinent part, as follows: …all grievances including those referenced in Article 28 , and any other dispute whatsoever, whether in contract, regulatory, tort, or otherwise … shall be referred to an resolved exclusively by binding arbitration pursuant to the United Nations Conventions on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York 1958), 21 U.S.T. 2517, 300 UN.T.S. 5. agreed By signing the SOEA, Plaintiff acknowledged and to be bound by its terms and conditions including those incorporated by referenced within the CBA. 2 CASE NO. _______________________ 6. The SOEA and incorporated CBA constitute an arbitration agreement falling under the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the “Convention”). 7. 9 U.S.C. §205 states: Where the subject matter on an action or proceeding pending in a State court relates to an arbitration agreement or award falling under the Convention, the defendant or the defendants may, at any time before the trial thereof, remove such action or proceedings to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where the action or proceeding is pending. 8. the Accordingly this suit is an action over which United States District Court has original jurisdiction under the provisions of 9 U.S.C. § 202 et. seq., and one that may be removed to federal court under the provisions of 9 U.S.C. § 205, in that it is an action arising under the laws of the United States and relating to an arbitration agreement falling under the Convention. 3 CASE NO. _______________________ 9. On or about April 15, 2011, Plaintiff served RCCL with a Complaint in state court in the Eleventh Circuit of Miami-Dade County, Florida, ELISA VIOLETA ARCHIBOLD v. AZAMARA CLUB CRUISES and CELEBRITY CRUISES, INC., Case No. 11-10119-CA-20. A copy of the Complaint and all other pleadings, process, and orders in this case are attached hereto as Exhibit “C,” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1446(a). 10. This suit is an action of which this court has original jurisdiction under the provision of 9 U.S.C. § 202 et. seq., and one that may be removed to this court under the provisions of 9 U.S.C. § 205, in that it is an action arising under the laws of the United States and relating to an arbitration agreement falling under the Convention. The grounds for removal are as follows: a) There has been no trial of the state court b) ELISA VIOLETA ARCHIBOLD is a seaman from action. Panama. Defendant is a foreign corporation, and the 4 CASE NO. _______________________ QUEST is a vessel registered in Marjuro, Marshal Islands. c) The underlying SOEA and CBA requires arbitration in countries which are signatory to the Convention. Defendant stipulates to the application of United States law in arbitration. Moreover, Defendant stipulates the arbitration shall proceed in Miami, Florida where Plaintiff’s attorney is located and the venue in which Plaintiff filed her original action. d) Because the Agreement is between a foreign corporation and a foreign seaman and because the Agreement provides for arbitration, this dispute falls under the provisions of the Convention. See 9 U.S.C. §202 et. seq. 11. Accordingly, this court has jurisdiction over this action, and this case is removed to the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida pursuant to U.S.C. § 205. 12. Defendant files and presents herewith the sum of $350.00 as required by 28 U.S.C. §1446. 5 CASE NO. _______________________ WHEREFORE, Defendant, AZAMARA CLUB CRUISES and CELEBRITY CRUISES, INC., moves this court for an order that the action now pending against it in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, in and for Miami-Dade County, described above, be removed to this Court and proceed therein. Dated: May 31, 2011 Respectfully submitted, AZAMARA CLUB CRUISES and CELEBRITY CRUISES, INC.. 1050 Caribbean Way Miami, Florida 33132 (305) 539-6000 Tel. (305) 539-8101 Fax By:_/s/ RANDY S. GINSBERG RANDY S. GINSBERG Fla. Bar No.: 185485 6 CASE NO. _______________________ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served via regular mail on May 31, 2011 to: Brett Rivkind, Esq., RIVKIND PEDRAZA & MARGULIES, P.A., Concord Building, Suite 600, 66 West Flagler Street, Miami, Fl 33130 AZAMARA CLUB CRUISES and CELEBRITY CRUISES, INC.. 1050 Caribbean Way Miami, Florida 33132 (305) 539-6000 Tel. (305) 539-8101 Fax By:_/s/ RANDY S. GINSBERG RANDY S. GINSBERG Fla. Bar No.: 185485 7

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?