Florida Democratic Party v. DETZNER et al
Filing
1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fee $ 350.00 receipt number 113C-5205824, filed by Florida Democratic Party. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summon(s) Ken Detzner, # 3 Summon(s) Susan Bucher, # 4 Summon(s) Penelope Townsley, # 5 Summon(s) Brenda Snipes, # 6 Exhibit 1-A, # 7 Exhibit 1-B, # 8 Exhibit 1-C)(Fotiu-Wojtowicz, Alaina)
(Rêv.2/0s)
q¡s44
rhe civil dockershe€r.
cIvIL
COVER SHEET
NOTICÉ: Attorneys MUST Indicate All Re-filed Cases Below.
(.r",."r*u.r,or"o"-rnu*ruu^iJuot"r"o**.1
I. (â) PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDÀNTS
The Florida Democratic Party
Ken Detzner, Secretary of State, State ofFlorida, Brenda Snipes,
Supervisor of Elections, Broward County Florida, Penelope
f .eôn
Co!¡nty ofResidencc ofFißl Listed Def€ndånt
(b)
(c)
County olResidence ofFirst Listed PIainliff
IN IJ S PLAINTIFF
Attomey's (FrN Na¡,e,
Leon
(IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
C
NOT¡] lN L^ND
!td r.lephore Nùnbrr)
^ddies',
Altomeys (¡rKiowt)
Daniel Nordby, Ken Spillias, Bumadette Norris-Wceks, Oren
Rosenthal
MIAMI-DAD! OMONROE OBROWARD O PALMBEACH C
(d) Check County Where
II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION
,þr
U.S. Govc¡nnrenl
TR^CÍ
LAND INVOLVED.
Coffey Burlington, PL 2699 S. Bayshore Dr' PH, Miami (305)
858-2900; Miçhael S. Olin, P.A. 169 E. Flagler St, Ste. 1224, Miami
(305)677-5088; B¡uce S. Rogo\tr, P.4 500 E Broward Blvd., Ste 1930,
È,.'.ti -'¡"r¡rl" /q5¿ì ?¡(?-Rqnq fìrôq.ñân Rôfh p A ?5?{ Pnn¡e rlcE
at I
CONDEM N^TION C^sES, USE THE LOC^TION oF lHE
(Prace !n
"x"
III.
orrv)
in one Box
MARTIN
Ð
ST,
LÙCIE O INDIAN RIVER d
"x" in o¡c Box ¡o, Prâirrìrr
âñd One Box lor Delendan()
CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES(Phæ
(For
Divesil,
câses Only)
PTF
-
DEF
O
Slålc
ê
I
trcorpo¡ared o, Princìpål
o
Cnizrtr otThis
(IJ.S, Oovernncnt Nol a Pâry)
OKEECHOBEE
o
2
FTF
4
DEF
aJ 4
I¡co¡porål.d.,dPrincipolPlace
Place ,lt
orBusiness I¡
(hdicatè cnizenship orPårlies ir Iieû l¡l)
o
SrÈre
^nolhcr
d
d
130
3ós
¡40 Negoli¿ble Inrruñerl
ì50 RÊcov.ry olOverpaynicnl
Peßonãllùj!r,
o 400
o 4t0
o
d
d
PROPF.RTY RIGHTS
o
d
o
130 F¿dôrrl Employeß
152
lt8
ôlProperry 2ì Usc 881
-
& Entorcen.nl olJudsrôrl
O
28 USC
422
^ppeal
ó20 Olìr.r Food & Druß
ó25 DrùB Relar€d Seizure
Mâri.è
Miller Acl
120
O
PERSONÀL INJUNY
PERSONÀL INJURY
O
O
O
o
430
454
nâókerc.r Innu€rced and
corupl Org¿nizaliors
o
o
R.covery olDelãul{ed
Súte Rrâpporlionm.nl
PERSONAL
at l5l
(Excl, vrdanÐ
Reco!èry olOverpayn.nl
nrvéGrár'¡ B.nelìls
850 SccùrilielComnoditie,/
710 F¡ir Labor Srandârds
O
O
120 Lsbor/MgNl. Relârlons
o
---t-ût
130 Olhe¡ Persor¿l
Prôp.rty Damôgê
O
Frodùcl Liâbilily
95 Corlracl P¡oduct
385 Prope¡ry Dân1age
Producl Liabilily
Liâbilil,
a 2ta
o 220
o 230 Renl Le.s. & Ejectmert
o
o 245
o 290 All Orìrer Reãl ProÞery
..ú
'
w/oisabilili.s
^i1er.
446 Aner, !/Disabilili€s
730Lsbor/Mgmr.Reporlirg
& Disclosure Act
890 orher Slâlutory
d
?90 Odrer Labor Litigàlior
"x
in
où.
463 Hebe¿s
4ót Orh.r
ì
usc
3410
^cljons
892 Econonic SrabiìizÂlion Acl
393 Envionnenttl Mållc¡3
(U.s, Pláirrifi
Acl
394 Enelgy
^lìocalion
895 Fr..dom ollrioimatioô Acl
O
D€(ornin¿lion
900
Under Equol Acce$ 10 luslicô
^ppeôlôlFc.
O
ôdlc'8-{u¡¡À-
-
9t0 CirúulioÍãlny olSlale
corp!rAlien
migrut on
District
aox only)
from D
Removed
state court
t2
791 Enpl, Rel.Inc Secù¡il
-
550 Civil Righc
3
Re-filedñ 4
(see VI below)
a) Re-filed Case O
VI. RELÀTED/RE-FILED
cAsE(s).
VII,
8?t Cuslom€r Chóllcnse
861 DIWC/D¡Ww (405(s))
864 SS¡D Till! XVI
26 USC 7609
445
{Place ûr
I Original û 2
Proceeding
362 Black Lung (921)
O
tr
440 Olhêr Civil Righls
V. ORIGIN
86t HIA (¡l95il)
?40 R¡ilwây Lsbo¡Acl
a
at
O
O
o
ô
o
a
O
O
O
Reinstatod
Reopened
or D
YES rø NO
5
O6
b) Related Cases al
Muhidist¡ict
Litigation
t'l
YES øNO
DOCKET NTJMBER
JUDGE
42 U.S.C. s. 1983
CAUSE OF
LENGTH OF TRIAL via
IN
IJNDER F,R,C,P, 23
COMPLAINT:
IS
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
days esti,nåted
CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS
ACTION
both sides to
entìre case)
in complainti
CHECK
JURYDEMÀND: Ú
Yes
DATE
November 4, 2012
RDCEIPT
'
dNo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?