DM Records, Inc. v. Selph Records, Inc. et al
Filing
1
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF against All Defendants. Filing fee $ 350.00 receipt number 113C-4632062, filed by DM Records, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summon(s), # 3 Summon(s), # 4 Exhibit Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Copyright Registration, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit B - Defendants' Copyright Registration, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit C - Album, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit D - Certificate of Recordation w/ Accompanying Bankruptcy Sale Documents and Copyright Assignment, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit E - Defendants' Demand Letter)(Towne, Charlotte)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
DM RECORDS, INC.
PLAINTIFF,
v.
SELPH RECORDS, INC.
and
FREDERICK REEVES A/K/A DOC ICE
A/K/A DOCTOR ICE A/K/A DOC
REEVES A/K/A DOC ICE REEVES
individually,
DEFENDANTS.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF
COMES NOW the Plaintiff, DM Records, Inc. (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), by and through
its attorney Charlotte Towne, Esq., and complains against Selph Records, Inc. (hereinafter
“Selph Records”) and Frederick Reeves a/k/a Doc Ice a/k/a Doctor Ice a/k/a Doc Reeves a/k/a
Doc Ice Reeves (hereinafter “Doc Ice”) (collectively “Defendants”) as follows:
I. PARTIES
1.
Plaintiff is a Florida corporation authorized to do business and doing business in
the music content industry at its principal place of business in North Miami Beach, Florida.
2.
Upon information and belief, Defendant Doc Ice is an individual who resides in
Brooklyn, New York.
3.
Upon information and belief, Defendant Selph Records is a New York
corporation organized in Kings county, New York.
4.
Upon information and belief, Defendants Selph Records and Doc Ice are the alter
ego of the other, and each is the officer, agent, servant, representative, and/or employee of the
other, acting in participation with the other, having authority or apparent authority to bind the
other.
II. NATURE OF THE CASE
5.
This is an action for declaratory relief for non-infringement of copyright of an
album of sound recordings. The album is entitled Rely On Selph (hereinafter the “Album”).
Defendant Doc Ice is the main featured artist performing on the Album. There are eleven sound
recordings embodied on the album. One of the eleven sound recordings on the Album is also
entitled “Rely On Selph”, which is the same as the title of the Album. The Album is the subject
of this action.
6.
Plaintiff is the registered sound recording copyright owner of the Album as a
published work. (See copy of Plaintiff’s U.S. Copyright Registration No. SRu000292461 for the
Album, and a copy of the United States Copyright Office website search records for the
Plaintiff’s copyright registration, attached hereto as “Exhibit A”.)
7.
Upon information and belief, Defendant Selph Records also registered a sound
recording copyright for a work entitled “Rely On Selph” as an unpublished work. (See copy of
Defendant’s U.S. Copyright Registration No. SRu000292461 showing the copyright registration
form executed by Doc Ice Reeves as President of Selph Records, Inc., and a copy of the United
States Copyright Office website search records for the Defendants’ copyright registration,
attached hereto as “Exhibit B”.)
8.
In 2001, Plaintiff acquired ownership of the Album, including all distribution
agreements and licenses pertaining thereto, after Plaintiff purchased it along with other assets,
2
including catalogs of hundreds of other albums, from the bankrupt estate of a Louisiana
corporation, Ichiban Records, Inc. (“Ichiban Records”) in the Ichiban Records’ Chapter 7
bankruptcy (“Ichiban Bankruptcy”). Ichiban Records’ assets, wherever located, including the
Album, were transferred to Plaintiff free and clear of any liens, claims, and encumbrances
pursuant to an order of the United States Bankruptcy Court in the Northern District of Georgia
(hereinafter “Bankruptcy Court”).
9.
Prior to the Plaintiff’s acquisition of the Album, Ichiban Records was the
exclusive distributor of the Album since the Album was released in 1994. (See copy of the
Album cover’s front and back, Album CD, and Album insert booklet with the words “Distributed
by Ichiban Records” shown thereon, attached hereto as “Exhibit C”.)
10.
Since Plaintiff acquired ownership of the Album in the Ichiban Bankruptcy,
Plaintiff and its licensees have continued to distribute the Album for more than eleven years
without the objection of Defendants.
11.
Now, after more than eleven years, Defendants assert that Plaintiff is violating
their proprietary rights in the Album’s copyright by distributing the Album without their
permission.
12.
Defendants’ assertions that Plaintiff has violated their copyright in the Album
ignores the fact that they conceded to Plaintiff’s rights in the Album when they (1) entered into
an exclusive distribution agreement with Ichiban Records in 1994 whereby they transferred
partial ownership of the copyright in the Album to Ichiban Records, (2) never objected to
Plaintiff’s acquisition of the Album in the Ichiban Records bankruptcy, and (3) never at any
point over the past eleven years objected to Plaintiff’s and its licensees’ distribution of the
Album.
3
13.
Defendants’ belated assertions that Plaintiff has violated their copyright in the
Album are unfounded and were presumably made with the sole intention of inducing Plaintiff
into paying Defendants a monetary settlement to avoid the cost of potentially having to defend
against their baseless claims.
14.
Therefore, to avoid legal uncertainty and to protect its business interests, Plaintiff
has brought this action for declaratory judgment that Plaintiff has not infringed on the copyright
in the Album. Plaintiff also seeks a determination that Defendants are barred from bringing
claims against Plaintiff as a result of the order of the Bankruptcy Court.
15.
Plaintiff also seeks injunctive relief and an award of costs and reasonable
attorney’s fees.
III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
16.
This civil action arises under the Federal Declaratory Judgments Act, 28 U.S.C.
§§ 2201 and 2202, and the Federal Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101, et seq. (the “Copyright
Act”). This Court has federal subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331. This
Court also has federal subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1338(a) because the
action arises under the Copyright Act.
17.
This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because (a) Defendants
intentionally sent threatening correspondence to Plaintiff in the State of Florida, asserting that the
activities of Plaintiff in Florida infringe their copyright in Album; (b) Defendants sent this
correspondence with the intention of inducing Plaintiff to cease certain business activities and
pay Defendants a monetary settlement, thereby causing injury to Plaintiff in Florida; (c) Plaintiff
filed the present action in direct response to Defendants’ correspondence, and therefore
4
Plaintiff’s claim arises out of Defendants’ contacts with the State of Florida; and (d) exercise of
personal jurisdiction would not be unreasonable.
18.
Venue is proper in this District of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and (c)
because a substantial part of events involved in this action occurred in this District, and the
injury to Plaintiff from Defendants’ unlawful conduct arose in this District.
IV. STATEMENT OF FACTS
19.
Sometime in or around 1994, Defendants entered into an agreement with Ichiban
Records pertaining to the release and sale of Defendants’ sound recordings. Upon information
and belief, Defendants’ agreement with Ichiban was an exclusive distribution agreement that also
granted Ichiban Records co-ownership of the copyrights in Defendants’ sound recordings.
20.
Upon information and belief, on or about April 13, 1994, Defendant Selph
Records, by and through its alter ego Defendant Doc Ice, applied for registration of copyright of
a sound recording entitled “Rely On Selph” as an unpublished work with the United States
Copyright Office. The copyright registration form shows a registration date of April 25, 1994
and SRu000292461 is the designated copyright registration number. Although the copyright
registration form shows Defendant Selph Records as the copyright claimant, upon information
and belief, the form was executed by Defendant Doc Ice as the president of Defendant Selph
Records on April 13, 1994. The names of the Album’s eleven sound recordings are not listed on
Defendants’ copyright registration form or on the United States Copyright Office website
records. (See attached Exhibit B.)
21.
Upon information and belief, Defendants’ copyright registration number
SRu000292461 is not for registration of the entire Album’s eleven sound recordings. Instead,
5
upon information and belief, Defendants’ copyright registration number SRu000292461 is for
registration of one sound recording entitled “Rely On Selph”.
22.
Upon information and belief, Defendants’ copyright registration number
SRu000292461 is for an unpublished work because the sound recording had not been released to
the public at the time Defendants filed the registration, and the copyright registration form does
not indicate that the work was published.
23.
Upon information and belief, Defendants copyright registration number
SRu000292461was registered before Defendants entered into the distribution agreement with
Ichiban Records and granted co-ownership of the copyright in Defendants’ sound recordings,
including the Album, to Ichiban Records.
24.
Shortly thereafter, on or around May 31, 1994, and pursuant to the agreement
between Defendants and Ichiban Records, the Album was released as a CD by a wholly owned
division of Ichiban Records called Wrap Records, and Ichiban Records commenced its
distribution of the Album. The catalog number of the Album is WRA 8027.
25.
Ichiban Records’ co-ownership of the Album’s copyright was clear on the face of
the Album by virtue of the Album’s CD artwork showing side-by-side logos for “Selph Records”
and “Wrap Records”, and a copyright notice appearing in substantially the following form:
© ℗ 1994 Selph Records, Wrap Records Distributed by Ichiban Records
The same copyright notice is also shown on the Album’s CD insert booklet. Furthermore, both
the Album’s CD artwork and insert booklet clearly showing that the Album was being
distributed by Ichiban Records. (See attached Exhibit C.)
6
26.
Defendants never objected to the Album’s artwork and copyright notices showing
Wrap Records, the wholly owned division of Ichiban Records, as a co-owner of the Album
copyright, and Ichiban Records as the distributor.
27.
Upon information and belief, Ichiban Records distributed the Album from the
date of its release in 1994 until the Ichiban Bankruptcy.
28.
Upon information and belief, at no time during Ichiban Records’ distribution of
the Album did Defendants object to the sale of the Album by Ichiban Records.
29.
In 1999, Ichiban Records filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which was later
converted to a Chapter 7 in 2000.
30.
In 2001, Plaintiff purchased substantially all of the assets of Ichiban Records
bankruptcy estate in the Ichiban Bankruptcy, wherever located, free and clear of any liens,
claims, and encumbrances. The assets of Ichiban Records bankruptcy estate that were purchased
by Plaintiff in the Ichiban Bankruptcy included without limitation a catalog of hundreds of
albums, the copyrights therein, and all of Ichiban Records’ distribution agreements.
31.
Upon information and belief, the Album, which included all of Ichiban Records’
rights, title, and interest therein, was an asset of the estate in the Ichiban Bankruptcy, and was
purchased by Plaintiff, free and clear of any liens, claims, and encumbrances.
32.
At no time during the Ichiban Bankruptcy proceedings did the Defendants object
as to the sale of the Album to Plaintiff.
33.
Shortly after Plaintiff acquired Ichiban Records’ assets, Plaintiff recorded with
the United States Copyright Office the copyright assignment of Ichiban Records’ copyrights to
Plaintiff that was executed by the Ichiban Bankruptcy trustee. (See copy of Certificate of
Recordation dated July 20, 2001, attached hereto as “Exhibit D”, which includes copies of the
7
Bill of Sale, Asset Purchase Agreement, Irrevocable License Assignment, Copyright
Assignment, and the Bankruptcy Court order (“Order”) confirming the sale of Ichiban Records’
assets to Plaintiff free and clear of any liens, claims, and encumbrances.)
34.
On April 11, 2002, Plaintiff also registered the sound recording copyright in the
Album as a published work with the United States Copyright Office. The Copyright Office
website records show Plaintiff’s copyright registration information including a list of the names
of all eleven sound recordings embodied on the Album. (See attached Exhibit A.)
35.
For over 11 years, Plaintiff and its licensees have made the Album available for
sale pursuant to its right to do so as a copyright owner in the Album, or at the very least, pursuant
to a valid and enforceable license. Plaintiff and its licensees’ distribution of the Album have
generated total sales of less than fifty dollars over the past 11 years.
36.
On or about March 15, 2012, Defendants’ attorney sent Plaintiff a cease and
desist demand letter (“Demand Letter”) claiming that Plaintiff was infringing on Defendant
Selph Records’ alleged copyright in the Album. (See copy of the Demand Letter, attached
hereto as “Exhibit E”.)
37.
Since Plaintiff’s receipt of the Defendants’ Demand Letter, Defendants’ attorney
has continued to send threatening emails to Plaintiff demanding monetary settlement.
38.
At no time over the past 11 years up until Defendants’ attorney sent their Demand
Letter making these allegations and threats had Defendants objected to Plaintiff’s distribution of
the Album.
39.
Plaintiff’s lawful distribution of the Album is pursuant to its ownership rights in
the copyright of the Album, or at the very least, pursuant to a valid and enforceable license.
8
40.
An actual case or controversy has arisen between the parties. Defendants have
threatened imminent litigation against Plaintiff, and have asserted that Plaintiff’s and its
licensees’ sale of the Album constitutes copyright infringement. These statements threaten
injury to Plaintiff.
COUNT 1
DECLARATORY RELIEF FOR NON-INFRINGEMENT
41.
Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1
through 40 hereof as if fully set forth herein.
42.
Based on the facts set forth in the foregoing allegations, an actual controversy has
arisen and now exists between the parties as to the ownership and rights in the Album.
43.
Under the circumstances, a judicial declaration is necessary and appropriate at this
time so that the parties and others may determine their rights under the laws at issue.
44.
Plaintiff is entitled to a declaration that Plaintiff’s and its licensees’ distribution of
the Album did not infringe on Defendants’ alleged copyright in the Album because (a) Ichiban
Records was a co-owner of the copyright in the Album, which was assigned to Plaintiff, and
Plaintiff is now a co-owner of the copyright in the Album, or (b) alternatively, Ichiban Records
was implicitly licensed the right by Defendants to distribute the Album, and such license was
assigned to Plaintiff, or (c) alternatively, due to Defendants’ lack of objection to Plaintiff’s
distribution of the Album for over eleven years, Plaintiff has a valid and enforceable implied
license to distribute the Album.
45.
Plaintiff is further entitled to a declaration that Defendants are estopped from
bringing claims against Plaintiff under the statute of limitations pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 507(b) of
the Copyright Act, and/or laches.
9
46.
Based on the Bankruptcy Court’s Order and the United States Bankruptcy Code
(“Bankruptcy Code”), Plaintiff is further entitled to a declaratory judgment that (i) the
Bankruptcy Court’s Order approving the sale of all of Ichiban Records’ assets, and the closing of
the Ichiban Bankruptcy case, preclude Defendants’ claims pursuant to the doctrines of res
judicata and/or claims preclusion; and (ii) section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code protects
Plaintiff as a good-faith purchaser and precludes Defendants’ post-bankruptcy sale claims.
47.
Upon information and belief, Defendants’ assertions of copyright infringement
were and continue to be made in bad faith for the sole purpose of inducing Plaintiff into paying
them a monetary settlement merely to avoid the cost associated with defending their baseless
claims.
48.
By their actions, Defendants have forced Plaintiff to retain the services of an
attorney to prosecute this action, and therefore, Plaintiff seeks to recover its reasonable
attorney’s fees and costs.
TRIAL BY JURY
49.
Plaintiff hereby requests trial by jury on all issues wherein trial by jury is
permissible.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
NOW WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that the Court grant the following relief:
A.
A declaratory judgment that Plaintiff’s and its licensees’ distribution of the
Album did not infringe on Defendants’ alleged copyright in the Album;
B.
A declaratory judgment that Defendants are estopped from bringing claims
against Plaintiff under the statute of limitations pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 507(b) of the Copyright
Act, and/or laches;
10
C.
A declaratory judgment that (i) the Bankruptcy Court’s Order approving the sale
of all of Ichiban Records’ assets, and the closing of the Ichiban Bankruptcy case, preclude
Defendants’ claims pursuant to the doctrines of res judicata and/or claims preclusion; and (ii)
section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code protects Plaintiff as a good-faith purchaser and precludes
Defendants’ post-bankruptcy sale claims;
D.
Injunctive relief enjoining Defendants, and their agents, servants, employees,
successors and assigns, and all those acting under the authority of or in privity with them, from
asserting that Defendants’ distribution of the Album infringes upon Defendants’ alleged
copyright in the Album or violates any other rights of Defendants related to the Album;
E.
An award of costs and reasonable attorney’s fees incurred by Plaintiff in
prosecuting this action, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505;
F.
That Plaintiff be awarded trial by jury on all issues triable by jury; and
G.
That Plaintiff be awarded any additional relief as this Court deems just and
proper.
Dated: April 11, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
CHARLOTTE TOWNE, P.A.
Attorney for Plaintiff
By: /s/ Charlotte Towne
Charlotte Towne, Esq.
Florida Bar Number: 64096
499 East Sheridan Street, Suite 201
Dania Beach, Florida 33004
Phone: (954) 306-6624
Fax: (954) 306-6027
Email: legal@charlottetownelaw.com
11
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?